May 9, Thursday 10:00 AM, National Press Club, Washington, DC: Watch these Navy SEAL Team VI families and other family members as they reveal the Obama Admin…
Pray each and everyday for our nation and all its citizens.
May 21, 2013
April 22, 2013
Uncategorized abuse, camp le jeune contaminated water, Camp Le Jeune water contamination, Chlorine gas exposure, Fort Polk, military families, military non-disclosure, pentagon non-disclosure, post world war 2 neglect and abuse military bases, public health Leave a comment
Thanks, you have my word I will help you also as I am able regardless of how many years pass. I do need to have my basics to survive. I pray each day for our country and for a better future for all. TN
April 19, 2013
Just as in our historical past, people in our country are very concerned over the loss of liberties, land (Agenda 21), air (chem sprays from airplanes to include the new push for drones to be allowed to fly all over our skies or over our homes) and water(“Clean water Act”- one more gimmick behind the scenes legislation that is placing our water in the hands of the bureaucracy for the future total control by the United Nations (UN). Many lives were lost during the civil war over the same issues for those wishing to control irresponsibly our nation, yet we have become complacent and more enslaved today than in those times from the past. Long gone are the days in which American men would fight for their women, children, liberties and land. How easy it has been for everyone to forget how many died brutally in order to unite and preserve this beautiful United States. It is a total shame how we are allowing America to die, our economy destroyed, the permitting of incremental machinations of environmental assaults via calamities to our communities( on crops chemtrails metals related drought-BP oil spill etc), our food and once beautiful landscape deteriorating before our very eyes. Our Constitutional Republic (representative of the people) is deliberately being dismantled to make way for centralization of power which will be more freightful (interdependent/dependent hydra central monster) and super controlling over our lives than the real threat of any one other nation’s possible demise. Sad to see so many complacently going about life as if so many dysfunctions were normal when in reality they are down right crazy. We cannot allow the loss of our second amendment for the minute we do we will have the Transhumanists making their rounds over our cities selling us their abomination of robotics. Think about it carefully (emergency disaster mode the new trend-even apps to track disasters and weather calamities are being created, even charging for the service:sad but people buying them); run for public office, make calls and keep your towns under guard over other possible disasters that are designed to weaken us at all fronts. Wake Up! Do something and stand up for yourself or country or else we die in the hands of tyrants.
Transhumanists making their rounds in US cities selling us their abomination of robotics.
Who gives them the right to declare themselves Gods over the lives of others?
Sensationalism occurs when public display of loss created yet under Monsanto controlled genetic modified food, our livers are being destroyed and proven by scientists, so we are being killed slowly. Is it Ok for special interests to assault our bodies even alter them incrementally without our consent, also hidden with no label? Killing is killing whether done overtly, covertly (hidden under the radar or via power) or in plain sight.
April 10, 2013
Uncategorized chemtrail, chemtrails, Former FBI Chief, gaming, genetic modified organism, GMO's, human genes, investigative journalists, Monsanto Act, Nuremberg trial, Nuremburg code, Nuremburg Trials, prosperous economies, Ted L. Gunderson, transportation, weather modification Leave a comment
Irresponsible Fake Journalism Destroying America
It seems to me that over the years critical thinking and non-special interest’s journalism have become part of the once sovereign for the benefit of people media form of the past. The United States should have done more and better in order to preserve a more independent non-bias form of journalism to disseminate information. Most major media outlets just pour out whatever Reuters or some other pre-screened privately owned special interest gives out as facts. The consequence is that blatant fabrications and major huge lies are given out for public consumption. Investigative journalists today are not even allowed to go back and check the veracity of daily unusual events and stories. Others get threatened, yes even by government itself and or special vendettas into the private lives of citizens trying to bring more clarity and preserve liberty in their neighborhoods or states is taking place. It seems that the more liberty oriented the State the more it comes under attack with made-up special events in order to destroy citizens’ liberties, right to self-shield from future harm and the slow destruction of their once independent prosperous economies. The middle class is disappearing in America and local economies are being destroyed incrementally via weather modification for future profit to special interest like Soros for the future Agenda 21 which via disasters will eventually pass all land to those running the corporate/central government alliances and Monsanto taking over all future food supply that despite of scientist showing their foods cause the body harm and yes even gene expression which merges the natural biology of humans with those other non-human genes spliced inside the new altered foods by Monsanto. This irresponsible existing form of media is a threat to all civilizations for no matter how bizarre the story and even which proofs exists to contradict their bizarre stories the media special agenda central media Trolls continue to tell the public all kinds of blatant lies even in spite their of the daily visual destruction to them.
Points as of late:
- Under the so call no funding to run government fiasco a Monsanto Rider (Monsanto Protection Act) was entered so no one in spite if even human body parts were to mutate or fall off, NO ONE UNDER this Obama signed directive could ever sue or file a lawsuit against Monsanto. (This is done in Dictatorships ran governments or by communist regimes which in Cambodia millions died due to agriculture failure as dictated by their leader who did as he pleased with farmers natural privately guarded crops that later failed due to mis-management.
- Chemical aerosols studied by geoengineering watch.org and others observes that the dispersed chemtrails from the skies are killing local agriculture and harming human health. This tweaking of weather will upset the natural wind currents across the earth and cause a lot of economic damage. Special interests, banking loans, farming loans etc., which could slowly lead to collapse when private individuals cannot pay nor get growth from their labor efforts and then the “central government” will come in and mop it all up taking over ownership of most private enterprises taking the US over back to a feudal system. We all become slaves and then maybe introduced to the one world government of central leaders which we won’t be able to reject for we won’t have the second amendment right to bear arms and protect ourselves from any form of new tyranny which they already have a bad record for Monsanto can do as it pleases and also then the “Trans-humanists” will come in with their now Public wish to turn us into robotic electrical or nanotech patent owned technologies to serve them all as slaves for they will own what inside of us. Monsanto owns any plants that even by air contaminate nearby farms. At that point no one could opt-out for we won’t have independent agriculture or land to escape from the madness.
- Media fails to tell public that in 98% of all cases those hurting others were under pharmaceutical prescriptions to include bad diets ladden with the current altered poor food supply available. Food spliced with animal genes could lead to altered future animalistic behavior. It is hypocritical to try and pass a mandated medical system insurance when diseases are allowed to be created to include the damage to livers and other organs from both poisoned agriculture (most regular rice had arsenic due to pesticides) and genetic modified (GMO’s) organisms that today are in most soy, rice and even animal feed. They all stand to profit in the government health care system for diseases will grow and escalate due to the altered food and agriculture for this is a given since happening already. Can anyone imagine what a huge profit in business this will be to these special interets? and yes even water supply to include rain water rights are being taken over by local governments and the communist United Nations (UN). The UN has a document titled, Global Human Management in which they give themselves the communist right to treat humans as if like insects or a pest if something like a spread of something occurs. Insects can get sprayed randomly which in some parts of Florida private neighborhoods were being spread by insecticides without public consent nor an opt-out. These are crimes agaisnt humanity and not normal. The only thing we have left to shield is our 2nd amendment which is also being taken away with frequent bizarre media stories to make it happen. This is no different of a crime than those at Nuremberg Trial for entail human experimentation without individual consent. Instead of gas chambers or visual showers as in Hitlers days now they have tweaked it so its not that visible but tanks spraying gas loaded onto planes even if via the skies its no different and will lead to consolidated power and control of all human world resources as explained in their own documents for wish to control and own the weather that our creator naturally provided. Former FBI Chief, Ted L. Gunderson, makes a statement regarding the chemtrail “death dumps”, click here for his message video.
The Nuremburg Code, 1947
Acquired from website of the US Department of Health and Human Services, at Office of Human Research Protections , accessed 16 July 2009 check also post war guidelines nuremberg Copy and pasted below since pages are no longer linking. (no surprise)
1.) The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
2.) The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
3.) The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
4.) The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
5.) No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
6.) The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
7.) Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
8.) The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
2 Appendix D: International Ethical Standards
9.) During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seemed to him to be impossible.
10.)During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probably [sic] cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
(henrymakov and DDees.com, image source above)
February 15, 2013
Via e-mail-notification (Reposted since time is of essence and “gun ban” is a globalist centralists power grab. How will we protect ourselves from Transhumanists embedded in government even at local levels and even the top online technology engineer for Google eugenics singularity transhumanist Ray Kursweil? Call Now! This is an emergency…
Dear fellow Patriot,
In a few minutes, the Colorado House of Representatives will begin the first round of floor debate on four extremely anti-gun bills.
Among the draconian measures they will debate today, are:
• HB-1224: Bans all magazines that hold more than 15 rounds.
• HB-1226: Bans armed self-defense on college campuses; expanding criminal safe-zones to all state college and university campuses.
• HB-1228: Imposes a Jim Crow-style GUN TAX on all firearm purchases. This legislation has no limit on the amount the CBI could charge for a background check.
• HB-1229: Bans the private sale of firearms and institutes universal background checks/gun registration for all Colorado gun owners.
Anti-gun Democrats are feeling the heat. Capitol sources say that some Democrats may be wavering in their support of these gun control bills.
It’s not too late to late to contact them urge them, politely, to vote against these anti-gun bills.
Below are links to Facebook, Twitter, and e-mail for Democratic House members who need to hear from gun owners like you. They check their email, Twitter and Facebook accounts on the House floor, so this is GREAT opportunity to put pressure on them.
If you’re not sure what to say, here’s some sample language: “Representative: Please do not penalize Colorado’s law-abiding gun owners. I urge you to vote “NO” on these anti-gun bills (HB-1224, HB-226, HB-1228 & HB-1229).”
|Ed Vigil||HD 62||(303)-866-2916|
|Joseph Salazar||HD 31||(303)-866-2918|
|Daniel Kagan||HD 3||(303)-866-2921|
|Max Tyler||HD 23||(303)-866-2951|
|Dominick Moreno||HD 32||(303)-866-2964|
|Dian Mitsch Bush||HD 26||(303)-866-2923|
|Leroy Garcia||HD 46||(303)-866-2968|
|Steve Lebsock||HD 34||(303)-866-2931|
|Dave Young||HD 50||(303)-866-2929|
|Tracy Kraft-Tharp||HD 29||(303)-866-2950|
|John Buckner||HD 40||(303)-866-2944|
Please do not delay — every moment counts.
Contact these Representatives, RIGHT NOW. Politely, urge them to vote “NO” on gun control.
Dudley Brown Executive Director
P.S. Thanks homeland security for being my top blog readers. Get a real job like protecting our country NOT just spying and given away to global interests that truly only care for their bottom line NOT the families nor jobs or needs of the American people.
December 14, 2012
This article section is very uplifting in that we are all capable of achieving greatness if we continue to have faith and do not lose it. There will be challenging times ahead so we could use available tools such as affirmative prayer among many others to include trying to maintain a balanced diet to keep ourselves more positive and keep things in perspective. 2012 had many challenges and changes; however we are all capable of creating a better world. Its time to prepare for the new year and do our best at safeguarding our nation of checks & balances, liberties, families and a prosperous economy. Below is the article by Roger Mason sent to his e-mail subscribers.
….”Prayer is faith. What is faith? Faith is trust in the unknown. This universe is created, preserved, and destroyed by an Infinite Intelligence. When you have faith and trust in the Infinite Ground of Being (“God”) you are rewarded. Faith is the opposite of hope. Hope is for dopes, and the last refuge of fools. Faith will move mountains. Jesus spoke about faith quite a bit in the New Testament. The real meaning of belief is strong faith, not rigid dogma. When you say “believe”, use that word as meaning strong faith. Jesus said, “Believe in these things, and ye shall have them.” He also said, “With men these things are not possible, but with God, all things are possible.” It is done unto you as you believe. St. Mark said, “Everything is possible to one who has faith.” You don’t have to be a Christian to read the New Testament. Jesus was a spiritual teacher, and the New Testament is full of wisdom. The Buddhist sutras and Hindu writings are also full of wisdom. There are many non-religious references to faith. Ralph Waldo Emerson said, “man is what he thinks all day long.” Psychologist William James said, “the power to move the world is in your subconscious mind.” As within, so without. Faith can, and will, move mountains. According to your faith it is done unto you. Whatsoever things you desire, when you pray believe you receive them, and you shall have them.
The best writing on affirmative prayer is by Joseph Murphy. He wrote over thirty such books, including The Power of Your Subconscious Mind. You can look up his name on amazon.com, or in your local library. Tony Robbins, and other modern self realization teachers, have been very influenced by him. Tony used to ask people what they were missing in their lives. Then he asked why they were missing these things in their lives. What are you missing in your life? Why don’t you have these things? Why don’t you have what you want? What is preventing you from having what you want? Design your life as you want it. Yes, you do have that ability. You really are the captain or your soul, and the master of your fate. Look around you. Do you love it? Do you hate it? There it is the way you made it! We have the tremendous power to choose what we want in life. Ask for Divine Guidance in life. Choose happiness and fulfillment. Choose health and affluence. Choose love and harmony. Choose to be a blessing to this world. Choose to make the world a better place from your life and your work.
You are what you think all day long. If you keep saying, “I can’t do it”, then you never will do it. If you keep saying, “I can do it”, then you will do it. Change your thoughts, and you change your very destiny. Whatever your conscious mind declares and affirms, your subconscious mind will bring to pass. Yes, you can have whatever material things you realistically want. You deserve to live a comfortable and happy lifestyle, and certainly can. More importantly, you can have whatever non-material things your heart wants. Do you want to find a wife or husband? You can find your ideal mate. Do you want a better job or profession? You can find the job you need. Do you have an addiction to anything? You can overcome it. Do you want good health? Then claim it. The universe always has an answer for you. The universe always has the right answer for you. What you need is far more important than merely what you want. We often want the wrong things. Pray for what you need, rather than merely what you want. The Infinite Wisdom has a much better plan for you. You have a right to health, happiness, affluence, and all good things. You have the freedom to choose. Choose the good things, the right things, the spiritual things. There is always an answer to all your needs, all your problems. Depend on the Infinite Wisdom, rather than your own limited, thinking mind. Declare and affirm what you need, and it will come to you. If you have faith as a grain of mustard seed, you can move mountains.
Avoid asking for a specific thing. Ask that the Universal Intelligence guide you to exactly what is best for you. For example, don’t ask that you get a job at the Smith Company. Ask that you get the right job for both you and for the company. There may be much better jobs you will be divinely led to. Don’t ask to marry a certain man or woman. Ask that the universe find the ideal mate for you. Divine guidance is always available to use, if we will just accept it. As you become more open, you will find the universe talks to you. That’s right, the universe will guide you at all times if you just become quiet and listen. Just be quiet and listen, and you will always get Divine Direction. Just pay attention. You will get “signs” regularly. The secret is to quiet your thinking human mind, and accept the higher spiritual wisdom and intelligence. Everything that happens to you is exactly what you need to experience at that time. There are no mistakes in the universe. Whatever is happening to you right now is exactly what you need to experience. If you reject it, it will happen to you again and again, until you learn the lesson you need to learn. Everything is exactly the way it should be, or it would be another way. Always remember that everything you see and experience is exactly what it should be, or it would be another way. Every experience in our lives is exactly what we need to experience and learn from at that moment. The universe is always perfect. Nothing happens by chance. This is a world of universal order and universal laws. There are no mistakes.
Wouldn’t you like to fulfill your innermost desires? Aren’t you tired of not having what you really need deep in your heart? You can live a life of fulfillment and abundance. You can live a life where you are overflowing with blessings, rather than living in lack and deprivation. Yes, you can design your life like an artist. The universe is more beautiful, wonderful, fulfilling, glorious, and just than your most fondest dreams. You were not given desires to frustrate you, and cause you to feel unfulfilled. You were given desires to lead you to a higher consciousness and deeper awareness, to be happy and fulfilled. Worry, fear, anxiety, and depression don’t have to be a part of your life. The power of the universe is within all of us. We are not weak, frail, fallible human beings. We are powerful spiritual beings, and are one with the universe. All the powers of existence are within you.
Get a book by Joseph Murphy, or another author who writes about affirmative prayer. You can Google “Joseph Murphy free downloads” and read his books for free. There are lots of free Murphy books on the Internet. Change your life and your very destiny. Life is a brief flash of light in the cosmos. Enjoy it as much as possible. We are only on earth a very short while, so make the most of it. You can enjoy a life beyond your fondest dreams if you will just submit to the Infinite. Not my will be done, but thy will be done” (Roger Mason, 2012).
Roger Mason is a writer, educator and author of many wellness books such as Beta Glucan, No More Horse Estrogen and has an economic rant blog and wellness products site, Young Again products, Inc.
Roger Mason. Affirmative Prayer. (2012). Retrieved November 20, 2012, Newsletter.
November 29, 2012
Uncategorized base closure post globalization, BRAC, BRAC base realignment committee, business developers expansion and chlorine gas valve irresponsibility, Fort Polk, Fort Polk Louisiana, Fort Polk suicide rate cover-up, Greater Vernon Chanmber of Commerce Commercial interests over public safety, housing water Fort Polk, league of nations, Louis Caldera visit to Fort Polk prior to Chlorine gas explosion, Military bases, military families Fort Polk, Military health care benefits, military suicide rates, military veterans, one-world government realignment, Secretary of the Army, secretary of the army Louis Caldera, United Nations, US regionalization Leave a comment
Fort Polk has also been a base where many family members have sustained injuries. It’s in a remote location and it takes about an hour to get to a bigger place in every direction so it often creates an insulated environment. This semi-isolated environment creates a lot of potential for abuse in which injuries or shady happenings in and out of the small area are not reported to the Department of the Army. While stationed there and in the last year in 1999; I sustained a Chlorine gas injury from a chlorine valve that exploded as I was walking my dogs. The housing area had to be evacuated. It later turns out that the mayor owns a water company and pipes for many years in the housing were running muddy like water in the kitchen and housing showers. One would have to let the water run for a while before it could run clear. Well, this in my opinion was then a source of profit and extra income for those running the commercial water trucks that brought clean water inside the base for those having to buy clean water. Housing area leaders reported that the chlorine valve alarm was running off many times but turned off and the problem never corrected appropriately until myself and many other families nearby without having any warning for base paper never covered alarm situation, many of us suffered burns and chlorine gas exposure when the chlorine gas valve exploded. I have to sincerely post this for many of us never got compensated and blown off when we tried to go for medical care and even today claim that info not on files but everyone has a copy of their records. To this day costly to purchase supplements , costs in clean living conditions environment adjustments etc., yet the military says all allergic Rhinitis nothing else. While trying to get medical care for all these years got nothing but disregard and taken advantage off with them using statute of limitations which I would like to challenge . Other info. pending due to sensitive nature. I recently ran into a couple retiring here and the people running Fort Polk are still going about business as usual and make it uncomfortable for family members so I needed to report this other side of Fort Polk. For as long as things do not get reported nor those taking responsibilities when family members get injured but bury problems under the carpet that place will not change. Single soldiers may fair better but the stories there for families are almost like a very bad dream. To close, when the secretary of the army came to visit I was asked to leave meeting for they did not want anyone to raise their hand or tell the secretary of the army that that base needed some more scrutiny or extra care for families for since isolated many shady happenings were occurring and also many single soldiers committing suicide almost one or two or more per year while we were stationed there and very unusual in my opinion. Enclosed is proof and my ticket that I had to attend the secretary of the army visit event but not allowed to attend but escorted out. I guess they did not wish to jeopardize the ability at further profits for the establishment. They violated my constitutional rights for their benefit and maybe not applicable but they had two Mp’s asking me to leave and not allowing me to speak or attend that secretary of army meeting copy of ticket enclosed. These cover-ups are what later lead to injuries and base problems status quo. To think that a month or two after this secretary of the army visit the chlorine gas valve exploded injuring me and perhaps this could have been avoided if allowed to speak and voice my opinion for the Department of the Army to take better care of military families being stationed at Fort Polk. Enclosed are some pictures to show course of events. One has to question why is it that many military bases have been poorly ran, others with toxins like Camp Lejuene prior water system and so does so many other parts of American lives over the years under constant environmental and psychological assaults via constant never ending of wars, dwindling economies and eroding daily liberties. What country are we becoming? One in which Cronyism for cash flow for special interests and by moving people count numbers around states to boost spending yet not really creating a real functional economy were one creates tangible products and services? Our creator will see that these individuals face justice. Our current Managed trade by World Trade Organization (WTO) is nothing more than the transfer of US wealth and prosperity to China to destroy America while our families and citizens suffer. Sad to see leaders resorting to violating women’s rights in order to continue to boost economies for special interests and cronies placing themselves in highly paid government jobs at the expense of others. No further abuse or disregard will be tolerated. America must ensure that it keeps its second Amendment or we stand to be sitting ducks to predators worldwide.
November 3, 2012
Uncategorized 2012 elections, bumpy ride, business, current-events, future leader, future run, Mitt Romney, Mitt Romney business leader, Mitt Romney for Presidente, politics, Presidential elections, sound economic policies, US economy, vote for Mitt Romney Leave a comment
Please vote Mitt Romney to buy America time so as to restore our checks & balances form of government and take back our nation via sound economic policies and responsible business growth. It is deceiving to ask voters to just write in names etc, for we all know that these candidates will not get elected and then we lose the party. We must nurture a future leader starting today so as to prepare to lead us into the future. Run for office and displace the candidates who are there as change agents to communism and one world government for predatory special interests. Our nation and all citizens to include our children are in great jeopardy and we must pull together and work hard in whichever small way during our daily tasks to make America once again a nation of diverse cultures but united in purpose and in opportunities at a better life with liberty to include right to be secure in our persons and property.Trust me on this one, Vote Mitt Romney. It will be a bumpy ride from this day forward but it is in our destiny to not be slaves to others but leaders to the world living in liberty, prosperity and harmony with our families and neighbors. Your nation needs you, Vote today.
September 27, 2012
It’s uncomfortable to face but evidence all around us that America is in decline. One must study and analyze what is taking place for each passing year we lose more of our liberties. Today, I was told that nobody cares for everyone is very busy caring for their bottom line; however this is the very thing that is leading us into a totalitarian system in which there are no rights just privileges which could be taken away at anytime. Each year more laws are passed that are even taking away our right to practice our professions by legislating them away, Medical doctors cannot really practice good medicine, teachers must follow programs handed to them by planners, people not allowed agriculture to grow their food since plants outside dying from spray trails, our food supply is making us sick due to being altered genetically yet those producing the poisons sanctioned and allowed to do as they please, and overall big players abusing societal system to their favor at every turn. It is neither normal nor moral for others to take total control of people’s right to self-shield or to protect their minds and bodies from external harm. There seems to be plenty of money to blow things up and place satellites and wacky surveillance sytems all over the place but not enough when they injure or disregard others physical body. The new paradigm developing in today’s society, at deceitful leaders helm is one of taking total control of human beings, abusing them and then taking away their ability to sustain themselves. This situation is extremely disturbing and should be questioned. So many decades and centuries of challenges and humanity has learned nothing? Why allow ourselves to be enslaved by others? What is occuring in reality is being made legal via the passing of deceptive legislation but in reality legalized genocide. The military no longer cares how or when they dispose of those serving or that served; most not being ethical in following their oath and our congress no longer serves the people but the banks. Each single institution we enjoyed has been degraded or disrupted to include the deliberate separation of families when they fly on a plane by having to pay extra fees. With this ongoing trend all of us will be placed at risk and some sooner than others but eventually we will all lose. We stand to lose our homes, our jobs, our nation , our families and yes even our minds for the plan is to take control of that also. Before closing I will say please study more how is it that we got here and if this is what you really wish for your life. In closing, I would say do not join any military for it no longer serves America nor its people and it’s not the same in honor military of years past. Also, there is good use of technology but also there may be plans to use that also to take away who knows what at this point. Another thing the leaders at Fort Polk are worst than self-serving despicable leaders for voting themselves big paying jobs at my and others expense and all that suffered at that horrible infamous place to include the many suicides even during prior peace time. Do something before its too late and try no to love your servitude as Huxley predicted in his writings. Not a Saint but vote for Mitt Romney to buy us some time until we find a better leader or just have a revolution as Bill of Rights & Constitution tried to convey; especially since those ruling are pure Tyrants and destroying us each passing day.
Insight into the Net history:
September 13, 2012
Uncategorized 2nd amendment, Americans, Auschwitz, banking financiers, BRAC, Camp Lejeune, china, china currency manipulation, China trade, Chlorine gas, federal Reserve, Fort Polk, Fre eTrade, genetic engineered, human biology, job outsourcing, Kings, nation states, new world order, Obama, Obama water bill camp lejeune too late, old world monarchies, poison water camp lejeune, public law 87-297, Queens, smart grid, transhumanism, United Nations, United Nations history, US dollar, Wars, wifi- radiofrequency, World bank, world war II, WWII Leave a comment
Well, after world war II which was in itself funded by the usual special power players and with the excuse of reconstructing war torn Europe the League of Nations which then became the United Nations (engineered by the of course banking financiers) along with the newly formed World bank and International monetary fund pretty much decided that they would lead the new post war world into recovery. What most nation states or individual countries failed to see was that in actuality on paper the trio created a self-serving bureaucracy that would incrementally make them the centralizations of power and of course passing over the world assets for themselves to own and manage regardless if it makes sense or not such as the insanity they are allowing to occur all over Europe and the middle east to include endorsements of nanotechnology, technocracy, wifi- radiofrequency power grid that affects human health and altering plant/animal biology with genetic engineered patented new life forms and polluted food supply that they will further own via the so call “free-trade” harmonizing nations ways of growing food even if polluted as in China. One could add to their new repertoire plans at shaping the world according to their self-serving apocalyptic views and profits a trans-humanist society in which they plan to merge human biology with robotics and if you have any doubts watch the meeting being planned for Russia and the movie the Transcendant man in which politicos such as Obama, Clinton, Col. Powell etc, make an appearance and actually endorse such monstrosities’. These transformations of man is so that no one will be able to revolt or take the power back from them for they are self-declared autocrats and un-Godly. The promotion of all kinds of human societal degradation is not because they truly care about gays, the poor, individual nation’s empowerments, health etc, but to use these wedge issues as useful to divide and conquer later to destroy and enslave all of society. Slowly but surely they have destroyed the sovereign economies of many nations in Europe with Spain and many others experiencing about 100 suicides per day. The so call Fed- reserve plans one more round of bailout money Q3 quantitative easing 3 which will further destroy the dollar plus add to that all the outsourcing of our jobs, and a trade policy that deliberately allows China to gain over and surpass our economy.
Even many bases such as Fort Polk, Camp Lejeune etc, were allowed to deteriorate so poorly to the point of some exploding if by poisons such as bad water, radiation, gases etc. and the military wellness of soldiers and their families compromised for they just plain do not care. Today many bases temporarily fixed up to ease and make a bit better the transitioning for the further wars and further fire power to further along their madness and futuristic evil world where there will be no privacy and no liberty. Many at Camp Lejeune got cancer and no one got compensated. Obama even blocked a male soldier that got breast cancer from getting any kind of compensation then later extended bill for medical care but many died before that signing due to block delays to not pay yet they wish for them to so easily volunteer to go to fight and die in the never ending wars. These entities need to be taken to court for abuse and crimes against humanity. The logistics to carry on a centralized one world type of governmnet is tyrannical to include almost impossible and would require a suffocating grid of weird drones flying all over the place not to count their record for potential total human abuse and degradation to the people.
After WWII the dynamic Smart-grid, appliances, weapons, surveillance system etc, trio created the BRAC base realignment bureaucracy so that little by little after they accomplish their harnessing of the world; then bases will once again begin to start closing or as they label themselves Base Realignment Committee–realigned for shut down down the road so a small town should not depend on their bases as a source of supporting local economies for best to grow your own economy out of the weapon dependent economy. Once bases shut down then China et al., will move in with the cash reserves to buy out the US to make ready for the “One world centralized by autocrats elitists economy taking society back to a feudal system. Public law 87-297 Freedom for War- is still in the books that allows everything to be transferred over to the United Nations and no one will be allowed to have the 2nd amendment that we now enjoy to protect ourselves from harm; especially our right to protect ourselves from an autocratic Mao like Madmen & women that love central government under a United Nations so elitists can run it all and the financiers monarch’s from the old world taking over world assets just like the good old times when only Queens and Kings ruled the world. It all seemed to work and convinces others until their killing-sprees and lack of respect for human life has become ever so more evident. I was one to suffer under their yoke and still machinations delivered so that I lose my military retirement care after being a spouse over 20 years and being exposed to their evil chlorine gases no different than the ones allowed at Auschwitz. I risk a lot but Americans need to wake-up and protect themselves for this existing and future evil that is being incrementally unleashed on our nation and the world. The carnage has to stop and it is totally madness to attack Iran and many other nations for they keep exposing the world to more and more poisons just to continue their dysfunctional archaic world of old same power players evil- ran society that is actually stopping real progress and the potential for people to live a real beautiful productive world that is not dependent on old sociopaths but a check & balances society that will respect individuals worldwide. Do something each day to stop them for we all stand to perish.
August 27, 2012
Uncategorized 2012 elections, constitutional republic, current-events, feudal system, human biology, Mitt Romney, mob rules, Nanotechnology, Obama, politics, transcendant man, transhumanism, vote for Mitt Romney Leave a comment
We all know that Ron Paul wont be allowed to win the election for his going back to Constitutional Republic nation of checks & balances type of nation drastically and even his son is far from us when siding with insiders on certain issues so for now all we have left is voting for Presidential Candidate Mitt Romney. Voting for Romney is like placing a band-aid on a huge problem that America has; however it will buy us time to later come up with a more truly caring of America leader. We need a leader that will support and lead our nation as a Constitutional Republic not a future nation of vultures for democracy only where mob rules over the rights of individuals nor a candidate that supports The Transcendant Man movie ideology (endorsed by Obama even making an appearance in the movie) of turning humanity into a robotic controlled dictatorship led by transhumanists central control top to bottom society of feudal workers to the State. We are all in great peril and in a way both parties act like a one monster with two heads slowly taking America to an Orwellian dark path of reinvented feudalism which is nothing but the Monarchs of years past taking back control of all assests in the entire world, subjugating nation states to their whims and future plans of even Altering later human biology with robotics via Nanotechnology and biotech transforming food, seeds, altering the environment/ climate without our input nor consent. Wedge issues such as abortion, gay marriage, war positioning etc., are just distractions wedge issues that mask the real destruction of our individual rights we enjoy regardless of backgrounds with Bill of Rights & as a Constitutional Republic (checks & balances between branches of gov) to self-shield, sovereinghty, prosperity, ability to enjoy privacy, private property and to be secured in our persons and homes.
Today, without our consent we are being subjected to harmful altered food, seeds, radiofrequency, climate/biology incremental changes, wars for centralization of power or central one-world government bureaucracy etc, you get the picture. Please, do not be deceived nor waste your vote with those destined to not win and vote for Mitt Romney and yes to many of us is a band-aid but will buy us some time until we get the hero and honest candidate that believes in the right of individuals to have liberty, private property & to be secured also in his person with liberty & Justice under one nation indivisible for has many cultures, under one creator of our natural and beautiful humanity.
June 16, 2012
Uncategorized 9th and 10th Amendments, American population, Bill of Right, democrat, demopublicans, Karl Rove, Maryland GOP, one party system, political ideologies, public schools, Republican, Republicrats, Romney and Obama, take over of America, United States at Risk, US Constitution Leave a comment
Columbia, MO – June 15, 2012 – Remember the Borg from Star Trek: The Next Generation? The attempt to assimilate us is on, and you better be paying attention! I receive an e-mail from someone in the Maryland GOP concerning a speech given by Karl Rove at the MD GOP’s Red, White and Blue dinner. Apparently Rove is calling for support to make Maryland a two-party state!
The person sending the e-mail is just someone in the “chain” forwarding the “patriot” call to action. They want “patriots” who believe in limited federal government, fiscal responsibility, lower taxes, sound money, individual responsibility, economic and personal liberty, American independence and national sovereignty, to attend the monthly central committee meetings of either the Republicans or Democrats.
There is no other choice, given the e-mail, than to conclude the Republicans and Democrats are working in collusion to stamp out independent political thought in this country. I can only guess it is has something to do with the HUGE support from those of all political ideologies for Ron Paul and their fervent desire to see him run on a third party ticket. This country wasn’t designed around party politics! The Republicans are no better than the Democrats at anything they listed. They’re both responsible for stripping the American population of precious liberties and for the misinterpretation and subversion of our Constitution. They’ve failed us miserably!
Republicans, and dissatisfied Democrats, had an opportunity to reach out to the people, but they chose not to take it. Not by not nominating Ron Paul for president, but by excluding him and his supporters and their honest desire to return to the Constitution. Both claimed they wanted to return to our constitutional principles, but it’s painfully clear neither has any intention of doing such. Until they do, I will continue to look elsewhere for candidates to support.
They want to farther suppress the opinions of liberty-loving truth seekers by stifling our politically diverse thinking. They don’t care about our right to choose our political ideals. They only care about providing us with their version of a “choice”, which is no choice at all. It’s an easier way to control politics, something of which they can take FULL control.
Ron Paul may (or may not!!!) be out of the race, but we still have choices. This movement grew because we had a national voice, and we’re all still here!!! We aren’t defeated unless we give up! I don’t know about you, but I am not backing down. It’s time to ask ourselves some VERY important questions. Do we want to fall in line behind the likes of Romney and Obama, or are we going to stand up to the machine? Are we going to fight for our rights, or are we going to be complacent and lose even more freedom? Do you REALLY believe in liberty and justice for all or are those patriotic words that make you feel better in the moment?
There is something you can do. Understand what’s going on. Unlearn what you’ve been taught in the public schools and educate yourself. There are well-researched documentaries out there to help you on your quest for truth and freedom. Don’t Tread On Me and Blood of Patriots talk candidly about the 9th and 10th Amendments and our Bill of Rights, respectively. Camp FEMA and Enemy of the State talk about possible internment and the plans in place to control your every move. You can believe the media lies, or learn what’s really going on!
It’s time for you to figure out what you believe and get involved. Otherwise, you will be left with nothing, and they will have all the power. Believe me, it is going to be a whole lot easier to stand up for yourselves before they take your freedom, than to do it afterwards! When it’s taken, it will be even harder to get back…we’ll have been assimilated and by that time, resistance will be futile!
Article and political system news by By Debbie Lewis
Note comment: This has been a horse and pony type of elections and clearly the congress is no longer truly representing the interests of the people but that of mostly special interests. As a precinct leader it is my duty to inform that we no longer operate as a Constitutional Republic and it has come under attention that congress even allocated $$$ money for Nanotechnology and some of those projects WILL alter natural biology and in my opinion an Abomination for that is un-Godly and Un-natural and jeopardizes our right to self-shield. Also, there are way too many catastrophes which seem to be more for harnessing further power thrumping the Bill of Rights and trampling over our once beautiful Constituional Republic and its independent citizens. America as it stands will die if we do not change course and get a decent truthful leader or if we do not ask for these self-declared dictators to step down for they are hurting the American public. Bad enough we cant even breathe here in Colorado from fire smoke further deteriorating our health as if Rome is burning. If nothing gets done then I guess we all march to the other side to the Brave New World which is of Top Down Leadership incrementally taking over all of our rights to include water, land, air and food.
Partnership with corrupt governments? we are the only Constitutional Republic not a plain democracy and VOTERS did not vote to merge their independence and sovereign nation with that of others under so call Special Ops with guns, ammo, helicopters, drones etc, which are not cute
but deadly and more aligned with Dictatorships and Tyrannical governments- next Nato wishes to go to South America? like their special interests and Corps. dollars plus one-worlders funding $$$ not caused enough harm and death on northen hemisphere with Radiation, oil spills, wifi house wireless meters “Technocracy must be seen for what it is: An attempt to impose a totalitarian, scientific dictatorship. In 1933, it called for the inaguration of Franklin Delano Roosevelt as dictator in order to “pave the way for economic revolution.” (AugustForecast.com, Technocracy Grid) , tweaking natural biology with nanotech endorsed without people’s informed consent, natural weather tweaking regardless of health changes to people
and fire catastrophes in the northern hemisphere? America’s gov. then has officially been taken over under the “guise” of Regionalism, fake “free trade” that over- rides individual or sovereign nations
health safety with altered seeds etc,
so call cooperation with what seems a global army being able to deploy in any region or area of the world? This is very disturbing for no one has voted nor consented for these super powers over individual people’s
rights and to self-shield from body harm not just of America but the world.
For more info about the films and to get your copy, visit William Lewis Films Catalog Page
Image .Reality zone.com, (2012) Retrieved from http://www.realityzone.com/currentperiod.html
Article Political Diversity at Risk? by Debbie Lewis. Columbia: MO
March 6, 2012
Pray for your candidates and review their material carefully; especially since at elections many more promises could get made but not followed. The reality is that the interests of the people are not being served and our nation and local communities are incrementally taken towards inimical agendas not aligned with a Constitutional Republic nor the American way of life. Each year we have lost rights to our land, water, air quality, liberties and current economic stability.
March 5, 2012
E-mail blast on Presidential candidates record on gun control issues by Dudly Brown:
With “Super Tuesday” voting just hours away, I want to make sure you are fully aware of the gun rights records of each Republican candidate for President.
As you know, NAGR has mailed every candidate for President an official NAGR Gun Rights Survey.
Ron Paul is the only remaining Republican candidate who has returned his survey 100% in favor of gun rights.
Over the last few weeks and months, I’ve asked you to call the campaigns of Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum, and Newt Gingrich to demand that each candidate return their gun rights survey 100% in favor of the Second Amendment.
Believe me, your calls worked.
Repesentatives from each of those campaigns called NAGR offices demanding we instruct our members and supporters to stop calling and to send them another copy of the survey.
Each candidate has the NAGR Presidential Survey in hand — but Romney, Santorum and Gingrich are still stonewalling gun owners by refusing to respond.
Each of the remaining candidates needs to know that gun owners have a powerful voice and we assume that silence is a sign they are hiding an anti-gun position.
I have serious concerns about Romney, Santorum, and Gingrich.
It’s their long anti-gun records that worry me.
Let me take a minute or two right now to remind you of the anti-gun positions of the three Presidential candidates who have so far refused to return their National Association for Gun Rights Presidential Survey.
So far, Mitt Romney has refused to respond to his NAGR Gun Rights Survey, perhaps because when Romney was Governor of ultra-liberal Massachusetts he signed a bill to ban an entire class of firearms.
Would he do the same thing — or even worse — as President of the United States? His record indicates that he would.
Mitt Romney supports the Brady Registration Act, mandatory 5-day waiting periods, mandatory firearms ID cards, the Federal Feinstein Gun Ban (so-called “assault weapons ban”) and he signed the Massachusetts Semi-Auto Ban in 2004.
He even went as far as to say that he supported Massachusetts’ tough anti-gun laws: “We do have tough gun laws in Massachusetts; I support them… I won’t chip away at them; I believe they protect us and provide for our safety.”
And to throw fuel on top of Mitt Romney’s anti-gun fire, he received the endorsement of John McCain recently, who himself has recorded promotional commercials for anti-gun groups hell-bent on restricting our Second Amendment rights.
If you’ve watched any of the Presidential debates, you’ve noticed that Rick Santorum claims time and again to be a “fighter” who has “led on conservative issues.”
Rick Santorum’s record on the Second Amendment, however, tells a different story.
In the 90s, he voted to support the Lautenberg Gun Ban, which stripped law-abiding gun owners of their Second Amendment rights for life, simply because they spanked their children or did nothing more than grab a spouses wrist.
He voted for a bill in 1999 disguised as an attempt to increase penalties on drug traffickers with guns… but it also included a provision to require federal background checks at gun shows.
In 2000, Santorum voted to force pawn shops to require a background check on anyone coming into the store to sell a firearm.
And then he voted with gun-controlling Democrats Dianne Fienstein and Frank Lautenberg to mandate locks on handguns in 2005.
But worst of all, Rick Santorum has a storied history of bailing out anti-gun Republicans facing reelection.
Rick Santorum came to anti-gun Arlen Specter’s defense in 2004 when he was down in the polls against pro-gun Republican Pat Toomey. Specter won and continued to push for gun control during his years in the Senate.
He also supported and openly campaigned for anti-gun New Jersey governor, Christine Todd Whitman.
It certainly appears that Rick Santorum has no regrets about his past anti-gun record. Worse, it appears he’d be happy to continue along this path as President.
For those who have followed Newt Gingrich’s career, the revelation that he talks out of both sides of his mouth won’t be a surprise.
Despite claiming to be pro-gun, Newt Gingrich’s reign as Speaker was downright hostile to our Second Amendment rights.
Newt supports the Brady National Gun Registry, a national biometric thumbprint database for gun purchasers, the Lautenberg Gun Ban and the “Criminal Safezones Act.”
Newt doesn’t think the Brady Instant Gun Registry goes far enough — he wants thumbprints:
“I think we prefer to go to instant check on an immediate basis and try to accelerate implementing instant checks so that you could literally check by thumbprint… Instant check is a much better system than the Brady process.” — June 27, 1997
Gingrich may claim to be pro-gun . . .
But his record indicates otherwise, and his refusal to answer his NAGR Gun Rights Survey should give any Second Amendment supporter cause for concern.
You and I know we have the most anti-gun President in the history of our country right now in the Oval Office . . .
. . . but perhaps even more dangerous would be a Republican in the Oval Office with a proven anti-gun history of cutting backroom, anti-gun deals.
February 18, 2012
Many of us may believe that we live in a Constitutional Republic; however the people’s voice and concerns are not being heard nor taken into consideration. We have many incumbents rubber stamping the status quo coming out of dysfunctional Washington D.C. and there is a cozy relationship developing not allowing new ideas or ways at dealing with problems such as what to do independently from the Top Tier dysfuntional directives which are not truly the people’s voice but those of the United Nations, Pentagon, Council and Foreign dis-Relations (CFR), EPA, FDA, etc along with the many other special interests of alphabet soup to include quasi-governmental non-profit organizations or Foundations that is all about profits but claim otherwise and are not aligned with the interests of the voters nor the American people in general.
We have so called health care exchanges which are inside Obamacare that are but a stepping stone to full health care mandates which one could think of a million reasons NOT to have so called government involved in health care when in reality 98% of the time act unethically and corruptly and with that plan money from that system going into “research” which God help us for when they say “research” one could bet its for some so called “health transformation system” written about that could be used to ready the future for the push in Nanotechnology, Singularity (by definition its when human and machine via nano and other technologies merge and irreversible or when being human is snuffed out by technocrats fixated in creating a technocracy society with smart meters playing an initial role) and who knows what other strange un-Christian or un-Godly projects. Please note that once these transformations get implemented humanity becomes more like working robots and since part machine wont object to being used like a working ants for the top tier of plutocrats. This is very un-American but as shown being endorsed by many political figures that hope to make money on this via investments. Why would Obama be included along with former President Clinton, Ret. Colonel Powell and other politicos in a film about a near future world in Nanotechonology which is under current research titled The Transcendant Man? Under who’s permission or consent do these special interests claim to be transforming our world? There are many that do not wish to become part of this power grab over the individual and or right to be sovereign secure in their person and in their property. The last thing America needs is a “health mandate” when so many other actions on their part are destroying our economy, our sovereignty, independence, health, way of life, future of our children and once more respectful of itself and others Republic.
Voting has become a horse & pony show in which sincere individuals trying to make a difference cant’ since media, radio, powerful special interests, foreign governments and status quo incumbents at all levels continue to rubber stamp America to oblivion and destruction. Almost 70% of what media says is partly false, made-up or embellished for special interests benefit purposes taking us each year and each election farther away from our roots, system of checks & balances, independence and functioning economy. Many precincts have no leaders for it is extremely dysfunctional dealing with the games, nonsense, sham, incumbents and establishment people that no matter how much more America sinks down continue to place the interests of special groups or lobby to include religions and foreign goverments ahead of their own no matter how detrimental the path seems to be.
When asking how is that even agenda 21 which may take away our property rights via public private partnerships and other centralization of business organizations or local government independence projects the answer given is that it is the “free market” or when asking about how is it that in Iraq leaders in US allow Monsanto to take power of seeds with their genetic modified forms which if they continue to harness the global seed market can jeopardize the entire planet many answer that it is our “free Market system” etc. Well in my opinion this is not free market but looting of other sovereign economies to include later our own for the love of money in itself has no mother land. Almost everything under the sun seems to be for sale with many nations in Europe collapzing, the middle east, part of south America and in the end God protect us from this mess perhaps our Nation as the last piece of the puzzle. In the end we could end up with a global centralized goverment in the hands of the few managed by powerful banking (profits over interests of citizens) and self-declared autocrats. This not a functioning “free-market” but a managed market by World Trade Organization that 90% of the time bypasses the sovereign independent nation-states standing rule of law directives, banking, corrupt technocrats and or autocrats with no loyalty to the electorate of any nation. This looks more like a scientific dictatorship developing vs. the so called that they are spreading democracy across the world. There is a difference between responsible capitalism and abuse. There is a difference between a Constitutional Republic with true representation of its people vs. fake democracy for special central elites across the world.
I refuse to give any legitimacy to the current voting system and the day will come when America for its own safety may have to ask these corrupt leaders to step-down or we will all perish to death at their hands.
I do not see any party as sincerely wishing to improve America but looting it and deceiving it with the many orchestrations. I will be closing this blog for I no longer feel that the “establishment” in the party are aligned with the values they claim to hold nor do most truly fighting for the wellness of their citizens but a super minority that often takes abuse from top tier. I would vote out all incumbents and try to do all possible to improve the economy and independece of each of our states across the United States but the Voting system in place is no longer legitimate and pre-determined by those owning the media and infamous Rothchild family which by the way bought a weather service company in the state of Wisconsin and could profit from our weather demise and later control for more profit under control of people climate change. Enough said and plan to stay away from this dysfuntional non-repesentative of the people voting system and often self-serving going along with America’s demise party. Something has to be done to rectify this problem and the people must educate themselves very quickly in coming up with answers for our time is running out since we are reaching incrementally each year a possible irreversible future checkmate.
February 7, 2012
Caucus Place: Stetson Hills Elementary, 4910 Jedediah Smith Road, Colorado Springs, CO 80922
Precinct 391 is now new Precinct 405
Senate District: 10
Commissioner District: CC2
Bobby James, HD15 Chair
Linda Shannon HD15 Vice-Chair
Vicki Broerman HD 15 Secretary
Ryan Parsell, CD2 Chair
Chuck Broerman, CD2 Vice-Chair
Nielsen, CD2 Secretary
By now, odds are that you’ve heard from me either with a flier at your door, or a call reminding you of the time and place of this caucus. Thank you for coming to this opportunity to make a difference at the grassroots level. I have attended the official GOP El Paso County precinct training since 2008 to present, and I would appreciate your vote for me today as a Precinct 405 committeeperson (one of two positions), and/or also as a delegate to El Paso County Assembly, and or State assembly, Congressional, and Judicial Assemblies, respectively so that I can cast votes to keep freedom-oriented conservatives on upcoming primary and general election ballots. In addition to these votes, I hope that you will vote in favor of the following resolutions. When similar resolutions are approved by like-minded Republicans, at precincts across the state of Colorado, they will have the power to help set the agenda for our party on your behalf. Thank you for your consideration.
Theresa Nielsen, Business owner, independent contractor and member of Republican Party
Right to Shield from body harm and to be secured in our persons and private Property in Colorado Whereas, Our Constitution states that we as a people have the right to be secured in our person and in our private property be it that Chemical aerosols coming from the sky via military type aircraft of undisclosed origin and spray materials landing into our yards, place of business and land harming crops, human and animal health be stopped and made illegal in the State of Colorado;especially without population informed consent for such actions impact our citizens health and ability to earn future income.
Whereas, the government should protect its citizens from unreasonable environmental hazards and controls which could give advantage to competitors and interfere with Colorado citizens ability to have access to their own health, ability to grow their crops and animals and in not being compensated for loss of income but conducting these secretive activities without proper informed consent. Whereas, the U.S. Department of Defense or other undisclosed aircraft should not have orders to spray civilians with any kind of undisclosed aerosols that affect animal and human health for it it out of their jurisdiction to spray civilian populations without proper disclosure nor in willing to disclose about its contents, country of origen or spray dates timelines. Whereas, all states have the right to protect their offspring, health, land, farms and future ability to earn income from daily activities which are being harmed by aerosols these activities are out of their jurisdiction and power.
Therefore, Be it resolved that, it shall be the position of the Republican Party, its members and elected officials must work to dramatically limit the ability of federal government to destroy states sovereign right to farm, breathe clean air, earn income from ranching and other daily activities impacted by such actions of hazards chemical aerosols emanating from such aircraft as evidenced by population and to have the right to refuse such assaults to our citizenry in having the ability to be secure in their person and private property that all aerosol sprays coming from the sky be stopped immediately and made illegal and a threat to our right to self-shield and protect ourselves from harm as stated in our second amendment as an assault to our person and right to shield from external harm.
Votes for this resolution _______
Votes against this resolution _______
Life and Liberty Resolution
Whereas, the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness is at the heart of our American ideals in this constitutional Republic, and
Whereas, federal court judges threaten this Republic through activist reinterpretation of its Constitution and have legalized the deaths of over forty million unborn Americans;
Therefore, Be it resolved that, it shall be the position of the Republican Party and its elected officials to support the passage of legislation, which would serve to reinforce the 10th amendment to our U.S. Constitution and negate the effect of Roe v Wade by removing the ability of federal courts to interfere with state legislation to protect life.
Votes for this resolution _______
Votes against this resolution _______
Border Security and Immigration Resolution
Whereas, a nation without secure borders is no nation at all; it makes no sense to fight terrorists abroad when our own front door is left unlocked, and
Whereas, the current system is incoherent, unenforced, and unfair, and current reform proposals would allow up to 60 million more immigrants into our country; and as long as illegal immigrants think that their illegality will be rewarded, the incentive to enter the U.S. illegally will remain strong.
Whereas, immigrants from all countries should face the same rules and waiting periods, and immigration officials should track visa holders and deport anyone who overstays their visa or otherwise violates U.S. law, such as a number of 9/11 terrorists who had expired visas.
Therefore, Be it resolved that, it is the position of the Republican Party and its elected officials, that we must secure our borders now through the following steps:
•First and foremost, physically secure our borders and coastlines.
•Second, fully enforce existing visa rules.
•Third, oppose amnesty in any form.
•Fourth, adopt English as the official language of the United States.
Votes for this resolution _______
Votes against this resolution _______
Oath of Office Resolution
Whereas, the people, through the Union of free and independent states of the United States of America, ordained, established and ratified the Federal Constitution as the “supreme law of the land” and
Whereas, the People are expected to enforce that Constitution and hold all public servants accountable to their oath of office to obey said Constitution, in the case of city, county and state public servants, the state constitution as well, and
Whereas, the oath of office implies an understanding of our U.S. Constitution and (except for federally elected positions) each state constitution as well,
Therefore, Be it resolved that, the Republican Party and all of its members will support, defend, enforce and obey the literal meaning and original intent of the U.S. Constitution and, in the case of city, county and state public servants, of their state constitution as well.
Votes for this resolution _______
Votes against this resolution _______
Debt and Taxes Resolution
Whereas, conservatives have always supported low taxes and low spending and have endeavored to enforce the principles of limited government as written in the U.S. Constitution,
Whereas, the U.S.A. is in trillion dollars in debt as a nation and that mounting government debt endangers the financial future of our children and grandchildren, and
Whereas, the Federal Reserve, a private central bank run by unelected officials, fosters runaway debt by increasing the money supply at will — making each dollar in our pockets and bank accounts worth less, and
Whereas, our economy and our very independence as a nation is increasingly in the hands of foreign governments such as China and Saudi Arabia, because their central banks also finance our runaway spending, and
Therefore, Be it resolved that, it is the position of the Republican Party that the United States of America cannot continue to allow private central banks, wasteful agencies, lobbyists, and governments collecting foreign aid, to dictate the size of our ballooning budget, and that spending must once again be prioritized and specified as directed by our U.S. Constitution.Votes for this resolution _______
Votes against this resolution _______
January 31, 2012
Subject: FW: Time to Face the Facts
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012
From: Charlotte Iserbyt Author of the dumbing down of America and former Ronald Reagan Department of EducationPolicy Advidor.
Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt
Former Senior Policy Advisor
U.S. Department of Education
In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way. ~Franklin D. Roosevelt
Time to face the facts. What the GOP fears most is what America needs most.
Neither Santorum nor Gingrich can win the Nomination for one simple reason. Neither of them can collect enough delegates to win the Nomination.
Neither man can be the nominee because neither one was able to get on enough states’ ballots to make a difference. (564 delegates that Newt can’t win ), Same with Santorum (over 700 delegates he can’t win ). And the media as well as the GOP is praying to god that the American people continue to remain ignorant of this fact for as long as possible while they try to come up with a strategy that will bury Ron Paul before Romney is forced to face him on stage alone and the commentators are no longer able to marginalize Paul by giving all the questions to everyone but him.
Ron Paul and Mitt Romney are the only two candidates that made it on the ballot in every state. Romney will not beat Obama, he’s too similar except he will raise taxes on anyone making 40k a year or less in favor of giving himself lower taxes. Independents are going to run to Obama if Romney is the alternative.
It is a two man race between Ron Paul and Romney for the nomination.
It is also a two man race between Ron Paul and Obama for the White House.
It’s time Conservatives and people with any functioning brain cells in their heads started backing the only real candidate that will beat Obama and save America. And whether you like it or not, that candidate is, by default, Ron Paul.
The facts can’t be twisted to point in any other direction. The Delegates decide who gets the nomination and you can’t get delegates if you aren’t on the ballots. It doesn’t matter how much money gets pumped into your campaign by special interest groups. The facts are the facts.
Fact : Gingrich and Santorum cannot win the nomination no matter how much they get in ” popular ” votes.
Fact : Romney will fail epically against Obama in a general election.
Fact : Ron Paul will decimate Obama on his Foreign Policy stance alone. Add in his Economic and Defense policies ( All 3 of which were policies Obama ran on in 2008 and abandoned once he got in the White House so no one would be stupid enough to believe he’s going to follow them in his second term ) and you have an un-beatable candidate in the general election who the bulk of the American people will vote for when they finally get a chance to see the man unfiltered and unbiased by the media.
America is broke and the average American is tired of hearing about another war on the horizon and seeing more dead soldiers coming home in coffins for no reason…all the while the freedoms they are dying to ” protect ” are being stripped away from us by our own government…one by one.
Obama has 0 chance of beating Paul and Washington knows it. The GOP knows it. The corporations that own Washington know it too so they instruct the media outlets they own to hide it from you.
But now you know. Gingrich and Santorum are mathematically incapable of winning the Nomination and Romney can’t beat Obama in the general election.
Ron Paul is the only choice we have. It’s just nice that, for once, he’s the RIGHT choice and not just the ” lesser of two evils “.
The World Will Not Be Destroyed By Those Who Do Evil,
But By Those Who Watch Them Without Doing Anything.
— Albert Einstein (Intelhub.com, 2011).
Some Issues with Newt:
His investors in the health transformation research group of undisclosed investors-Reason for Newt stance with Pelosi on “health care exchanges” stepping stone to Obamo-care-which has provisions for $$$ money to go to “research” where they can then “transform” or “enhance” health-care(never about health but plain Corp. profits) or humans under the guise of “health reform” which is NOT but post-humanism (trans-humanism) tied in push to destroy family life-“Our clients are made up of org…
• (GingrishGroup.com, 2012).The Center is a non-partisan collaboration of leaders dedicated to the creation of a 21st Century Intelligent Health System that saves lives and saves money for every American.
Trans-humanism- advocates the use of emerging transforming technologies to enhance humans. (Newt’s Atlanta chairing of nanotechnology conference audience consisted of investors’, scientists, and digital tech persons.
• Gingrich Group LLC/Center for Health Transformation Statement in Response to Recent Press Inquiries
Due to confidentiality clauses in our contracts, we are not releasing a list of our clients and members or information specific to any individual client or member. However, we are releasing this document to provide information about the Gingrich Group LLC and the Center for Health Transformation, including overall revenue, scope and accomplishments (Gingrish Group, 2011).
This health transformation involves also the transformation and control of weather which is in itself Un-Godly for only our creator in my opinion along with natural Law of the Universe should naturally allow climate to occur. Big banking and elitists in government wish to control weather and later popluations under some United Nation central gov. Universal Health Care (note the intent is in the name). I could name thousands of reasons to NOT allow governments to dictate “health care for they have history of long corruption and could be used against the population itself to control them or other inimical reasons. Think Cambodia and many other central Totalitarian regimes controllers killed millions of their population via control measures such as farming, industries, health care, education etc. Please open your eyes and do research on all candidates . Other: Newt Issues Click here- No to Newt.com
January 27, 2012
Uncategorized 2012, 4910 Jedediah Smith Rd, Caucus Agenda, Caucus February 7th, Colorado Caucus, Colorado Springs Voting, Colorado State holds its GOP Caucus, elections, Go Vote Colorado, Precinct 391, Precinct 405, Republican Caucus, Stetson Hills Elementary, Voting information Leave a comment
Prior Precinct 391 is now new precinct # 405 and its Republican Caucus is February 7th on a Tuesday evening at 7:00 p.m. at Stetson Hills Elementary. Please attend and show you care about your country and the grassroots process. Thank you.
Stetson Hill Elementary is still the Caucus and public voting area for this district.
Feb. 7, 2012 Colorado Springs, Caucus at 7:00 p.m.
Precinct:5101521405Caucus Location:Stetson Elementary
Address:4910 Jedediah Smith RdCity:Colorado Springs 80922
* Caucus begins at 7:00pm. Please arrive 30-45 minutes early.
* Some counties may require photo identification to participate.
* Only those voters that were registered Republicans by the deadline are eligible to participate.
* Those eligible to participate in this caucus are eligible to be elected as a precinct committee person and/or as a delegate to county and higher district assemblies.
•Pledge ofSign-in and verify registered voters in attendance
•Elect caucus chair, secretary and tellers (one night only)
•Chair (leader): runs the caucus meeting
•Secretary: completes paperwork
•Tellers: tally the votes
•Begin passing caucus donations envelope
•Elect two precinct committee-people (2 year commitment)
•Presidential candidate discussion (not required) and straw poll
•Elect delegates and an equal number of alternates to higher assemblies
•Recruit Election Judges
•Recruit Precinct volunteers to help Precinct leaders
•Solicit ongoing donations to the county Republican Party
January 27, 2012
Uncategorized candidates challenging incumbents, Colorado's 5th Congressional District, County Commissioner District 2, new candidates challenging incumbents, PhilMcDonald4CountyCommissionerD2, precinct 368 colorado, Precinct 405, Robert Blaha for Congress Leave a comment
The new candidates challenging incumbents information is below. Any new candidates running please send us your information via e-mail. Thanks!
Phil McDonald for County Commissioner website, click here-McDonald Campaign.com
Robert Blaha for Congress webpage, Click here-Robert for Congress.com Local citizens could donate or volunteer for new candidates for every small effort helps and this will encourage existing and new candidates to work harder and do a better job for the community.
January 21, 2012
Public and Private Partnerships seems to be the new buzz word used; especially when local governments lose funds after the so many by design bail-outs and off-shoring (fake free-trade which is not but managed by WTO world trade organization with its supra-national powers takes over our sovereign independent directives, another stepping stone to centralize world government it seems likely); which to aggravate the situation even worse Obama is merging the small business administration with the Dept. of commerce among others that will later tie our independent sovereign small business sector with the new collapsing by design International but today global, (cute word for globalist-lets centralize all governments into one these days for they know word globalist worked against their initial goals, (good 4 big banks & elitists) but not the working people or independent producers, business owners or workers. Public Private Partnership is but a stepping stone to get the big global players incrementally to put money in the tin eventually taking or buying out via purchasing $$$ power local county and governments assets. Its a bit long to explain but the videos below if patient enough will explain it. The ultimate goal is that it will be easier for Agenda 21 to take hold and guess what we lose? our rights to private property and we all become “serfs” to the centralizers. Why should the U.S. even consider merging small business areas when Europe is collapsing from the plundering of each prior independtly wealthy and self-responsible nation states? Like snake charmers local communities tend to fall for it since it sounds benign but in the later term it truly is not. This area needs more research and someone should volunteer for its a longer masked problem and this area is still new but incrementally taking our local governmental organizations. The firing range at Fort Carson has the Public/Private Partnership so called “collaboration” between government and private individuals from the community and one needs to learn or study the ability of our County Sheriff to be able to remain the true carrier of our law of the land. The county Sheriff is the true Representative of the People in his community and county. No Federal land taking of locals could take place for the county Sheriff has the right to protect the private property of his constituents. Please be careful and study close this issue duing our incoming elections. Lets not fall into possible traps that may take our private property rights and Agenda 21 snake charmers are out there giving their soft-sales pitch.
Video I on Public-Private Partnerships, What is?
Part 2 Public-Private Partnerships, What is?
January 17, 2012
Uncategorized 2012 Colorado Springs, Caucus, Caucus Training, Colorado find precinct, Colorado Precinct Map, Colorado voting, Feb. 7, New Precinct number 405, Precinct 368, Precinct 391, Precinct 405, Voting precinct 405 Leave a comment
Due to neighborhod growth and new county district map; precinct 391 which was formerly voting precinct 368 has become a new voting precinct number 405. Stetson Hill Elementary is still the Caucus and public voting area for this district.
Feb. 7, 2012 Colorado Springs, Caucus-
January 21rst Central Committee meeting Election of new House and Senate district officers
• Election of division leader
January 15th- February 1st Caucus Training – Times, dates and locations to be announced later
FEBRUARY 7th-7 PM CAUCUSESMarch 17th – County Assembly at UCCS
April/14th -State Assembly in Denver
May 29th – Last day to register to vote in the Primary
June 26th PRIMARY ELECTION
September- WALKYOUR PRECINCT FOR ENTIREREPUBLICANSLATE- (Coordinate dates with
October 9th – Last day to register to vote in the General Election
WEEKENDOF OCTOBER13th- MAJORWALKS!!!! – Clear your calendar
October 15th – first day to mail ballots to voters
WEEKEND OF OCTOBER 20th – MAJORWALK!!!!!- Clear your Calendar
WEEKEND OF NOVEMBER 3rd – GOTV- Clear your calendar
NOVEMBER6TH- ELECTIONDAY- as many as possible for as much of the day as possible (noon on is most important).
FAQ: Republican Precinct Caucus InformationWhen is the Republican Precinct Caucus?-Colorado Republican Precinct caucuses will be held throughout the state on the first Tuesday in February – on February 7, 2012 – beginning promptly at 7:00 pm. We recommend that participants arrive at their designated Precinct Caucus location no later than 6:30 pm to allow for registration and check-in.
What is a Precinct Caucus?-Precinct Caucuses are held every two years, and are essentially neighborhood meetings of the registered Republican electors who live in the same precinct. The primary purposes of the Precinct Caucus are to elect local representatives of the Republican Party (called “precinct committeepersons”) and to select and delegates to political party assemblies that will then designate Republican candidates to the Primary Election ballot. In Presidential Election years, eligible Precinct Caucus voters also participate in a non-binding Presidential Preference Poll.
Am I eligible to vote in the Republican precinct caucus?-You must be a registered Colorado voter, affiliated with the Republican Party no later than December 7, 2011 (at least two months prior to the Precinct Caucus).
-You must also have been a resident of your precinct for at least thirty (30) days. If you moved into the precinct or registered to vote less than thirty days prior to the Precinct Caucuses, you must attend the precinct caucus that corresponds to your prior address, but you may be ineligible to be elected as a delegate or precinct committeeperson.
-For key dates and additional information, please.
Where is my precinct caucus?-Most Precinct Caucus meetings are held in local schools, community meeting rooms, churches, and sometimes in private homes that are ADA-accessible. The Precinct Caucus location for your neighborhood is set by your local county Republican Party, and can be found on our Colorado Republican Caucus Assembly System website found at http://caucus.cologop.org
What happens at a precinct caucus?
-At every Precinct Caucus, the basic agenda is as follows:
-Elect a chairman and secretary to help run the caucus meeting that night;
-Vote in the Presidential Preference Poll, and tally and announce the results to caucus participants;
– Elect two precinct committeepersons who will serve as local officers of the Republican Party and help coordinate voter registration and get-out-the-vote efforts in the precinct for the next two years;
-Elect delegates and alternate delegates to the County Assembly, and in some cases to certain district assemblies and higher assemblies and conventions;
-Discuss, and approve or reject certain resolutions relating to the Party platform.
If I’m not a registered Republican voter can I still attend my Precinct Caucus as an observer?
-Yes you can attend as an observer, but you will not be allowed to vote in the Presidential Preference Poll or participate in the election of precinct committeepersons or delegates to political party assemblies.
FAQ: Delegate Information
What is a delegate and what do they do?
-Delegates and alternate delegates are elected by eligible Precinct Caucus voters to advance to their County Assembly, and potentially to certain higher assemblies including legislative and judicial district assemblies, Congressional district assemblies and the state assembly and convention. At these political party assemblies, delegates will vote to designate candidates to the 2012 Republican Primary Election ballot. Delegates selected at the Precinct Caucuses may but are not required to pledge their votes to their preferred candidates for elective office.
How do I become a delegate to the National Convention?
-Colorado is allowed to send 36 delegates and 33 alternate delegates to the Republican National Convention in Tampa, Florida on August 27-30, 2012. At each of Colorado’s seven congressional districts assemblies, 3 delegates and 3 alternate delegates are elected, and the remaining 12 delegates and 12 alternate delegates are elected at the Colorado Republican State Assembly and Convention held on April 14, 2012. The members of the Republican National Committee from Colorado are also delegates to the Republican National Convention.
Do I have to run as a pledged delegate for a specific presidential candidate?
-No. You can run as an unpledged delegate. However, if you wish to be considered as a candidate for National Delegate, you must be first elected as a delegate or alternate delegate to your local county assembly and to the State and/or Congressional District assembly from which you wish to be elected, and you must notify the Colorado Republican Party of your interest by filing a “National Delegate Intent Form” no later than thirteen (13) days prior to the State or Congressional District Assembly. You can obtain the “National Delegate Intent Form” from your local Republican party leaders on the day of your county assembly. Pledged candidates for National Delegate remain pledged to their candidate unless their candidate withdraws from the Presidential contest, releases their delegates, or is not nominated.
When and where is my:
-County Assembly: Please visit your local County Party website to find information regarding your county assembly location and meeting time. To find your county Party’s website.
-House District Assembly: to be announced
-Senate District Assembly: to be announced
-Congressional District Assembly: to be announced
-State Assembly: Ritchie Center, Denver University, Saturday, April 14, 2012
When and where is the National Convention?
-Tampa Bay Times Forum in Tampa, Florida on August 27-30, 2012.
FAQ: Candidate Information
When is the Republican Primary Election?-June 26, 2012
What are the residency requirements to be eligible to run for public office?
-Federal office (U.S. House) – Colorado Resident
-State Senate and State House – minimum 1 year residency within the district
How do I gain access the 2012 Republican Primary ballot?
-Republican candidates for partisan elective office may be designated to the Republican Primary Ballot by participating in the assembly process and securing at least 30% of the votes at the nominating assembly corresponding to their district. If a candidate receives less than 30% but more than 10% of the votes at the assembly, they can pursue Primary Election ballot access via petition. A candidate that receives less than 10% vote at the assembly is disqualified from the Primary Election ballot.
-Candidates have the option to not participate in the assembly process and instead petition signatures for Primary Election ballot access. The amount of signatures required depends on the size of the district’s electorate.
What is the deadline to declare my candidacy?A Republican candidate seeking access to the primary election ballot by assembly is not required to announce his or her candidacy in advance, and can simply volunteer at the designating assembly. Single-county legislative districts will hold their assemblies in connection with their county assemblies in mid- to late March. Multi-county district assemblies must happen after all applicable county assemblies, and will generally be after March 28 through April 13.
If no candidates are designated at the respective political party assemblies, there is a short window of time thereafter where political party assembly vacancy committees can designate a Republican candidate to the primary election ballot if there is a vacancy in designation. But if no candidate is designated to the primary ballot, then the chance to nominate a Republican candidate to oppose the Democrat in the general election is lost.
If a candidate wishes to bypass the caucus and assembly process, and seek access to the primary election ballot by petition, the first day to start circulating petitions is February 6th (the first Monday in February). Petitions must be submitted no later than April 2nd (no later than the 85th day before the primary election).
January 12, 2012
One continues to hear the same justifications for more war with most news outlets incrementally escalating their war news stories with Iran. Obama claims to be withdrawing troops from Iraq and Afghanistan but this is just a ploy to make it look as if he kept his promise while at the same time preparing us for the next planned war with Iran; after all it would be too obvious that it is insane to keep so many simultaneous wars at once or their real explanations with what seems to be a global dictatorial government forming in the backdrop, to those going without while funding these never ending conflicts. (Include Syria, Libya, and Egypt or Pakistan special ops with tax payers’ subsidies). I would buy the argument better if these poor selfish leaders would have at least taken the bother to improve the quality of the lives of the citizenry in general; however on the contrary, global corporations and governments have been working hand in glove with 24/7 surveillance monitoring to locals while growing exponentially in wealth with people growing in hardships, budget cuts, unemployment, and more austere measures affecting food prices, stability, and escalating crime rates. America is a Constitutional Republic and not just a so called plain “democracy” in which Oligarch’s can take over the rights and well-being individuals living in a community subjecting them to abuse. One cannot even travel for business without being subjected to invasive scanner machines and radar 24/7 monitoring system often ticketing those trying to go from point A to B to conduct business and even attempt at helping grow a local economy or possible future jobs. In the end, this dysfunctional system will end up with big Power Players at the top destroying each other like ferocious Piranhas’ while local economies dry up or die. Lets add to this scenario their silent forest genetic engineered tree plans, nanotechnology electronic family and post human trans-humanist society with the plans to effeminate all males; American males in particular who are gun owners under the dwindling 2nd Amendment; perhaps so no new offspring would ever arise to take back our once ethical and beautiful Constitutional Republic of liberty and Justice for all born with rights to be secured in their person and private property which by the way is being taken away deliberately under Agenda 21.
Poll after poll, only the cherry picked Presidential candidates get their name mentioned so as to imprint them in the minds of unsuspecting voters who are so busy working lots of jobs to stay afloat the economic madness. In the meantime plans are underway to even entangle the US economy with that of Europe further risking our economic stability and independence from their hope at a global elitist money making world Casino. All the mainstream candidates right or left support the plan for more war except for Dr. Ron Paul and more than likely due to the huge money involved and special lobby investment interests or religious cause stance they will win. The public should at least do lots of research for our future lives are at stake and learn more to see if these new wars are truly justified or pre-planned for some special global agenda. Is it truly to help humanity or to control all that lives along with their local assets or property? Are humans supposed to live in a subjugated manner or have self-determination with free will to choose? Do growing in power Oligarchs wish to eliminate all competition; especially via patents for life on earth alteration later controlling all that lives, exist and breathes often playing God or wishing to surpass Gods creation? Will they succeed at re-engineering or recreating all that lives to suit their own selfish personal interests? How is it that as citizens we have allowed so many corrupt vultures to take over our congress, media and entire governing system even at local levels? The real surprise is that many know that answers to all our problems do have solutions and published online but those ruling thirst for power and total control. Our government of checks & balances was good in that it was fair and allowing individuals who worked hard to excel but some took public office, served way too long and took it upon themselves to sell our Nation to others without our consent and with covert hidden agenda legislations such as the fake free-trade and Nafta nonsense destroying our ability to build for ourselves making us dependent on others.
Many see Mitt Romney as more sincere than Newt when it comes to religious belief for consistent and never endorsed a book or chaired a nanotechonolgy conference; however both have explored Obamacare areas.
Few examples of tweaked media results below among many not to include the name calling to supporters or disparaging remarks:
Question 8: Do you want to hear more from Ron Paul in the debate?
Thank you for voting!
Yes 68.33% (10,387 votes)
No 31.67% (4,814 votes)
Total Votes: 15,201
Return To Poll (YahooNews:incominglive poll during debate copy and pasted, Dianne Sawyer)
Question 6: Were you satisfied with Gingrich’s and Romney’s answers about health care mandates?
Thank you, we have already counted your vote.
Yes 28.6% (2,649 votes)
No 71.4% (6,614 votes)
Total Votes: 9,263
Return To Poll
Who won the 11/22/2011 CNN Republican National Security Debate?
Ron Paul…………………5497 votes………85%
Newt Gingrich…………….311 votes……….5%… More
Joyce Riley a Registered Nurse who has been a Director of Nursing of four institutions and has been a heart, lung, liver and kidney transplant nurse sent a public warning to Vets. She also served as a Captain in the USAF in support of Operation Desert Storm, flying active duty missions on a C-130 aircraft from Alaska to Cuba. She warns for soldiers being let go early from active duty to study the motives behind it since this could be an attempt at avoiding to pay them compensation at current or future incoming combat related illness. (Gulfwarvets.com, Joyce Riley R.N.). Note: Warns VA hospitals were receiving about 409 suicide calls per day and many do need their benefits plus ongoing help to decompress and return to community to get new work and not pass these costs to local government when federal policies took them to war and should care for them after goals accomplished. Below is the real voting record of Newt Gingrish which clearly shows he is no supporter of a Constitutional government for the United States but an Internationalist with global agendas not aligned with that of the American people nor tax payers or small business.
December 30, 2011
The last 3 digits are the precinct number, the 1rst digit is the congressional district, the 2nd & 3rd digit is the state senatorial district, the 4th & 5th digits is the state representative district, and the 6th & 7th digit is the county identifier assigned by the Secretary of State.
In the above example; precinct “001″ is now written as “5101621001″.
When looking for your precinct number concentrate at first in the last 3 digits, later your other information to learn more about your candidates and representatives or leadership. Do volunteer to help get out the vote for those who do not participate in politics will be ruled by those who do and maybe not in the voters best interest. We all must do our part to keep our Nation rule of law with checks & balances in government not like in the present were many representatives running for office are serving special interests, lobbyists, globalists etc, and NOT the American people nor our beautiful communities or families best interests. Please vote for each vote counts. Pray for your good leaders.
December 10, 2011
America is a country like no other and allowed criticism, innovation and even mis-interpretation but please protect it for I grow tired, hurt, bewildered and confused as to how America how has allowed itself to be taking for a ride and even abused but please take a second to take this country back and Not allow yourselves to be conquered since for the sake of your family and our future keep America Free and Independent. Please study your candidates very carefully for all of humanity is at stake.
Ask yourselves? What kind on “new” civilzation is being presented and is it truly better? Why is this book presenting a different type of family structure? Is this new candidate a statesman or just an investor looking to make a profit and sell America just like Obama?, We had the best form of government in the world so why change it? Why is this book endorsed by Newt and Left crowd Obama talk about in Chapter 17th of the Non-nuclear family? the child free culture? The “electronic” expanded family? Why the 2009 chairing of Nanotechnology and spraying of communities with chemtrails without public consent? What kind on new social engineering are they proposing and what is the effect on the future of our entire humanity? America has many enemies and is in great jeopardy. Take great care and VOTE wisely for our country is in great peril. Vote for the candidates that will help your country. I will not be intimidated and will continue to run for office for America is a Nation of all people not just selective fews manipulating our elections and intimidating leaders at the local level.
Merry Christmas and a super great New Year 2012
December 5, 2011
December 7th last day to register as Republican. Register here to VOTE.
January 14th Central Committee meeting• Election of new House and Senate district officers
• Election of division leader
January 15th- February 1st Caucus Training – Times, dates and locations to be announced later
FEBRUARY7TH-7 PM CAUCUSES
March 17th – County Assembly at UCCS
April/14th -State Assembly in Denver
May 29th – Last day to register to vote in the Primary
June 26th PRIMARY ELECTION
September- WALKYOUR PRECINCT FOR ENTIREREPUBLICANSLATE- (Coordinate dates with
October 9th – Last day to register to vote in the General Election
WEEKENDOF OCTOBER13th- MAJORWALKS!!!! – clear your calendar
October 15th – first day to mail ballots to voters
WEEKEND OF OCTOBER 20th – MAJORWALK!!!!!- clear your calendar
WEEKEND OF NOVEMBER 3rd – GOTV- clear your calendar
NOVEMBER6TH– ELECTIONDAY- as many as possible for as much of the day as possible (noon on is most important).
November 30, 2011
November 24, 2011
Uncategorized 3rd DNA strand, Aluminum contamination via chemtrail to bring in GMO aluminum resistant trees, Aluminum spray, aluminum toxicity, artificial environmental materials, biotech industry, California tree damage, Chemtrail weather modification, earth natural frequency, engineered biology patented, evolutionist 2007 London School of Economics 2 class system, GMO Aluminum resistant trees, GMO tree silent forest, GMO'eucalyptus Trees, London School of economics and evolution, nanobiotechnology, nanosensors, new DNA GNA and PNA, posthumanism, Researcher Sophia SmallStorm, smart dust, specimens that do not reproduce, specimens that repeat tasks, transhumanism, transhumanists, USDA Leave a comment
Problem, Reaction, and Solution is the method being used to bring in Nanotechnology which is in reality a step towards transhumanism. California is an important state for our food supply and the constant aluminum being sprayed over the years is affecting plants and trees. Researcher Sophia SmallStorm noticed heavy chemtrails near her property and started to do research with other nearby scientists that were experiencing similar problems with their fruit trees dying and or developing molds. It was discovered that the USDA had approved a batch of GMO (Genetic Modified) Eucalyptus trees to grow that were engineered (altered) to be resistant to Aluminum. Through further discovery they concluded that the constant aluminum spray over the years could have been to bring out a problem (trees dying) and then bring out for testing (GMO trees) to be like a solution which could forever change our entire ecosystem readying it for Nanatechology. Many other particules not found in nature (lab made) seem to be surfacing on our environment with some people experiencing a symptom called morgellons. Its almost like a Sci-fi novel but lab test and transhumanist writings seem to point in that direction for the wish of science to forge or transcend natural biology and society. Many of the GMO’ trees of the planned future will bear no fruit and be grown for a specific outcome. Is best to take notes and also learn that many elected officials are endorsing and even placing funds into these biological alterations of society and biology. Many of these decisions and spraying of particulate matter over the our US skies or private properties are being done without public consent or scrutiny nor in being able to verify the exact content of the materials being sprayed to include who are the manufacturers. Sad but true.
November 16, 2011
Uncategorized banking power grab, David Rockerfeller in 1973, General and Complete Disarmament, Geo-engineering, globalization, Liberty Gun Rights.com, Newt Gingrich, Nonotechnology, Public Law 101-216, public law 87-297, Second Amendment Committee, voting, Wars, weather manipulation Leave a comment
It seems that most candidates are serving the same special interests and as of late there is less difference on the issues among them except for Dr. Ron Paul and yes of course he is being totally blacked out of the media (so much for us being a true Democratic Republic, people in foreign lands perhaps have more democracy than us) and the only one not following the same path to more wars, globalization (centralization of power) and banking power grab from the people and the private sector.
Here is some info. on Newt Gingrich from Liberty Gun Rights:
Newt Gingrich is a possible contender in the future for the United States presidency. He is currently circulating a letter advertising a DVD called: “America at Risk” for which you may obtain a copy if you send him $35.00 or more. On page 3 of his six-page letter he says: “Today the choice is yours: You can either sit back and allow Barack Obama and the liberal elite to disarm our country, leaving us defenseless against enemies who explicitly desire to erase America from existence.”
Yet, if you check on the voting list of those who voted “yea” on Public Law 101-216 in 1989 (an update to the General and Complete Disarmament Law, Public Law 87-297) you will find that Newt Gingrich voted in favor of section 2 of this disarmament bill which reads:
“(2) as defined in this Act, the terms ‘arms control’ and ‘disarmament’ mean ‘the identification, verification, inspection, limitation,
control, reduction, or elimination, of armed forces and armaments of all kinds under international agreement to establish an
effective system of international control';”Should we trust a man who professes to be so concerned with our security and right to have armed forces, who also votes to give them away to the United Nations for a world army? The last thing we need is someone who professes to protect us, while at the same time, is planning to sell us out!Bernadine
Second Amendment Committee
on Public Law 101-216 More here, Public Law 101-216 (87-287 Freedom from War so banks owne it all).
Newt Gingrich-the Grench that stole American’s Christmas plus Nation and economy to Internationalist Globalists is more likely.
This document was written after WWII by bankers and special interests which many orquestrated these wars in the first place (Search Professor Anthony Sutton) then to come up with an excuse for World Disarmament so all Assets go to them the centralization of Power Grabbers as its happening now with their next World banking Collapse Orquestration.
More on why (getting rid of Nation States and Sovereignty) “Zbigniew Brzezinski, co-founder of the Trillateral Commission with David Rockerfeller in 1973, summed up the “network” in his 1970 Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era:
“The nation-state as a fundamental unit of man’s organized life has ceased to be the prin¬cipal cre-ative force: International banks and multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts of the nation-state.” [Emphasis added]
Unfortunately, this is the reality of the matter.
With interational banks at the center and various multinational companies in the periphery, the network continues to dominate and control the course of world events. The citizens of the respective countries are little more than objects to be taxed and manipulated.(The August review, 2011). So, under this so called future Dictatorship type of “Human Global Management” (yes, this is a United Nations, UN wacky document in which humans are no different than insects and the implications thereof), everyone will suffer the Jews, Whites, Blacks, Asians, Puerto Ricans, Russians, South Americans etc., for they are tweaking with their FRANKEN SCIENCE the planet earth like sociopaths.
Proof: Scientist concerned are researching for more BlueNOMore and Coalition Against Geo-engineering.
Well, why bother taking so much out of my time, losing income and ability to spend time with family? Well, what good is it when all that we work so hard for is at severe RISK? Under the Kyoto accord and now the new being tested kyoto card (Smart Grid future money replacement) we all become sitting ducks to bureaucrats who believe themselves above sovereign citizens and they are taking away our food supply integrity, land, water, health care, Nation, children and gambling with the entire econo-system since proof also surfaces that they are tweaking natural world biology (Creators Natural Order of the Universe) and using Nanotechnology, harmful radiofrequency with the Smart Meters, Genome alterations, Insects bio-engineered, GMO’s that harm our liver and that of our children, massive controversial global vaccination programs that also pose altering via DNA-viral added ingredients etc. etc, the list goes on…and watch out for Smart dust now landing in some of our yards… (Newt discussed on a video for had knowledge on some of these bio-engineering programs at a hearing held). It will surface later as nation keeps deteriorating.
About Public-Law 87-297 which takes away from our Second Amendment rights-and places us under a future United Nations total control-Read this research e-mail and visit Libertygunrights.com for more on subject.
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 8:09 AM
Subject: Library Question – Answer [Question #2643274]
Pub. L. 87-297 entitled Arms Control and Disarmament Act exists today; in fact, it has been amended several times and is codified in Title 22 of the United States Code, beginning with section 2551. If you would like to see the law as amended, you can use the United States Code . From the home page, click on Search the U. S. Code. On the following page, insert 22 in the space for Title, 2551 in the space for section, and click Search. On the following page will be a link 22 USC sec. 2551; click on it. The text of the codified law will be on the next page. To move from section to section, click on the arrows at the top and/or bottom of the page. If you would like to see a list of public laws that made up the code section, go to the set of parentheses labelled Source at the end of the Code section. You will see that some sections of the Act were amended as recently as the 107th Congress (2001/2002). Although the law remains in force, the agency was abolished and reorganized under the Secretary of State.
Hopefully, this information is helpful.
Law Library Public Services Division
Patron: To the American Memory Team:
Is public law 87-297 , The General and Complete Disarmament Law still in effect and is it real????
So, after WWII, they lie and allow our nation and military bases to deteriorate slowly and some fixed later to keep toppling nation states(BRAC Base gradual closure and Realignment still active, even hired new people in 2011). Purpose stated of BRAC, “(b) PURPOSE.–The purpose of this part is to provide a fair process that will result in the
timely closure and realignment of military installations inside the United States.” Click here, BRAC.gov; only to further their centralization world hemogeny since they are NOT concerned about our well-being but that of the banks (league of nations creators later called the UN and special interests) that allowed so many to include Camp Le Jeune have POISON water (hurting tons of Marine families killing many of their offspring) and at Fort Polk while I was walking my dogs a chlorine valve exploded that HURT me burning my skin but it affected me and my ability to get employment etc, and care for my two kids. Even today some interference in my ability to conduct my business pursuits have occured but I will continue to be successful and plan on making the Department of the Army compensate me and responsible for their lack of informed consent and cover up while I tried to get medical care; answers etc. and with their pet projects at Polk risking injury later covering up so as not to compensate. These people are COWARDS (globalists profiteers planners) and Do NOT care who Lives Nor DIES. Take it from me since I know by experience suffering at the yoke of their Madness and self-interests and profiteering. We need to protect our right to bear arms and protect ourselves; especially in the event that more poisons are unleashed to the general population. Education is mightier than force so no excuse for deliberate death is killing whether overtly, covertly or in plain sight;especially if for forming a global government behind the scenes that has no respect for the individual life or planet biology right to have its natural integrity and not altered for no scientist is God nor creator of the natural order of the Universe. Enough said, take action to save your local community before its too late to reverse the process. The madness against our Nation and our people has to end.
October 20, 2011
Vote on Election day November 1, 2011 or by mail ballot prior.
This is information from the League of Women Voters brochure and other pertinent information from other civic leaders view points for info. click here, Proposition 103: What is the cost to Taxpayers.
Againts the measure viewpoints:
Those opposed say:1. In this poor economy, the last thing families and small businesses can handle is yet another tax and fee burden. Proposition 103 presents an 8% increase in income taxes for individuals and corporations and a 3.4% increase in sales taxes over current levels –approximately a 7% increase in the government budget at a time when the economy is growing at less than 1%. The increased fees would also apply to monthly telephone and energy bills. Raising sales taxes burdens lower-income consumers the most because they spend a higher percentage of their overall budget on everyday necessities that are subject to sales tax.
Finally, Proposition 103 is a job killer with a projected 30,500 jobs lost over the next six years. Higher taxes on businesses mean less money to hire new employees, or to pay higher wages and benefits.
2. The petition was sold deceptively as a “rollback” to 1999 levels, but taxes were higher then. This theme of deception also tells taxpayers the money will go to education, but the increased taxes actually are deposited in the General Fund, which legislators may direct as they see fit. Although this proposal is sold as a temporary tax increase, will the fiscal climate change enough in five years to allow the elimination of these increases?
3. Until we really reform our educational system to meet the needs of the 21st century, it’s foolish to continue to throw the scarce resource of hard-earned money into a failing system. More money for schools has not improved student performance. We’re just paying more for teacher pensions and administration.
Those in favor say:
1. Investing in public education will lead to a stronger and quicker economic recovery. For Colorado to thrive, we need a well-educated workforce and good public schools that can attract quality businesses and good-paying jobs. Businesses value a robust public education system that provides an educated workforce, and employees want to live in communities with good schools for their children.
2. Our schools have experienced irresponsible and short-sighted cuts for three years, raising class sizes and reducing the educational opportunities for students. Our schools are now being asked to do more with less. Districts have been forced to close schools and lay off teachers, hurting education services and the local economy. Even before the recent budget cuts, Colorado ranked at the bottom of education funding, spending $1,781 less than the national average on k-12 students. The funding cuts to higher education have forced tuition to increase rapidly. Average tuition has increased 43 % over five years, making college less accessible for lower and middleclass families.
3. Now is the time to stop the drastic cuts and start reinvesting in our local schools and colleges to make Colorado competitive. Proposition 103 is a modest proposal which provides much needed relief from further education funding cuts, allowing policy makers, including voters, time to implement a long-term solution. By temporarily restoring the tax rates we had throughout the economic times of the 1990s and directing the revenue to education, Proposition 103 will provide the resources to begin reinvesting in our children’s.
Summary and some research material follows:
More debate into this matter needed to be done for the truth is that the more money that gets thrown into a problem the worst it seems to get such as the with the war on drugs, illiteracy, health system etc., with bureaucracies benefiting the most while the public pays for the increases. Why not leave the money in the parents pockets so they can purchase schools supplies, private tutoring, etc. vs. giving it to the government that often gives away TAX PAYERS money to foreign banks, foreign governments and to a plethora of foreign wars that buy weapons while our voters, schools and small business suffers; and who were once the pillars of the free-enterprise and local communities strength. As long as we indulge these mega spenders by allowing them to pass the brunt of their irresponsibility and reckless spending even syphoning our money with not audits or oversights the more that they will be encouraged to SPEND and SPEND some more. I would just send Bernanke a bill so we get some of our money that was vaporized back for our educational system. Also, some countries are outsourcing their students to the United States while they benefit by having no middle class but depleting the middle class in the US who have to pay for some of the bureaucrats wish of a future NORTH AMERICAN UNION that they wish by merging Canada, Mexico and the United States but have our schools and tax payers slowly paying for the process and the incremental integration. Tax Payers need to stand-up to the plundering our our General funds going into speculations and money vaporizing unfunded projects.
Excess taxation is becoming a form of serfdom and abuse to our rule of law. Also , many corporations are not paying any tax when going global and offshoring our jobs often forgeting to help our US communities. This is just my opinion but taxes on top of job loses does not make a lot of sense. Spending should be cut from the federal excess bureaucracies or departments that do nothing but incrementally take our Nation towards a global fiscal irresponsible form of central global government that has many money missing and countries bailing each other out perhaps leading to a world collapse. NO, we do not need to keep taking on the burden at tax payers shoulders and more solutions need to be studied not just placing the brunt of bureaucrats irresponsibility at the shoulders of barely working at a good job citizens.
Other information on job loss impact via domino effect video and view at your own discretion; especially after reading white paper on how these jobs may be lost or affect existing business, home owners or not.
October 6, 2011
The America "Freetopia" video is Kind of funny but so true and America's demise accelerating at a very rapid pace.
The Health Ranger (2011) What Happened in Freetopia?: A video Fable about what went wrong with America, Retrieved from YouTube.com
Tragedy & Hope.ning, (2011) Retrieved from http://tragedyandhope.ning.com/
September 24, 2011
These meters are called Smart Meters in California; however in other states they may go under another name. These meters according to some experts have a two way communication system which may violate US privacy rights. New research has been done on this and posted here as a pdf file by an expert on this area, Click here to learn more, Privacy Implications of Smart Meters.
Meters and future global grid Technocracy relationship; research by Patrick Wood:
Cheryl Dancey Balough. (2011). Privacy Implications of Smart Meters. Retrieved from
Patrick Wood. (2011). Youtube Presentation: Technocracy.
Patrick Wood. (2011). Technocracy. Retrieved from http://www.augustforecast.com/category/technocracy/
August 30, 2011
Uncategorized American history, carbon exchanges, experimental medicine, feudal system, feudalism, health, legal jargon deceptive terms, new financial system, Republican Form of government, self-shield, technocracy, Technotronic era Berzinski, vaccinations, Words in legal documents that could be deceptive Leave a comment
This article was contributed by a retired professional of law Joyce Rosenwald who is no longer with us on this precious earth due to illness and by other concerned US citizens shared via drop box who have been studying the origin of our problems from our original intended Constitutional Republican form of government that today is progressively threatened by those wishing to bring back a feudal system as in the days of old world history which was the original intent all along to deceive the people since our revolutionary war in 1776. It is important to learn that in the event this country ever gets taken back from the many inimical interests; the very next day they will once again attempt to deceive and even a minor term or word in the fine print could be used to once again deceive the masses and this must not be allowed to occur for humanity in general will once again embark on a path to unneccessary suffering. The new in the works feudal system (accelerating under right vs. left confusing the masses electoral process) will be even more bizarre than the ones of days of old for the entire world resources will be owned by the few (or super class: by Carnegie’s own definition) that often will forget that there are real human beings existing on this earth while they maximize each others shares holders worth; that will be affected by many of the onerous profit driven decisions when concerning food, air and water. Most weather calamities and other demises are stepping-stones to take America down from its current system of checks & balances and respectful of the people form of government. (all individuals regardless of class or origin since their birth). I will leave you with two researchers who have extensive information along with proof of the many steps that are lately accelerating taking America to a different type of system and to later attempt to merge for a one-world government which is a threat to our liberties and even health for the ends justify the means in their Utility system to include the deliberate destruction of private property which will even include no right to self-shield your own body(or personal space)from their future imposed possible vaccinations or controversial experimental medicines.
This system is a real threat to all mankind and being implemented daily via smart meters and other such future carbon exchange systems which is not a growth system but a FEUDAL one placing all income benefit potential in the hands of the few. Two very prominent American patriots that have well documented information on this subject and the incremental process that has been destroying our nation are; Editor Patrick Wood of the August Forecast Review and Bernadine Smith of the Second Amendment Committee in liberty gun rights.com There have been many warnings given by great individuals worldwide sacrificing their limited time, resources and money along with their expertise so I sure hope that some of you appreciated it and that others help out in whatever small way for no one can baby-sit voters nor do all of the work; its up to you each person to get up and do something to make your nation and local community better always looking out for the well-being of yourself, families and communities. I spent countless of hours and to include family time and now its up to you to try and help-out for I served since the year 2008 and while attending University so I must now go to focus on my other pursuits in the world of business which will still be good in that of trying to build a stronger local economy and attempting to further develop thriving American communites while keeping diplomatic ties with our neighbors worldwide. May our creator continue to bless us all and fly your flag proudly.
The Bait and Switch History of Fraud
When the People decide to embark on an extremely important journey to independence
it is wise to inquire as to whether a roadmap already exists, rather than to boldly and
unwisely venture out into the unknown and thus engage the potentially self-defeating
acts of trial and error if they’re at all avoidable. Fortunately, when we search for a
roadmap we find but only one: We discover that we’re actually “reviving” and perhaps
enlarging upon the largest undertaking of its kind in the history of Mankind that already
occurred in 1774, historically known as The Great American Republican Experiment.
There is no other known model of independent Republican Government from which to compare, before or since.
What was the Great American Republican Experiment?
The great experiment was to create a government that was truly in the hands of the
People, not the King or his Representatives, that would provide peace and harmony for
the People and for the Earth itself. More definitive is the Magnificent Supreme
Republican Statute of Rome: OF the People, BY the People, FOR the People, TO the
People, FROM the People of the Natural Family Mother, guided and governed only by
the Devine Providence over all Worldly Men!
It is important to point out that the Natural Republican State is completely defined and
contained in one single statute; and you will find the underlined referenced in the
dedication of the July 4, 1776 Unanimous Declaration of These United American
In order for all the People to fully understand the highly significant elements of this
Great American Republican Experiment, they must first be aware of the application of
the original Latin in which over one third of the text of the original Colonial
Declarations of candid Republican government were written. It is a well-known
principle of law that the exact determination of a lawful or legal document is dependent
upon a precise uniform knowledge of the law of grammar in which the document is
written at the time it was prepared by its framing Deputies; otherwise known as
“functional literacy” preservation.
To prove a very important point here, perhaps a very embarrassing one, at the turn of the
20th Century in America, a very simple qualifying literacy question was asked the
prospective Voter as follows: Sir (or Madam) how many main grammar usages make up
the entire English Vocabulary?
How many folks out there today, whom you know, could readily answer that simple, but
very important literacy question; much less even understand the question?
You can think about the correct answer while we proceed on.
To begin with, original Latin, as in many of its off-shoot languages, is male-singular or
feminine-plural gender sensitive. Therefore, in order to fully understand the law of
Statute, one must be aware of the law of Language upon application, as then applied,
and be very aware of the gender being used. For example, all “manly governments
corporate” of the World are defined by Latin male-singular-gender terms, because the
“flow” of government is only in one direction: from the Ruling Class down, via issue of
an “Enumerated Charter” for that purpose. Only one government in all history is defined
by a Latin feminine-gender-plural term, because the “flow” of government extends to
and from the People in a Natural plenary system at every temporary Deputy level. With
this in mind, one must fully digest the following definitions:
Democracy: Anglicized singular male expression from original Latin “demos +
cratios” meaning “Upon the Majority of anything, including Men (People)”. The
“flow” is singular.
Republic: Anglicized singular male expression from original Latin “res + publicus,”
meaning “For all Men (People)”. The “flow” is singular.
Republican: Anglicized plural-feminine expression from original Latin “res +
publicae” to “res + publicanus,” meaning “Of, By, For, From, and To all Men
(People)”. The “flow” is not only in the plural, but also “plenary” in nature as in the
natural Family Unit free of any corporate influences. Hence “natural checks &
balances” that circulate around the “Heart” (the Mother) to and from her husband to
her offspring! Indeed, the family Mother’s Kitchen Table is considered to be the
most powerful political desk in the World! Some learned writers on American History
and Government often refer to America as “A Mother’s Government” for this reason.
Culture: “Land-water.” Lately this has been extended to include even the “air”!
Colony: Assembly of Farm Families (natural Republican States) within a prescribed
geographical boundary (of culture). This also pertains to “Tribe.”
Citizen: City, Town, and Borough residents transient within the respective established
Colony: A City Dweller.
Republican State: The family members of every Natural Mother, to include her
husband and all of her offspring.
Confederate: A criminal federation involving two or more individuals operating over
and against the lawful and accepted mode of government
Federal: Slang term for Confederate.
What Style and Form of Government did the 1774-1812 American Colonists
The “Form” refers to the written framework of the government; “Style” refers to its
actual operation within the confines of its framework, sometimes referred to as The
Flow of the Government. An important reminder: The present 1846 Hickey & Company
version of the Constitution guarantees only a republican FORM of gov’t, but not a
republican STYLE of gov’t. as “perfected” and set into motion in 1787-1790.
There are only three principal styles and forms of public governments operating
throughout the history of the World: (1) Manly Republic: Rule by King or Queen (or a
Dictator)(“For all of the People Subjects,”) who alone is free (2) Manly Democracy:
Rule by Class (“Upon all People Subjects,”) who alone are free; (3) Republican: “Rule
Of, By, To For, From All of the People,” who are All free.
Therefore we can clearly see that there is but a “hair’s breadth distinction” between a
Manly Democracy Corporate and a Manly Republic Corporate: “Upon” versus “For.” In
both cases the “flow of government” remains in a single direction – from the top down
(as in direct current).
The idea of a Government “Republican in Form and Style” is a very serious and
diametric departure from the rest of the candid world’s democracies and republics,
because the flow of government is variable (as in alternating current), or “plenary” at
each Deputy level, each of which serves as a “check & balance” against each other
Deputy level. In this sense, what the Deputy does unto others from his temporary
official seat, he also does to himself and his posterity. The People, of course, are the
final “check” against their Deputies, at the election and by jury of peers.
However, the most important and primary “check” against the “natural known manly
corporate enemies from within” is the FORM of the original American Instrumentations
of Government, described as “Republican in Form” to perpetually defend the intended
“National Republican Style” of the government.
Present generations of Americans erroneously refer to these governmental instruments
as “Constitutions”; because that is what has been allowed to happen by a functionally
illiterate society under European Royal Family Confederate Congress University
Publishing House Company dominance over our Schools, Churches, and public medias.
The original American Colonial form and style of government is the only government in
history that is defined by a Latin feminine-gender-plural Term: Republican; obviously
because of the plural flow of government extending to and from all of the People. And
equally important to understand is that by reference to all present “State Enabling
Legislation (Acts)”, the instrument “Republican in Form” is mandatory, and to be on an
“equal footing with the original (American Republican Colonial) States in all respect
whatever.” Remember that in this case “The People” of the original United American
Colonies ARE THE STATES, individually, as well as “United” collectively via their
appointed temporary Deputies for the purposes set forth in their “non-enumerated
Declarations”, sometimes called “American Republican Freeman Letters” for want of a
better term by the European Royal Family Confederate Congress University Clergy.
The official American Government was manned by Deputies at the individual Colonial
level as well as at the new Perfected National Supreme Republican level; and was
originally described as The Supreme Law of the People, NOT of the Land (culture). All
individuals become “Deputies” when performing specific duties for the assembly of
People, because they were “Deputies” even unto themselves and their own families. The
Great American Experiment is the only assembly of people in all history (1774-1812)
that has attempted to employ a Natural (hence National) Republican Government (of,
by, from, to, for) in actual operation (in Style), and in writing (in declarative Form).
There is no other governmental operation in comparison. All other Styles of Worldly
government throughout all recorded history are defined by Latin male-singular terms:
Republic, Democracy, Anarchy, Monarchy, Oligarchy, etc, etc; all most commonly
referred to as Manly States Corporate, whereby all flow of government is in the singular
(i.e. one way only) from Ruler or the Ruling Class downward, and their Written
Documents are in “enumerated” Corporate Charter (Charta) (i.e. Latin Co-Statutere)
hence in “Constitution Form”. Unfortunately we have also just described the present
Confederate system of government that has encroached upon and has, by and large,
taken over via its transposed adopted “Constitutions” and other “enumerated code”
systems of culture control modus operendae.
Therefore there is a vast distinction between a Constitution (a list of “enumerated”
independent statutes for different purposes)” and a Statute (a non-enumerated
declaration of single purpose). Many folks understand the legislative limitations
imposed by their individual state Constitution provision prohibiting the amendment of
an existing statute, or a proposed legislative Bill for statute for another purpose by
simply referring to the original title (enacting clause). However it is important to point
out that your several individual “State” Constitutions are supposed to be in single statute
“Declarative (non-enumerated) Form” in order to be on an actual “equal footing” basis
with the original 14 Colonial Republican States. The 1889 Montana Convention
Delegates were very well aware of this important fact! This explanation will help you
understand why the original Perfected 1787 Supreme Republican Declaration of the
United American Colonies had to be transposed into “Constitution Form” by Hickey &
Company, converting the title (enacting clause) to a mere “preamble”, so that the
desired “enumerated Charter of Confederate Appendages & Index” attached to the end
would not attract immediate functionally illiterate and docile public attention. This
methodology had already worked very well for the European Royal Family and its New
York Confederate Congress University Publishing Company system immediately
following the 1812 American Colonial Archives Depository Fires; in which all of the
destroyed original Colonial Declarations of Republican Government were thus cleverly
substituted for the desired transposed “enumerated Constitution Form” versions without
requiring public vote; and by 1860 most of the American Colonies, now transformed
into “political states” since 1813, were attempting to function via their THIRD new
“enumerated Constitution” of 1787 Northwest Territorial Ordinance Model government,
on the average! Therefore it was actually very simple to slide in the new desired 1846
Hickey & Company Version of “The Constitution FOR the American People, with
Charter of Confederate Appendages & Index”, adopted by “Select” members of
Congress and the Courts by Resolution of Volume Purchase, February 1847, and
distributed to all of America via the new March 1847 Post Roads and Franking Act;
which has gone undetected by the general public. By reference to “volume purchase”
means that the 1846 Wm. Hickey & Company Version of “The Constitution” is actually
a small black hard cover BOOK in excess of 400-pages of similar transposed
Confederate Congress Library documents that were not destroyed by fire in 1812.
By reference to “Select Members” means card-carrying B.A.R. members of the New
York Confederate Congress University Legislative Council who were either elected to
official American Congressional Seats or appointed as Judges presiding over American
Courts, as was Abraham Lincoln an elected President.
You most likely will recognize that this practice continues in America at the present
time; whereby it is now mandatory that in order to hold any high government office
position, a “degree” from a leading “World University” is required by the “qualifying
individual”! However our Framers in Convention held that such “degree of University”
was a “Title of European Royal Family Nobility”!
Can these transposed Constitutions be reversed back into their original Declarative
The answer is YES; and believe it or not, this is still being done as a simple classroom
exercise in some schools throughout America; but was more common in the schools of
higher education prior to, and during the early part of the 19th Century. However this
exercise is limited only to the original transposed Constitutional Manuscripts from the
original Declarations. This exercise cannot operate upon subsequent amendments nor
upon enumerated Charters of Appendage at their inception to include any of the socalled
“new state Constitutions” adopted since 1969.
In conducting this simple but very educational classroom exercise, THE FIVE MAIN
GRAMMAR USEAGES OF THE ENGLISH VOCABULARY comes to bear of
extreme importance. If you answered the foregoing literacy question (four of the five in
any order) correctly as follows: Spelling, Word Order, Punctuation, Capitalisis, and
Signs & Symbols (to include Arabic Numeral Symbols); you are now qualified to vote
in the elections at the turn of the 20th Century. Indeed, all English Grammar Lessons are
broken down into these five main parts. Moreover, when any ONE or MORE of these
main usages is applied to our written laws, A STATUTORY AMENDMENT HAS
OCCURRED! Hence THE LAW OF GRAMMAR GOVERNS THE WRITTEN LAW
OF STATUTE. To be sure, the substitution of a capital or small Arabic Numeral
Symbol for the declarative word “That” in any statute is an AMENDMENT to that
original statute! A “Declaration (A Statute)” is thus transformed into an enumerated
“Corporate Constitution” for “other purposes” well apparent!
Therefore, the People of (name of the Assembly) who are concerned must decide
whether they wish to maintain a Manly Corporate Representative Style and Form of
Government, or erect a Supreme National Republican Style and Form of Deputy
Government. Here it is important to note that “National” and “Republican” are actually
synonymous associations while both being diametric to a mere Union or “Federation”.
This to point out that in the 1774-1812 American Colonial Republican example, where
the individual People are “The State”, a mere Union or Con-Federation of men cannot
co-exist for any given length of time. Furthermore, the American People already have
the advantage of simply resurrecting their existing original Colonial Supreme National
Republican Form and Style of Government.
If a Republican Form is desired, the true authority of its creators – all of the People –
needs to be identified in its Enacting Clause, an integral part of the statute. This is NOT
a mere preamble to a “constitution.”
The original fourteen (14) American Colonial Declaration “Enacting Clauses,”
extending more or less from the original Virginia Plan, make up the “Enacting Clause of
Purpose” which is essentially the main body of the Unanimous Declaration of 4 July
1776. The July 4, 1776 Unanimous Republican Declaration was “perfected” thirteen
years later in September, 1787 by the very same “Deputy Framers” who penned the
1776 model, and in the very same grammar form and style, known as “Republican in
Form” or in “Letter Form,” for want of a better term. These very unique American
Colonial Republican instruments defining and containing the new untried Republican
government were known as “The American Freeman Letters” for this reason.
(Enclopedia: American Printing Presses: History of)
The Enacting Clause is perfectly authoritative in its source: the People; peremptory in
its action: ordain and establish; definite and exact in its subject: this (Statute); and
distinct, broad, and extensive in its purpose and ends: embracing the defense of liberty,
safety, and welfare of the National (natural) Independent Republican States (every
Natural Mother) of America as its primary objective by its established Deputies.
We have here (1) the Authority: We, the People of these United Colonies; (2) the ends
for which the More Perfect 1787 Supreme National Republican Statute is made, in Six
Particulars of Supreme Importance known to every natural Mother on Earth; (3) the
explicit ordaining of this Statute, including this introductory clause; (4) the Nation of
Republican States for whom it is made: the People of These United Colonies of
America. The only distinction between this Perfected 1787 Colonial Republican Statute
and the individual fourteen Colonial Statutes in place from 1774 to 1787 is the coined
word Nation (National). This, in part, explains why no further oath was required at the
new Perfected National Seat of Government, since the “Deputies” thereof held their
respective National Seats under the same oath(s) as their respective individual fourteen
Colonial Statute counter parts at each respective Colonial Seat of their residence. In
other words in this Natural (National) Republican plenary system, the oath of the seat
and oath of fidelity pertained to every Colonial Deputy regardless of his temporary
appointment level. And the individual Colonial Statute, and the new Supreme National
Republican Statute, placed limitations of action only upon the Seat of the temporary
Deputies identified therein.
In this respect, (1) The Authority, THE PEOPLE, as (4) THE NATION, do not need to
have a “Bill of Rights” involving themselves; because what is not specifically limited to
their temporary Deputy Seats in the non-enumerated Statute is automatically reserved to
themselves, as in the case of any other “King or Queen” of history.
The 1787 Perfected Supreme National Republican Declaration was in the very same
format and graphics style as is the 1776 Unanimous Declaration of the American
Republican States (all of the American Families), which is required of all New
Republican States desirous of National status recognition in order to retain consistency
in Form with regard to the “equal footing doctrine” of the United Colonies. Hence the
term: “Republican in Form.” Again, this has nothing whatsoever to do with a
“Republican Fraternal Political Party Organization of University.” It is, in fact, an
official non-partisan operation of Government, distinctive and unique in its Form
(framework) and distinctly authoritive and unique in its Natural Style (mode of
operation) of checks and balances at every level.
To further clarify the foregoing, the 1774-1812 Great American Experiment was not a
“representative” style of government under any kind of pretext. This is the dramatic, and
most misunderstood distinction between the 1774-1790 Continental Congress versus its
natural enemy from within—“The Legislative Council of the Confederate Congress of
New York and its notorious University Publishing House Company Representatives”.
Obviously a “Deputy Seat” is not an individual or collective “Representative” (implied
power of attorney). Indeed, the original Colonies were possessed of a Senate (Land
Owner Minority) and “House of Deputies” (Colonial Citizens Public Majority)
extending from the original Virginia Plan; which was also applied by the Continental
Congress framers as the basis for their perfected Supreme National Republican Plan that
emerged from the September 1787 Philadelphia Convention and adopted by Colonial
Conventions for that purpose in 1789.
Some so-called “Constitutional” historians, committing a folly against themselves,
argue that the European Royal Family’s Confederate Congress University’s Articles of
1777, designed and intended to regain cultural control over all of the Colonies, did not
grant the Deputies in the 1787 Philadelphia Convention the authority to frame and adopt
the new plan of Supreme National Republican government. This is true from the
standpoint that the 1777 Articles of Confederation is actually a “foreign and/or criminal
Form and Style government”, in flagrant violation of the recent July 4, 1776 Unanimous
Declaration, designed and intended to operate over and against the official Republican
State governments of the several Colonies already in place in attempt to confuse and/or
destroy the idea of a Natural Republican government from the minds of the people of
the Colonies, and especially to the rest of the Candid World lest it would destroy all of
the other “Manly Forms and Styles” of government the World over, thereby displacing
all of the Kings, Queens and other “Nobles”! Moreover the 1777 Confederate Charter,
extending from the original Latin, admits by its title that it is a “criminal” Charter to the
lawful Republican establishment then in place.
Therefore, for easy clarification, the so-called 1777 Articles of Confederation, by that
date, had no more authority over and among the American Colonies than did the
Charters of another other foreign country under Royal Family dominance; and which the
Republican States of America made explicitly clear in their 1776 Unanimous
Declaration by the application to two terms: “absolved and dissolved” from any and all
political connections whatever! This then would necessarily include the subsequent
foreign 1777 Articles of Confederation issued by the European Royal Family
Confederate Congress of New York as well.
What is essentially pointed out here is that for all American Lawful Purposes, the
original individual fourteen (14) American Republican Declarations of Republican
government are still in force and effect by fact of the official July 4, 1776 Unanimous
Declaration that the majority of Americans celebrate every Fourth of July. This holds
for the individual original “equal footing Colonial governments” (called “states”) as
well. Therefore, where the original American Declarations of Republican government
remains in the minds of the majority of the natural American Republican State(s), THE
INDIVIDUAL AND COLLECTIVE PEOPLE, fully supported by the fact of this one
remaining original instrument “Republican in Form”, the important American
Framework of, for and by the American People, merely set aside and gathering dust on
the shelves, can be readily resurrected and restored in a very short period of time, IF
THE MAJORITY OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SHOULD SO DESIRE!
Will such a feat be easy? Obviously NO. The criminal Confederate University
Publishing House Company system, driven underground during the Civil War with
prices on their heads, even by the military, as being the primary cause of that deadly war
in the first place, is now very well-entrenched and are manning our lawful governmental
seats at every level, to include our courts. This is compounded by the fact of a 98%
public functional illiteracy problem and University programming of 45-year olds on
down. The good news is that wide spread public exposure remains their primary and
natural enemy, and the internet is serving that purpose very well.
To best describe this remarkable American Colonial Republican system, it was (and still
is to some extent in the minds of the American People as above-mentioned) a Plenary
System of Revolving Temporary Deputy SEATS at every level: Township, Parish
(County), Colonial (State), and Supreme National (originally diametrically opposite of
federal); and in each level, the flow (style) of the government is in the Plural; and the
whole system was completely defined and contained within one single non-enumerated
Statute (a Declaration Letter) in Form, following its “Enacting Clause” of Authority
(We, the People) and Purpose (limitations of action imposed only upon the temporary
Deputy Seat). In other words, the “Limitation of Action” was imposed upon the “Seats”
of all of the Colonial Deputies uniformly, regardless of their station, as set forth in that
one single non-enumerated Statute. The Colonial Oath(s) pertained to all Deputy levels
extending from their respective Colony of Residence, to include the perfected Supreme
National Republican level established September 1787. In all actuality, the perfected
Supreme Republican system of 1787 served as an extension of each individual Colony
while establishing and maintaining an enforceable uniformity of checks and balances
between all of the Colonies already in existence; because the National Senate Seat
Deputy was appointed by the individual Colonial legislative Deputy assemblies.
The single July 4, 1776 Statute, the non-enumerated Unanimous Declaration of these
United Colonies of America, a compilation of all of the individual Colonial Declaration
Enacting Clauses then in place extending from the originating 1774 Virginia Plan, in no
manner, shape, or form, implied or established any kind of alleged Representative
(unlimited Power of Attorney) Government, contrary to the adverse 1777 Articles of
Confederation, and the July 1787 Northwest Territorial Ordinance (Compact of the
Confederate Congress of New York calling only itself and its “representatives”
individually and collectively “The United States”) or the later transposed 1846
Confederate Congress’ Hickey Version of “The Constitution FOR the American
People” elaborated upon below.
Therefore it must be clearly understood that only the Confederate Congress and its
private University Publishing House Company system has referred to itself, individually
and collectively—“The United States” from 1777 to the present time; and is now more
commonly known as “The United Nations” at the same address. In the 1787
Philadelphia emergency Convention of the Colonial Continental Congress (May-
September), the criminal Congress of New York and its private University was the
reason for the emergency; and was described by the Convention Deputies as “The
The Republican State is a direct reference to the Family Members of the Natural
Mother; hence, the true Independent State of America, and which includes the Mothers
of the Republican States of (name of country or colony) of all other parts of the World,
candid nor non-candid Peoples. For this reason, all 1774-1812 American instruments of
government were also Republican in Style (operation) as set forth in the Republican
Form (written framework). The Form was a Single Statute (a Declaration) – explaining
why the Colonial Framers never referred to their written frameworks as Constitutions
(Latin: co-statutere), i.e. in “corporate charter form.” The July 4, 1776 Declaration, for
example, is in single Statute (letter) form, and therefore does not require a “committee
of arrangement”. The original fourteen Colonial Declarations of government and their
Unanimous 1776 Declaration, and as Perfected thirteen years hence were often referred
to by the Royal Family clergy as the Freeman Letters or Letters of American Republican
Government, for want of a better description! Indeed, the 1774-1789 American
Continental Congress was possessed of only a “Committee on Style.” A Declaration
(one single non-enumerated Statute) does not need to be arranged. This is what is truly
unique about the 1774-1812 American Colonial System of Republican Government; in
that not one of their primary instruments even remotely resembled the typical European
Royal Family River Basin Enumerated Corporate Charter instruments. A most unique
“check” all by itself; while establishing that any incorporation between two or more
men was considered to be a felony against the natural (National) Republican States!
The majority of the people, especially new immigrants from manly corporate countries,
have a misunderstanding of the manly Democratic-Republic state (corporate) versus the
natural Republican State (non-corporate). Remember, Republic is male singular;
Republican is feminine plural. This misunderstanding is normal because of the
European Royal Family University programming that has been instilled in the minds of
the Worldly Posterity gradually since the American Colonial Archives Depository fires
of 1812 to the present time, thus serving to create a blind trust (discussed in more detail
below). Some folks might relate to the Confederate Congress and its private University
Company as “The Devil’s Creature”.
Neither a manly republic corporate nor a manly democracy corporate can operate within
the intended feminine natural (National) non-corporate Republican system that is wholly
defined and contained within a single statute for that purpose. One single statute,
following its Enacting Clause of singular purpose, does not need any Arabic Numeral
Symbols between its clauses because it does not need to be “arranged” or “codified” in
any order; and this very unique design serves as a natural “check” against outside and
internal corrupt Corporate University political influences that rely upon “enumerated
Charters and “Codes” for their desired “culture-control” agenda or modus operendae of
design and purpose (i.e. “Supreme Law of the LAND” 1846)! In this respect, all
“Lawyers” and “Lawyer Judges”, are best identified as “Natural Corporate Creatures of
University”; while our Framers in Convention considered anyone possessed of a
“Degree of University” to be therefore possessed of “A Degree of European Royal
Family NOBILITY”; hence the reason for the “Nobility Clause” in the original Supreme
National Republican Declaration of the United American Colonies, further clarifying
the “absolved & dissolved” clause of their original July 4, 1776 Unanimous
What Style and Form of government did the King want for the Colonies?
Unfortunately, the European Royal Family’s Confederate Congress and its University
Publishing House Company system has reversed the intended American Colonial
government, both in Style and in Form, by cleverly transposing (altering the grammar)
of all original American documents and private writings, gradually upon all subsequent
Republican State generations from 1812 to the present, for the purpose of regaining
complete CULTURE control over all of the North American Continent. “Confederate”
is an original Latin reference meaning a “criminal private federation of several men”
(synonym to Oligarchy) in opposition to the intended “Lawful Republican (we, the
People) Authority.” “Con” is old Latin for “criminal”, as in “CON-MAN” for example.
ALL of the original American Colonial Instruments of candid Colonial American
Republican government from 1774 to 1812 were completely destroyed in the Arlington
and Richmond depository fires, excepting only the Unanimous Declaration of the
United Colonies of America July 4, 1776, and The Records of the Colonial Debates of
the 1787 Convention of the American Continental Republican Congress of Philadelphia,
which had been placed into the custody of Mr. Jonathan Elliot for printing and
publication. The careful reading of the original Records of The Debates, from the
original Plates, by Elliot can put a great deal of this discussion into proper perspective,
supported further by the original 1911 publication of Professor Max Farrand, of Yale
University, RECORDS OF THE FEDERAL CONVENTION, in three volumes, who
obviously experienced a rather rude wake-up call himself, discovering the very
extensive altering of documents prior to admission into the refurbished Library of
Congress since 1816. The works of Farrand is mislabeled as well, because it actually
involved the DEBATES OF THE UNITED COLONIES, therefore the proper label
should be “NATIONAL CONVENTION”!
It is essential to understand that during this same period, from 1774 through 1812, there
was only one organization operating on American soil that called itself “The United
States”; and that was, and still is, the Confederate Congress of New York and its Select
European Royal Family University “Representative Membership, i.e. “One House
Legislative Counsel.” The term “con-federate” in its original Latin reference describes a
criminal federation operating against the lawfully established style & form of public
government; the slang term of which is Federal.
For the purpose of gaining a better understanding of the Law of Statute we will use the
Perfected September, 1787 American Colonial Supreme National Republican State
Declaration of Government (erroneously referred to by subsequent generations as a
Constitution) for an example:
The first sentence of the Constitution is often called a Preamble. But that term was not
applied to it by those who framed the instrument, and is not found in the original
manuscript. It is not a preamble in form or substance, but is the Enacting Clause – an
integral part of the statute itself. A preamble gives reasons why a resolution should be
adopted or an enactment made, but is not a part of the resolution or enactment. The
enacting clause, to the contrary, is mandatory. No other part of a statute is more
important – such as is the introductory sentence of the 1787 Supreme National
Republican Declaration (the Constitution): “We, the People of________, for certain
Purposes, do ordain and establish this (Statute) for the (United Republican States) of
America (for the ends as follows); That, That, That, etc.” Again, in this official one-ofa-
kind case example, the “States” are in fact each individual family unit collectively
within each respective “Parish,” “Colony” AND all of the Colonies collectively; and
NOT in reference to the Deputy Seat(s) of the government as is now the case due to the
cleverly-transposed American instruments that gradually occurred between 1812 and
In this perspective, by application of a simple school classroom pencil, paper and eraser
exercise, the Constitutional Preamble reverts back to the original Enacting Clause, and
all Arabic Numeral Symbols are deleted wherever they appear in the text and are
replaced by the declarative word “That”. After you have completed this simple
classroom exercise upon the present American transposed “1846 Hickey Constitution
version”, you will be among the growing number of people who know what the original
perfected American Colonial Declaration of Republican Government looked like when
it emerged from that historic 1787 Philadelphia Continental Congress Convention. Of
course, some words and punctuation were also transposed by the Confederate Congress
and its private University Publishing House Company, most of which are quite obvious
once you properly apply “The Law of English/Latin Grammar” as then uniformly used
Bill of Rights
Needless to point out in this case, whatever actions a Deputy takes he also takes against
himself, or herself, and against his or her posterity. In this sense, the question arose in
the 1787 Philadelphia Convention as follows: What King or Queen, throughout all of
history, ever ordered or consented to a “list of rights against themselves” after he or she
had just declared himself or herself King and/or Queen over their own Culture (land &
water)? In other words, their family farm and their family home! The debate on this
issue in Convention lasted only a few minutes; because only the National Deputy was
limited of action by the new Republican Plan. Do you personally know of any such
King or Queen?
It is strongly suggested that you are not standing in front of a mirror when you ask
yourself this question; lest you might spot such a King or Queen. One must fully
understand that the only time in history when a People required a “bill of rights” in
defense of their private God-given liberties was when someone other than the People
themselves, individually and collectively was the King and/or Queen or the Royal
Family/Dictatorship ruling class issuing River Basin Culture Control Enumerate
Charters limiting the actions of their subjects.
“During the 1787 Philadelphia Convention as it was preparing to adjourn sine die, a
member who had been absent rose with the need for a bill of rights to be appended. The
silence in the chambers was instantly deafening with all eyes fastened on the Deputy
with the motion. The chair finally broke the silence with a question to the now
bewildered gentleman: ‘Does the learned gentleman know of any instance in history
whereby any king or queen ordered a list of rights against themselves after they had just
declared themselves King and Queen over their very own Culture?’ The now very red
faced gentleman’s knees seem to buckle as he slumped back into his chair as he
withdrew his motion on the way down! As soon as the assembly adjourned sine die, the
embarrassed gentleman rapidly made his exit leaving his papers scattered on the table.
Several curious deputies went over and examined his abandoned papers to discover that
the gentleman had obviously committed the folly against himself by taking his notes in
the enumerated corporate charter form familiar to his profession as a lawyer!” (Records
of the Convention, Max Farrand, Yale University, 1911)(Private Writings, of Jefferson,
Madison, Washington, and Story)
The term “human” is original Latin for “manslayer,” or “destroyer of People or a
Society” as in the case of “Hu a tree”; and is officially-applied by the American
Framing Deputies in their Unanimous Declaration listing the dastardly Events imposed
upon the Families of the Natural American Mothers and the reason(s) for their
Separation, in addition to the Mothers of All Mankind by those World Rulers of
“Human Tendency”, specifically by King George III at that point in time. Thus the
relation to “Human Events” in this case pertains entirely to the control of the Natural
Republican State of the World by “the controlling of All Worldly Culture (land &
water) by a very small class of people.” The Unanimous Declaration is the only known
“official” document that uses this term. This goes hand in hand with whomever controls
the Worldly Public Education and therefore the Currency. We should all feel extremely
embarrassed to have allowed ourselves to be led into this flagrant assault against our
Natural Mothers, at our expense via the disguise of public education at the public
expense (property tax) and should use the word “Human” very judiciously in our
vocabulary to self-describe ourselves and our own actions of neglect and ignorance.
In every human (manly corporate) example, the flow (Style) of the government is
obviously in the singular: from the Minority Ruling Family, Class, etc. authority down
to, or upon the Majority of the Natural Family (i.e the Republican State). It occurs in
every possible aspect, commencing with the control over all public education, then
control of the currency, to finally complete ownership and control of All Worldly
Culture (land & water) and all life activity there upon. Hence the European Royal
Family University’s (Confederate Congress of New York) goal to control all World
geography, naturally would thereby assume complete control of all Life Activity thereupon
which is clearly set forth of purpose in its privately-owned 1777 Articles of
Confederation, the 1787 Northwest Territorial Ordinance (Compact), the Constitution
For the American People, 1846 by Hickey, and United States Code Statutes at Large
Publication (USC), 1926 to present. It is therefore only these particular Human
University Regency Order (sometimes referred to as “Devil Worshipers”) select
members who have been, and still are today, calling only themselves, individually and
collectively “The United States” by direct reference.
Call it “The Parade of the Humans” for want of a better term to describe only the
History of the Rulers of the World and only their related events imposed upon the
Natural Republican States (All of the People), as we study the Covenants of the Arks.
Governments do not make history – only people make history.
Remember the History of “Modern” World Warfare – it’s primary purpose is to destroy a
Mind Set within a particular Class of Republican People (a Colony) to the advantage of
the Human Class Mind Set. Time has well proven that the lives of the Republican State
of the World, as well as America, has little or no value to the Human Class at any given
There are but only two WORLD classes – the majority Natural Republican Class
(Families of all People) within each of their respective Geographical Boundaries, versus
the minority Royal University Human Class desiring to Control All World Geography
(Culture); and therefore All Life Activity there-upon. Prior to the introduction of the
July 4, 1776 Unanimous Declaration to the rest of “the Candid World” by the founders
of the untried 1774 Great American Republican Experiment, only The European Royal
University Human Class existed in its various “manly styles” of Corporate government,
also Corporate in Form; and which, unfortunately, is what now prevails in America.
We are not dealing with, nor establishing communities, but in fact with assemblies of
People in which their Seats of Government in no manner resemble the typical and more
familiar “manly corporate Representative (power of attorney) state” vested in entirely in
a King, Ruler, Monarchy, Anarchy, Leader, or such other singular synonymous terms
grouped under the title of Human Events to which the term “Federal” can apply.
So, essentially what we are actually engaging is the Revival, and Enlarging of the
greatest undertaking in the history of all Mankind, to make it fit the demands of Natural
Republican States in this new century of nearly complete University Human Geographic
Control of all Worldly Culture, and thus all forms of life activity thereupon.
How was the initial new American Republican experiment derailed in America?
The framework of all candid Colonial American Republican Government was in
Declarative Format until 1813, following the American Colonial Archives Depository
Fires at Richmond and Arlington in 1812. All original American Colonial Instruments,
to include the “perfected Supreme National Republican Declaration of September 1787
and related Convention papers, described as being “Republican in Form”; or sometimes
referred to as “the American Republican Freeman Letters”, were completely lost when
these Depositories were burned to the ground during the so-called “War of 1812”. The
Confederate Congress of New York Archives Depository remained intact with only
some “select original Colonial document contents” taken out in the streets and burned
with some furniture. Coincidently, little other additional damage was inflicted during
this very short incursion.
The year 1812 was when the European Royal Family sacked Washington, D.C. and the
American Colonial Archives Depositories in Arlington and Richmond were burned to
the ground from within by Confederate operatives posing as librarians. This is in
reference to the librarians who were actually Confederate Congress University
operatives (equivalent to Rhodes Scholars today) posing as trustworthy American
Librarians. Only some of the New York Confederate Congress Library contents were
taken out in the street and burned with some furniture by its librarians; thus leaving only
the desired “transposed versions of the official American Colonial documents.”
After the “burning” the University Press, Crown Press, and several other related private
Confederate Congress Code Publishing Houses printed hundreds of different versions of
the destroyed documents and scattered them throughout the land. With the help of
Carnegie libraries, select members of the Congress and the Courts, the Sir William
Hickey, Esq.1846 version of “The Constitution” was chosen as the “Standard Version”
adopted by resolution of volume purchase by the select membership in the U.S.
Congress and the Courts in February 1847. The U.S. Congress then ordered it “Franked
(mailed at the government expense)” to the public by the new March 1847 Post Roads
and Postal Franking Act. This officially established the date in which the so-called
Twelve Articles (Charter) of Federal Amendment (commonly known as the Bill of
Rights) were first officially published in America. And this is how they were actually
From 1813 forward, the Confederate Congress and its University Publishing House
Company system virtually took over the government from within by replacing all of the
original American non-enumerated Declarations with cleverly transposed “enumerated
Constitutions” in typical Royal Family River Basin Corporate (Magna Charta) Charter
style, by simply transposing (substituting) the word “That” wherever it appeared in the
text with a capital Arabic numeral symbol, substituting semi-colons with ordinary
commas, changing words and word order. In some cases, involving the original
individual Colonial Declarations, a capital Arabic Numeral Symbol was added before
the declarative word “That”. Later versions included the addition of small Arabic
numeral symbols within the “Capital Enumerated Articles” of the Constitution(s). After
the 1812 Archives Depository fires, all such American official assemblies under
Federal, i.e., Confederate Congress control and authority via the bastardized (Revised)
American documents, were possessed of “A Committee of Style… and Arrangement.”
The clear objective was to remove the potential widespread global threat of candid
Republican government from the minds of the People, while directing the operation of
the government back to the desired European Royal Family’s control over all Worldly
Therefore, from 1813 forward, the original fourteen American Colonies no longer had a
“Senate and House of Deputies,” but instead consisted of a “Senate and House of
Representatives,” simply by reason of clever Private University Publishing House
Company substituting the original American Republican Instruments with the
transposed “Constitution Versions” to eliminate the need for a public vote. Interestingly,
the records show that by 1859 the original remaining 13-American Colonies were
attempting to function via their THIRD NEW CONSTITUTION VERSION (The 2nd
and 3rd Versions by Public Vote) on the average; while the 14th Colony (Providence
Plantations & Western Territory) simply vanished from record, and is now known as
“Canada”, to even include the Northern part of the Louisiana Purchase!
“Representative” simply means implied unlimited or limited power of attorney. By 1816
all original “Fourteen American Republican Colonies” had been cleverly transformed
into “Corporate Democratic Republics” by the Confederate Congress of New York and
its notorious private University Publish House Companies; and the 14th Colony,
Providence Plantations, extending from Rhode Island to the Northern tip of Nova Scotia
and Territories West, had been cleverly ceded from the United American Colonies by
the Confederate Congress of New York and its private University Publishing House
Company’s manipulation of the original American Colonial records.
This points out that from 1813 forward, the University transpositions remained
continuous and uniform to coincide with United States Statutes at Large (i.e. formerly
known as Lawyers Guides of Great Britain…for the American Colonies). The
connection here is “When in the course of Human Events, it becomes necessary for one
people…, etc, etc.” (July 4, 1776). This Unanimous Declaration made it clear to the rest
of the Candid World (this one People), that henceforth all connection (all ties whatever)
is absolved and dissolved from the European Royal Family and its University clergy
(lawyers and professors of Degree), and its diverse Culture Control agenda. That would
include those lawyers’ Guides too, wouldn’t it?
The foregoing research references disclose that our undertaking to restore National
Republican government is certainly much greater now in this century than what
confronted those American Framers between 1774 and 1812, primarily because of the
massive increase of the World’s Republican (Family) population compounded by the
University’s near-complete control of all World Media and Public Education at the
public expense from 1910 forward to the present time, compounded even further by the
University-induced functional illiteracy problem involving 98% of the present
population. Other than these features, the only thing that has changed is technology, and
the speed of communications.
At this point, we must necessarily switch our focus to another very important Natural
Law known as Law of Language (grammar) in order to establish the desired
“Uniformity of Understanding (The element of Functional Literacy) among the Natural
Republican State of the World,” which is the most important single element dealing
with any public issue, to include the National Defense of, by and for our Republican
States from without as well as from within, and the winning of any war without as well
Law of Language
Interestingly, the Law of Language was formerly the sole property, so to speak, of only
The Candid English/Latin Speaking World at the time of the 1776 Unanimous
Declaration. Since the turn of the 19th Century, the Law of Language has extended,
more or less, to include a major segment of The Non-Candid Indigenous World
adopting the English/Latin language due to the development of global communications
and commerce. And this is a good thing. However, the Natural Republican State of the
World exists and extends to both the Candid (white) World and the Non-Candid (nonwhite)
Indigenous World equally, regardless of the mode of communications between
individuals thereof, especially for the subject purpose of this writing. Essentially no
man, woman or child is exempt from the importance of this Republican State reference
subject, free of corporate influences.
The European Royal Family Rule has been in fact, up to this time, Rule by Class via an
illusion of “Collective Sovereignty.” It’s been an illusion because the People have been
barred from assembling as a whole due to the lack of knowledge and technologies, and
their elected “representatives” have, by default of the People, taken on the role of
“Collective Representative Sovereignty for the Common Good”, and have even become
so bold as to allege that they are “qualified public leaders”! The University Company
has cleverly substituted “equality” in lieu of the actual state of being “equal.” But now
the People have the necessary technology – the Internet – to assemble for the first time in
history, and, in fact, as “Equals,” but the real key at all times is “Uniformity of
Understanding what is written, read, and said.” During the American Revolutionary
period, the concerned European Royal Family University Clergy applied the reference:
“The candid American Farmers are all as Lawyers”! Perhaps that is again taking shape
in America, as well as in other parts of the World, thanks to the Internet.
The good news is that even though it has taken more than 230-years for the European
Royal Family Confederate Congress University Company Culture Control (Land &
Water, to now include Air) modus operendae to mature to the point it presently has;
widespread public exposure of its criminal activity from within remains its greatest
natural enemy as history has very well proved, with its operatives being driven
underground three times in American history. Perhaps the Fourth time will be more
August 10, 2011
To me it was never about a party or a special interest group but about our country; for if we cannot save ourselves and our prosperity how is it that we could save someone else? Also, religion should not be used as the main platform for there are many conservatives that vote Republican who belong to different religions or worldviews and yes some people may also be conservative but gay and that is their right. I always wondered at the begining of most campaigns why people were being rude to newcomers and even portraying an excluding type of attitude. I was attending University and often with my books on my arms but attending public events and invitations to gatherings but later find that many of these stemmed from some religious type of group which perplexed me for I could never imagine religion per se to be an issue but for globalists this has posed a useful tool for now religion and in my opinion extreme religious viewpoints have been coming to dominate parts of elections by some groups. If we cannot save America, how is it that we could save our freedom or religion? Also, I do not believe that anyone should use their power from religious organizations to even think of excluding any curious new comer to conservative principles or the Republican Party in general. Many wedge issues such as gender orientation, social views, religious preference, choice of giving priority to own districts or if someone goes to church or not should not be used as platform but to teach by example and education. This is why I no longer will keep an affilitation with any political party but will vote for Ron Paul for he is the only one with a sound voting record and the last hope in saving this nation without a global expansion agenda as others who promote ties with NATO and other pro-war types of organizations. Obama is no different since has taken America to unConstitutional wars and expansionism taking us further to globalization and world government.
Barry Goldwater-The media is very silent about the fact that Barry Goldwater was himself Jewish but often not mentioned so an excuse could be given that anyone who dares to criticize the pro-war, pro-entaglement or pro-one sided stance could be labeled anti-semite or Anti-something? Regardless of strange events or outcomes like 911, Oklahoma city bombing, Gulf of Tonkin, Afganistan, Pakistan, Lybia, Egypt etc etc etc., we are supposed to support any status quo and not our own beliefs or independent opinion. I thought I could be a precicnt leader of our nation not that of AIPAC, NATO, Rand Corporations etc.
Anyway, here is a University paper I did on Barry Goldwater:
Barry Goldwater (R-Arizona), served in the United States senate for more than thirty years and was influenced by two worldviews; that of Christianity as an Episcopalian and by Jewish cultural influences as the son of a prominent Jew. These two worldviews are at the pivot of American politics today with many Christians often taking onerous views on religion which Barry Goldwater warned us about since these stances could become a divisive element taking our representative system of government apart. The behaviors of the worldview are often not being practiced and instead replaced with confusion, fear and talks of more wars while America fails to humanists. I have greater understanding of voting struggles today thanks to the great work by Goldwater.
People around the world come from different backgrounds, cultures, levels of education and individual worldviews that often shape their actions and behaviors. This is an important concept and one of concern since many do not fully understand or follow their worldview principles. According to a research conducted by Barna in 2003, “Ninety-one percent of all born again adults and 98% of all born again teenagers do not have a biblical worldview.” (Other: Lecture Seven). It is not just ok to say Christians feel spiritual but to actually follow the Christian worldview in actions; especially since the new birth in Christ means a lot more than a label. (John 3). To truly experience new birth with Christ one has to become like our spiritual father and reveal the God of the Universe in the way we think, feel and live. (Cosgroves, 2006). Today in the name of the humanist social justice movement and via other onerous religious organizations worldviews, America is losing its liberties, economic stability and Christian foundation. This is not just affecting our educational system but also our world of politics. This is one of the many reasons that I admire greatly Barry Goldwater (R-Arizona) who had served in the senate for more than 30 thirty years and who warned us about allowing religious divisive issues to be followed blindly or dominate politics. He has been a great role model to me for it is palpable the consequences that we are suffering due to ignoring many of his warnings and a volatile topic across political voting district precincts.
Barry Goldwater was influenced by Christianity and Jewish cultural worldviews. He learned a lot about hard work ethics, taking care of family needs and business while serving as President of his inherited Jewish father’s department store, Goldwater Inc. (Goldwater Barry, In Culture wars). He also had a strong military background while serving first as a U.S. Army Air Corps pilot (1941-1945) and later retired from the Air force reserves with the rank of major general. Barry was a very unusual character and reflective of what America stands for since it is a Nation of people from diverse cultures that although many hold dear their heritage; feel and are today American. Many bring their unique worldviews but embrace the liberties in religion and the good Christian foundation that have made America great. For example, Goldwater’s father was an immigrant Jew that came from the way of Poland and Russia. During these times many Jews were scattered over that region and knew firsthand what it was like to live in a country that offers neither liberties nor self-determination which consequently Jews overcame the many obstacles and later migrated to the United States t start a new life. (Shankman, 1975). Once here many worked hard, brought up their children with appreciation for education, passion for business and optimistic outlook for self-preservation so as not to fall again in harm’s way. This is perhaps what may have influenced Barry’s Goldwater guard for religious liberties and limited government intervention into citizens’ lives. Equally admirable was his moderate views on women’s right to choose what to do with their bodies without having extreme religious factions deciding for them. In ultra- orthodox Jewish Hasidic laws women are expected to just work in the house and not even seek education which some enjoy but others who are perhaps born with higher intellectual needs may often be denied any self-expression. (Davidman & Greil, 2007) This is not to criticize but to point out that Barry Goldwater often viewed black and white issues or extreme worldviews as a threat to growth and personal liberties. In America today many Jewish women and Jews in general find some relief from oppression and still are able to live in their special communities without prejudices since America has freedom of religion. Barry Goldwater stated publicly, “ “By maintaining the separation of church and state,” he explained, “the United States has avoided the intolerance which has so divided the rest of the world with religious wars . . . Can any of us refute the wisdom of Madison and the other framers? Can anyone look at the carnage in Iran, the bloodshed in Northern Ireland, or the bombs bursting in Lebanon and yet question the dangers of injecting religious issues into the affairs of state?” (Oxfordjournal.org, 1998). He has been a good role model for becoming better informed on this issue; especially since today many precinct leaders and others running for public office are often out casted or made miserable is they do not endorse war or other such segmented onerous religious stances. Many congressmen today are even asked to sign pledges of support to certain foreign groups while often having to neglect their own districts. Are they the representatives of the U.S. tax payers or those of foreign governments or entities which often profit while America perishes? Yearly America loses its liberties due to endless wars that have religious stances and these events are leading us down to the slippery slope of perhaps losing all freedom of religion down the road. The United Nations and their humanism religion will be offered as the solutions while all the while allowed to happen in order to harness America’s wealth and freedoms. Another answer offered may be a central one-world government not too different from the one described by the author Cosgroves when mentioning the book the Brave New World.
In conclusion, Barry Goldwater used his personal experiences or worldviews to work for the liberty of individuals and in followed in actions God’s work for he wished for our nation to be careful so as not to fall into religious divisions, onerous stances against choice and future chaos. He had courage to pursue his own set of beliefs often challenging orthodoxies and demonstrated this when choosing to be an Episcopalian, a form of religion that is mostly formed by individuals coming from other worldviews. A study conducted for that religion concluded, “Most of our respondents narrated their religious transformation as a process of biographical disruption”. ((Hall, Koenig, Meador, 2010). I fully understand Goldwater since could personally relate to the fact that we most often need to question status quo and follow our inner worldviews; the ones that are truly leading us to a life in Gods character and humility not in perpetual wars, loss of liberties and neglecting to call out when great injustice or bondage may be placed in stealth upon the masses. My background is just as diverse with many influences of German, Spanish and American experiences but choosing to truly live a Christian worldview that follows God in character not in servitude to humanists or war propagandists.
Anyway, this was posted for elections will be volatile and Ron Paul supporters will need to be patient for many do not accept the fact that he has won most polls. Everytime Ron Paul comes ahead in the polls I note a lot of disregard in behavior for those that support his limited intervention and pro-American economy views. So, please be careful. I will finish my role as precicnt leader until new elections 2012 so please volunteer. I wish to thank my family for their support in the time I took for serving as a precinct leader. God bless and protect us.
Global elites in their own words…below
Cosgrove, M. P. (2006). Foundations of Christian thought: Faith, learning, and
the Christian worldview. Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel
Davidman, L., & Greil, A. L. (2007). Characters in search of a script: the exit narratives of
formerly ultra-Orthodox Jews. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion,
46(2), 201-216. Retrieved from EBSCOhost
Goldwater, Barry. (2010). In Culture Wars: An Encyclopedia of Issues, Viewpoints,
, and Voices. Retrieved from http://library.gcu.edu:2048/form?qurl=http
Hall, D. E., Koenig, H., & Meador, K. G. (2010). Episcopal measure of faith tradition: a context-
specific approach to measuring religiousness. Journal of Religion specific approach to
measuring religiousness. Journal of Religion and Health, 49(2), 164-178
Retrieved from EBSCOhost.
Oxfordjournal.org, 1998. Church & State. Retrieved from
Shankman, A. (1975). Brothers Across the Sea: Afro–Americans on the Persecution of Russian
Jews, 1881–1917. Jewish Social Studies, 37(2), 114-121. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.
Photo Image from product bought from Young Republicans at beginning of a meeting and not an endorsement of this personal Precinct 391 blog. It says, Old Fashioned GOP Soda,
Same damn ingredients since the 80’s
Now with 11.4 % more conservative Tears.
August 6, 2011
Time is near for the closing of this blog. Many other individuals all across the United States have worked very hard over the years to try to educate working Americans as to the dangers to losing our liberties and States independence to bureaucrats. America must have the hunger to remain free and feel the desire for it deep down in their belly for if not then our nation then dies plain and simply. If Americans truly wish to keep their liberties then they must fight for them and with all their might while working daily to make their lives and economy stronger and better while running despots out of office. The clock is ticking and many of the changes occurring will be irreversible and trust that from this day on forward many more unexplainable events will come to light until our beautiful America may be no more unless the people stand-up to the injustice. This has all been in the works for years and no coincidence that according to Professor and book author Anthony Sutton financial elite have always funded all sides in all wars to include communism which today they have made come full circle as the so called new economy and profited handsomely but now move to expand their power worldwide and a threat of course to all people across the world for a one world centralized army may be more tyrannical than the threat posed by any indepedent nation in comparison. There will always be those at the top running the show and may not always have the worlds best interest in mind; especially when controlling basic necessities such as land for shelter, food, air and water. Under our existing yet falling Constitutional Republic elected officials had to represent the will of the people but with each passing day they do not for if we are not in charge of our own money then obviuosly then we could never in reality be in charge of our nation. All of our elected officials are serving below those that hold our financial system and then why can they not coin their own money interest free as our Constitution more clearly stated? So, should we just start over by way of 1776 or continue down the slippery slope of total slavery to self-declared masters, America you must decide now for time is running out. If our country gets taken back by a miracle from heaven then of course we must not trust the new infiltrators that will once again attempt to fool everyone just like they did during our first attempt at independence.
(Csper.org, Financial System).
June 27, 2011
Uncategorized false propaganda, feudalism, servitude, slavery, spin media lies, surrendering Constitutional form of government, the take over of America media, Traitors, Treason, Voluntary enslavement Leave a comment
A Nation can be taken over by the enemy via force or by having citizens surrender via voluntary servitude accomplished via deceptive methods. Deception occurs in many forms by spin false reporting media that spoon feeds lies to the public, publications telling even bigger lies than radio or television and by plain propaganda also infiltrated into our educational systems even making its way into primary grades. One would then ask, Who is the enemy? The enemy of America are individuals that wish to dismantle our economy, our families, our rule of law, our rights, our constitution, our health, our jobs, our sanity, our tranquility and in a sense they wish the entire “enchilada” to own everything and all placing God- fearing and respectful people in total servitude to them. The sad part is that many participating in the big “lies” were once citizens just like us who thanks to our rule of law in government and for the most part normal not “crazy” form of government that they wish for us to have; they got great educations but later once succesful sold us all out worse than a Judas. It is a shame since I could never imagine betraying the nation that helped educate me and that allowed the most sanity compared to the rest of the world that once succesful could never even imagine selling it out for power or money. These individuals fail to see that future generations of Americans deserve the same chance; in that of becoming successful, raise good families and have some piece of mind in that their hard work and labor will be secured along with their properties and future ability to be stable and prosperous not slaves to others. America is taking a very dark turn and its up to the Citizens to stand-up for themselves and recognize what is taking place and to be on the alert for sabotage, further orchestrations destroying our land and communities, crops, food and water. Trust that no other form of government nor global entanglements are a solution; for YOU are the solution to repairing America back to work and away from predatory wolves or wanna-be Master Lords stamping over you.
by Theresa Nielsen, Precinct 391 Leader.
Below is another research on how even in the past Lords planned the taking over of populations as if they were cattle on a farm to be managed for their personal greed, hard labor and for profits. A nation must decide to either be free or romanced into surrendering to voluntary servitude. Please do not allow for this to be our fate since the day that America totally surrenders to servitude it will become the new dark ages but then even darker for their chains and weapons of slavery are today even more deadly.
Research by Joyce Rosenwald follows:
The Politics of Obedience: Discourse of Voluntary Servitude
by Éttiene de la Boétie.
Copyright 1993 by Frederick Mann, All Rights Reserved.
Brief Biography of Éttiene de la Boétie
(The modern French pronunciation of “La Boétie” is “La Bo-ay-see.” However, in the local dialect of the area where La Boétie lived his name was pronounced “La Bwettie.”)
Éttiene de la Boétie was born in the southwest of France in Sarlat (near Bordeaux) on November 1, 1530. He died in 1563 at the age of thirty-two (probably from dysentery). La Boétie was orphaned at an early age, and raised by his uncle and namesake, the curate of Bouillonnas. La Boétie wrote Discours de la Servitude Volontaire while a law student at the University of Orléans, probably in 1552 or 1553, at the age of 22. His main teacher at the university was Anne du Bourg, who later became a Huguenot (French Protestant) martyr, burned at the stake in 1559 for “heresy.”
La Boétie’s Discourse of Voluntary Servitude is particularly remarkable in that he was born into a family of terrocrats (coercive government agents or terrorist bureaucrats), and he himself – after graduating with a law degree in 1553 at the University of Orléans – received a royal appointment to the Bordeaux Parliament, where he pursued a career as a judge, a censor, and a diplomatic negotiator, until his death in 1563. In 1562 La Boétie reputedly wrote an unpublished manuscript (discovered in 1913), in which he recommended that Catholicism be enforced upon France, and that Protestant leaders (Huguenots) be persecuted as rebels. (I have no idea why La Boétie, after having written – in my opinion – the most advanced essay on politics, became such a depraved terrocrat.)
The Discourse was originally circulated in manuscript form and was never published by La Boétie. Nevertheless its influence became widespread. La Boétie was a close friend of the famous essayist, Montaigne (Michel Eyquem), whom he met around 1557. La Boétie undoubtedly had a considerable influence on Montaigne, who was born in 1533. In a letter to Henri de Mesmes in 1570, Montaigne wrote:
“So that having loved monsieur de la Boétie more than anything in this world, the greatest man in my opinion of this age, I thought I should grossly fail in my duty, if, knowingly, I should suffer so great a name, and a memory so worthy of esteem, to vanish and be lost, if I did not endeavor, by these pieces [later to become known as the Mesmes Copy of the Discourse] of his, to raise him up and bring him to life.”
Many Huguenot pamphleteers were strongly influenced by the Discourse, and some even claimed it as their own. It was first published in 1574 (anonymously and incompletely) in a Huguenot pamphlet. In 1576 the first complete version of the Discourse was published by Simon Goulart in Holland and Switzerland in a collection of radical Huguenot essays. La Boétie may have indirectly influenced Shakespeare (born around the time of La Boétie’s death) via Montaigne. Some critics have identified Hamlet with Montaigne and Horatio with La Boétie. Francis Bacon was influenced by Montaigne. Bacon’s elder brother spent twelve years near Bordeaux and later corresponded with Montaigne.
Between 1700 and 1939 several editions of the Discourse were published in France, sometimes as supplements to Montaigne’s Essays. It was reprinted twice during the French Revolution. In 1735 an English translation of the Discourse, probably translated by “T[homas]. Smith” was published in London. Around 1833 Emerson wrote his poem, Étienne de la Boèce. Between 1906 and 1908 Tolstoy used extracts from the Discourse in three of his books. In 1907 Gustave Landauer made the Discourse central to his German anarchist book, Die Revolution. In 1933 a Dutch translation by Barthelemy de Ligt was published in The Hague under the title Vrijwillige Slavernij (“Voluntary Slavery”). In 1942 an English translation by Harry Kurz was published in New York under the title Anti-Dictator. In 1947 an edition in modern French was published in Brussels by Hem Day. In 1952 a Russian translation was published in Moscow. In 1974 an edition of the Discourse was published in Colorado Springs under the title The Will to Bondage (Ralph Myles Publisher, Colorado Springs; 1974), containing both the original French text, and the 1735 English translation, with an Introduction by James J. Martin. In 1975 the Harry Kurz translation was republished with an Introduction by Murray N. Rothbard, under the title The Politics of Obedience: The Discourse of Voluntary Servitude (Free Life Editions, NY; 1975). In addition, several books have been written about La Boétie.
Éttiene de la Boétie can certainly be regarded as the father of non-violent (or pacifist) anarchism and civil disobedience. The central question he addresses is: Why do people consent to their own enslavement? One of his central insights is that, to topple a tyranny, the victims only need to withdraw their consent and support. Directly and indirectly La Boétie had a profound influence on the Huguenots, the French Revolutionists, and such notable pacifist anarchists as Tolstoy, Gandhi, Thoreau, and Tucker.
La Boétie also had Rose Wilder Lane’s central insight that humans are free by nature.
Possibly, the most important lesson we can learn from La Boétie’s Discourse is leverage. A student (La Boétie) writes a forty-page essay. An author (Tolstoy) reads the essay and incorporates its main ideas in his Letter to a Hindu. A pacifist rebel (Gandhi) applies the ideas to defeat the British Empire and drive the British out of India.
The La Boétie Analysis
Grasping the “La Boétie analysis” is a key to understanding advanced freedom strategies. La Boétie approached his subject like an outsider observing the strange phenomenon of political behavior. He wrote like someone who had jumped out of “the system” and viewed it without preconceptions. He somehow unbrainwashed himself so he could adopt a “Martian viewpoint.”
What is so remarkable is that La Boétie did this in 1552 or 1553 – four-hundred-and-forty years ago! It is also interesting that modern tyrants use the same formula today to subjugate and dominate their victims. Here are the main elements of the La Boétie analysis as I see it:
• The only power tyrants have is the power relinquished to them by their victims.
• The tyrant is often a weak little man. He has no special qualities that set him apart from anyone else – yet the gullible idolize him.
• The victims bring about their own subjection – they “win their enslavement.”
• If without violence the tyrant is simply not obeyed, he becomes “naked and undone and as nothing.”
• Once you resolve to serve no more, you are free.
• We are all born free and naturally free.
• Grown-up adults should adopt reason as their guide and never become slaves of anybody.
• People can be enslaved through either force or deception.
• When people lose their freedom through deceit, it is because they mislead themselves.
• People born into slavery regard it as a natural condition.
• In general, people are shaped more by their environment than by their natural capacities – if they allow it.
• Habit and custom are powerful forces that keep people enslaved.
• There are always some people who cannot be tamed, subjected, or enslaved. Even if freedom were to be entirely extinguished, these people would re-invent it.
• Lovers of freedom tend to be ineffective because they are not known to one another.
• People who lose their freedom also lose their valor (strength of mind, bravery).
• Among free people there is competition to do good for humanity.
• People seem to be most gullible towards those who deliberately set out to fool them. It is as if people have a need to be deceived.
• Tyrants stupefy their victims with “pastimes and vain pleasures flashed before their eyes.”
• Tyrants parade like “workers of magic.”
• Tyrants can only give back part of what they first took from their victims.
• Tyrants attain their positions through: (a) Force; (b) Birth; or (c) Election.
• Tyrants create a power structure, consisting of a multi-layered hierarchy, staffed by a conspiracy of accomplices. Accomplices receive their positions as a favor from the tyrant.
• The worst dregs of society gather around the tyrant – they are people of weak character who trade servility for unearned wealth.
• Accomplices can profit greatly from their positions in the hierarchy.
• If people withdraw their support, the tyrant topples over from his own corrupted weight.
Discourse of Voluntary Servitude
by Éttiene de la Boétie.
(abridged and edited from the Harry Kurz translation)
For the present I should like merely to understand how it happens that so many men, so many villages, so many cities, so many nations, sometimes suffer under a single tyrant who has no other power than the power they give him; who is able to harm them only to the extent to which they have the willingness to bear with him; who could do them absolutely no injury unless they preferred to put up with him rather than contradict him. Surely a striking situation! Yet it is so common that one must grieve the more and wonder the less at the spectacle of a million men serving in wretchedness, their necks under the yoke, not constrained by a greater multitude than they, but simply, it would seem, delighted and charmed by the name of one man alone whose power they need not fear, for he is evidently the one person whose qualities they cannot admire because of his inhumanity and brutality toward them.
A weakness characteristic of humankind is that we often have to obey force; we have to make concessions; we ourselves cannot always be the stronger. Therefore, when a nation is constrained by the fortune of war to serve as a clique, as happened when the city of Athens served the thirty Tyrants, one should not be amazed that the nation obeys, but simply be grieved by the situation; or rather, instead of being amazed or saddened, consider patiently the evil and look forward hopefully toward a happier future.
Our nature is such that the common duties of human relationship occupy a great part of the course of our life. It is reasonable to love virtue, to esteem good deeds, to be grateful for good from whatever source we may receive it, and, often, to give up some of our comfort in order to increase the honor and advantage of some man whom we love and who deserves it.
Therefore, if the inhabitants of a country have found some great personage who has shown rare foresight in protecting them in an emergency, rare boldness in defending them, rare solicitude in governing them, and if, from that point on, they contract the habit of obeying him and depending on him to such an extent that they grant him certain prerogatives, I fear that such a procedure is not prudent, inasmuch as they remove him from a position in which he may do evil. Certainly while he continues to manifest good will one need fear no harm from a man who seems to be generally well disposed.
But – in the pursuit of understanding – I ask you! What strange phenomenon is this? What name shall we give it? What is the nature of this misfortune? What vice is it, or, rather, what degradation? To see an endless multitude of people not merely obeying, but driven to servility? Not ruled, but tyrannized over? These wretches have no wealth, no kin, nor wife nor children, not even life itself that they can call their own. They suffer plundering, wantonness, cruelty, not from an army, not from a barbarian horde, on account of whom they must shed their blood and sacrifice their lives, but from a single man; not from a Hercules nor from a Sampson, but from a single little man.
Too frequently this same little man is the most cowardly and effeminate in the nation, a stranger to the powder of battle and hesitant on the sands of the tournament; not only without energy to direct men by force, but with hardly enough virility to bed with a common woman! Shall we call subjection to such a leader cowardice? Shall we say that those who serve him are cowardly and faint-hearted?
If two, if three, if four, do not defend themselves from the one, we might call that circumstance surprising but nevertheless conceivable. In such a case one might be justified in suspecting a lack of courage. But if a hundred, if a thousand endure the caprice of a single man, should we not rather say that they lack not the courage but the desire to rise against him, and that such an attitude indicates indifference rather than cowardice?
When not a hundred, not a thousand men, but a hundred provinces, a thousand cities, a million men, refuse to assail a single man from whom the kindest treatment received is the infliction of serfdom and slavery, what shall we call that? Is it cowardice? Of course there is in every vice inevitably some limit beyond which one cannot go. Two, possibly ten, may fear one; but when a thousand, a million men, a thousand cities, fail to protect themselves against the domination of one man, this cannot be called cowardly, for cowardice does not sink to such a depth, any more than valor can be termed the effort of one individual to scale a fortress, to attack an army, or to conquer a kingdom. What monstrous vice, then, is this which does not even deserve to be called cowardice, a vice for which no term can be found vile enough, which nature herself disavows and our tongues refuse to name?
Place on one side fifty thousand armed men, and on the other the same number; let them join in battle, one side fighting to retain its liberty, the other to take it away; to which would you, at a guess, promise victory? Which men do you think would march more gallantly to combat – those who anticipate as a reward for their suffering the maintenance of their freedom, or those who cannot expect any other prize for the blows exchanged than the enslavement of others?
One side will have before its eyes the blessings of the past and the hope of similar joy in the future; their thoughts will dwell less on the comparatively brief pain of battle than on what they may have to endure forever, they, their children, and all their posterity. The other side has nothing to inspire it with courage except the weak urge of greed, which fades before danger and which can never be so keen, it seems to me, that it will not be dismayed by the least drop of blood from wounds.
Consider the justly famous battles of Miltiades, Leonidas, Themistocles, still fresh today in recorded history and in the minds of men as if they had occurred but yesterday, battles fought in Greece for the welfare of the Greeks and as an example to the world. What power do you think gave to a mere handful of men not the strength but the courage to withstand the attack of a fleet so vast that even the seas were burdened, and to defeat the armies of so many nations, armies so immense that their officers alone outnumbered the entire Greek force? What was it but the fact that in those glorious days this struggle represented not so much a fight of Greeks against Persians as a victory of liberty over domination, of freedom over greed?
It amazes us to hear accounts of the valor that liberty arouses in the hearts of those who defend it; but who could believe reports of what goes on every day among the inhabitants of some countries, who could really believe that one man alone may mistreat a hundred thousand and deprive them of their liberty? Who would credit such a report if he merely heard it, without being present to witness the event? And if this condition occurred only in distant lands and were reported to us, which one among us would not assume the tale to be imagined or invented, and not really true?
Obviously there is no need of fighting to overcome this single tyrant, for he is automatically defeated if the country refuses consent to its own enslavement: it is not necessary to deprive him of anything, but simply to give him nothing; there is no need that the country make an effort to do anything for itself provided it does nothing against itself. It is therefore the inhabitants themselves who permit, or, rather, bring about, their own subjection, since by ceasing to submit they would put an end to their servitude.
A people enslaves itself, cuts its own throat, when, having a choice between being vassals and being free men, it deserts its liberties and takes on the yoke, gives consent to its own misery, or, rather, apparently welcomes it. If it costs the people anything to recover its freedom, I should not urge action to this end, although there is nothing a human should hold more dear than the restoration of his own natural right, to change himself from a beast of burden back to a man, so to speak.
I do not demand of him so much boldness; let him prefer the doubtful security of living wretchedly to the uncertain hope of living as he pleases. What then? If in order to have liberty nothing more is needed than to long for it, if only a simple act of the will is necessary, is there any nation in the world that considers a single wish too high a price to pay in order to recover rights which it ought to be ready to redeem at the cost of its blood, rights such that their loss must bring all men of honor to the point of feeling life to be unendurable and death itself a deliverance?
Everyone knows that the fire from a little spark will increase and blaze ever higher as long as it finds wood to burn; yet without being quenched by water, but merely by finding no more fuel to feed on, it consumes itself, dies down, and is no longer a flame. Similarly, the more tyrants pillage, the more they crave, the more they ruin and destroy; the more one yields to them, and obeys them, by that much do they become mightier and more formidable, the readier to annihilate and destroy. But if not one thing is yielded to them, if, without any violence they are simply not obeyed, they become naked and undone and as nothing, just as, when the root receives no nourishment, the branch withers and dies.
To achieve the good that they desire, the bold do not fear danger; the intelligent do not refuse to undergo suffering. It is the stupid and cowardly who are neither able to endure hardship nor to vindicate their rights; they stop at merely longing for them, and lose through timidity the valor roused by the effort to claim their rights, although the desire to enjoy them still remains as part of their nature. A longing common to both the wise and the foolish, to brave men and to cowards, is this longing for all those things which, when acquired, would make them happy and contented.
Yet one element appears to be lacking. I do not know how it happens that nature fails to place within the hearts of men a burning desire for liberty, a blessing so great and so desirable that when it is lost all evils follow thereafter, and even the blessings that remain lose taste and savor because of their corruption by servitude. Liberty is the only joy upon which men do not seem to insist; for surely if they really wanted it they would claim it. Apparently they refuse this wonderful privilege because it is so easily acquired.
Poor, wretched, and stupid peoples, nations determined on your own misfortune and blind to your own good! You let yourselves be deprived before your own eyes of the best part of your revenues; your fields are plundered, your homes robbed, your family heirlooms taken away. You live in such a way that you cannot claim a single thing as your own; and it would seem that you consider yourselves lucky to be loaned your property, your families, and your very lives.
All this havoc, this misfortune, this ruin, descends upon you not from alien foes, but from the one enemy whom you yourselves render as powerful as he is, for whom you go bravely to war, for whose “greatness” you do not refuse to offer your own bodies unto death. He who thus domineers over you has only two eyes, only two hands, only one body, no more than is possessed by the least man among the infinite numbers dwelling in your cities; he has indeed nothing more than the power that you confer upon him to destroy you.
Where has he acquired enough eyes to spy upon you, if you do not provide them yourselves? How can he have so many arms to beat you with, if he does not borrow them from you? The feet that trample down your cities, where does he get them if they are not your own? How does he have any power over you except through you? How would he dare assail you if he had no cooperation from you? What could he do to you if you yourselves did not connive with the thief who plunders you, if you were not accomplices of the murderer who kills you, if you were not traitors to yourselves?
You sow your crops in order that he may ravage them, you install and furnish your homes to give him goods to pillage; you rear your daughters that he may gratify his lust; you bring up your children in order that he may confer upon them the greatest “privilege” he knows – to be led into his battles, to be delivered to butchery, to be made the servants of his greed and the instruments of his vengeance; you yield your bodies unto hard labor in order that he may indulge in his delights and wallow in his filthy pleasures; you weaken yourselves in order to make him the stronger and the mightier to hold you in check.
From all these indignities, such as the very beasts of the field would not endure, you can deliver yourselves if you try, not by taking action, but merely by willing to be free. Resolve to serve no more, and you are at once freed. I do not ask that you place hands upon the tyrant to topple him over, but simply that you support him no longer; then you will behold him, like a great Colossus whose pedestal has been pulled away, fall of his own weight and break into pieces.
Doctors are no doubt correct in warning us not to touch incurable wounds; and I am presumably taking chances in preaching as I do to a people which has lost all sensitivity and, no longer conscious of its infirmity, is plainly suffering from mortal illness. Let us therefore understand by logic, if we can, how it happens that this obstinate willingness to submit has become so deeply rooted that the very love of liberty now seems no longer natural.
In the first place, all would agree that, if we led our lives according to the ways intended by nature and the lessons taught by her, we should be intuitively obedient to our parents; later we should adopt reason as our guide and become slaves to nobody. Concerning the obedience given instinctively to one’s father and mother, we are in agreement, each one admitting himself to be a model. As to whether reason is born with us or not, that is a question loudly discussed by academicians and treated by all schools of philosophers.
For the present I think I do not err in stating that there is in our souls some native seed of reason, which, if nourished by good counsel and training, flowers into virtue, but which on the other hand, if unable to resist the vices surrounding it, is stifled and blighted. Yet surely if there is anything in this world clear and obvious, to which one cannot close one’s eyes, it is the fact that nature has cast us all in the same mold in order that we may behold in one another companions, or rather brothers.
If in distributing her gifts nature has favored some more than others with respect to body or spirit, she has nevertheless not planned to place us within this world as if it were a field of battle, and has not endowed the stronger or the clever in order that they may act like armed brigands in a forest and attack the weaker. One should rather conclude that in distributing larger shares to some and smaller shares to others, nature has intended to give occasion for brotherly love to become manifest, some of us having the strength to give help to others who are in need of it.
Hence, since this kind mother has given us the whole world as a dwelling place, has lodged us in the same house, has fashioned us according to the same model so that in beholding one another we might almost recognize ourselves; since she has bestowed upon us all the great gift of voice and speech for fraternal relationship, thus achieving by the common and mutual statement of our thoughts a communion of our wills; and since she has tried in every way to narrow and tighten the bond of our union and kinship; since she has revealed in every possible manner her intention, not so much to associate us as to make us one organic whole, there can be no further doubt that we are all naturally free, inasmuch as we are all comrades. Accordingly it should not enter the mind of anyone that nature has placed some of us in slavery, since she has actually created us all in one likeness.
Therefore it is fruitless to argue whether or not liberty is natural, since none can be held in slavery without being wronged, and in a world governed by a nature, which is reasonable, there is nothing so contrary as an injustice. Since freedom is our natural state, we are not only in possession of it but have the urge to defend it.
Now, if perchance some cast a doubt on this conclusion and are so corrupted that they are not able to recognize their rights and inborn tendencies, I shall have to do them the honor that is properly theirs and place, so to speak, brute beasts in the pulpit to throw light on their nature and condition. The very beasts, if men are not too deaf, cry out to them, “Long live Liberty!” Many among them die as soon as captured: just as the fish loses life as soon as he leaves the water, so do these creatures close their eyes upon the light and have no desire to survive the loss of their natural freedom.
If the animals were to constitute their kingdom by rank, their nobility would be chosen from this type. Others, from the largest to the smallest, when captured put up such a strong resistance by means of claws, horns, beak, and paws, that they show clearly enough how they cling to what they are losing; afterwards in captivity they manifest by so many evident signs their awareness of their misfortune, that it is easy to see they are languishing rather than living, and continue their existence more in lamentation of their lost freedom than in enjoyment of their servitude.
What else can explain the behavior of the elephant who, after defending himself to the last ounce of his strength and knowing himself on the point of being taken, dashes his jaws against the trees and breaks his tusks, thus manifesting his longing to remain free as he has been and proving his wit and ability to buy off the huntsmen in the hope that through the sacrifice of his tusks he will be permitted to offer his ivory as a ransom for his liberty? We feed the horse from birth in order to train him to do our bidding.
Yet he is tamed with such difficulty that when we begin to break him in he bites the bit, he rears at the touch of the spur, as if to reveal his instinct and show by his actions that, if he obeys, he does not of his own free will but under constraint. What more can we say? And now, since all beings, because they feel, suffer misery in subjection and long for liberty; since the very beasts, although made for the service of man, cannot become accustomed to control without protest, what evil chance has so denatured man that he, the only creature really born to be free, lacks the memory of his original condition and the desire to return to it?
There are three kinds of tyrants; some receive their proud position through elections by the people, others by force of arms, others by inheritance. Those who have acquired power by means of war, act in such wise that it is evident they rule over a conquered country. Those who are born to kingship are scarcely any better, because they are nourished on the breast of tyranny, suck in with their milk the instincts of the tyrant, and consider the people under them their inherited serfs; and according to their individual disposition, miserly or prodigal, they treat their kingdom as their property.
He who has received his position from the people, however, ought to be, it seems to me, more bearable and would be so, I think, were it not for the fact that as soon as he sees himself higher than the others, flattered by that quality which we call grandeur, he plans never to relinquish his position. Such a man usually determines to pass on to his children the authority that the people have conferred upon him; and once his heirs have taken this attitude, strange it is how far they surpass other tyrants in all sorts of vices, and especially in cruelty, because they find no other means to impose this new tyranny than by tightening control and removing their subjects so far from any notion of liberty that even if the memory of it is fresh it will soon be eradicated.
Yet, to speak accurately, I do perceive that there is some difference among these three types of tyranny, but as for stating a preference, I cannot grant there is any. For although the means of coming into power differ, still the method of ruling is practically the same; those who are elected act as if they were breaking in bullocks; those who are conquerors make the people their prey; those who are heirs plan to treat them as if they were their natural slaves.
In connection with this, let us imagine some newborn individuals, neither acquainted with slavery nor desirous of liberty, ignorant indeed of the very words. If they were permitted to choose between being slaves and free men, to which would they give their vote? There can be no doubt that they would much prefer to be guided by reason itself than to be ordered about by the whims of a single man. Certainly all men, as long as they remain men, before letting themselves become enslaved must either be driven by force or led into it by deception; conquered by foreign armies, as were Sparta and Athens by the forces of Alexander or by political factions, as when at an earlier period the control of Athens had passed into the hands of Pisistrates.
When they lose their liberty through deceit they are not so often betrayed by others as misled by themselves. This was the case with the people of Syracuse, chief city of Sicily when, in the throes of war and heedlessly planning only for the present danger, they promoted Denis, their first tyrant, by entrusting to him the command of the army, without realizing that they had given him such power that on his victorious return this “worthy” man would behave as if he had vanquished not his enemies but his compatriots, transforming himself from captain to tyrant.
It is incredible how as soon as a people becomes subject, it promptly falls into such complete forgetfulness of its freedom that it can hardly be roused to the point of regaining it, obeying so easily and so willingly that one is led to say, on beholding such a situation, that this people has not so much lost its liberty as won its enslavement. It is true that in the beginning men submit under constraint and by force; but those who come after them obey without regret and perform willingly what their predecessors had done because they had to.
This is why men born under the yoke and then nourished and reared in slavery are content, without further effort, to live in their native circumstance, unaware of any other state or right, and considering as quite natural the condition into which they were born. There is, however, no heir so spendthrift or indifferent that he does not sometimes scan the account books of his father in order to see if he is enjoying all the privileges of his legacy or whether, perchance, his rights and those of his predecessor have not been encroached upon.
Nevertheless it is clear enough that the powerful influence of custom is in no respect more compelling than in this, namely, habituation to subjection. It is said that Mithridates trained himself to drink poison. Like him we learn to swallow, and not to find bitter, the venom of servitude. It cannot be denied that nature is influential in shaping us to her will and making us reveal our rich or meager endowment; yet it must be admitted that she has less power over us than custom, for the reason that native endowment, no matter how good, is dissipated unless encouraged, whereas environment always shapes us in its own way, whatever that may be, in spite of nature’s gifts.
The good seed that nature plants in us is so slight and so slippery that it cannot withstand the least harm from wrong nourishment; it flourishes less easily, becomes spoiled, withers, and comes to nothing. Fruit trees retain their own particular quality if permitted to grow undisturbed, but lose it promptly and bear strange fruit not their own when ingrafted. Every herb has its peculiar characteristics, its virtues and properties; yet frost, weather, soil, or the gardener’s hand increase or diminish its strength; the plant seen in one spot cannot be recognized in another.
Whoever could have observed the early Venetians, a handful of people living so freely that the most wicked among them would not wish to be king over them, so born and trained that they would not vie with one another except as to which one could give the best counsel and nurture their liberty most carefully, so instructed and developed from their cradles that they would not exchange for all the other delights of the world an iota of their freedom; who, I say, familiar with the original nature of such a people, could visit today the territories of the man known as the Great Doge, and there contemplate with composure a people unwilling to live except to serve him, and maintaining his power at the cost of their lives?
Who would believe that these two groups of people had an identical origin? Would one not rather conclude that upon leaving a city of men he had chanced upon a menagerie of beasts? Lycurgus, the lawgiver of Sparta, is reported to have reared two dogs of the same litter by fattening one in the kitchen and training the other in the fields to the sound of the bugle and the horn, thereby to demonstrate to the Lacedaemonians that men, too, develop according to their early habits.
He set the two dogs in the open market place, and between them he placed a bowl of soup and a hare. One ran to the bowl of soup, the other to the hare; yet they were, as he maintained, born brothers of the same parents. In such manner did this leader, by his laws and customs, shape and instruct the Spartans so well that any one of them would sooner have died than acknowledge any sovereign other than law and reason.
I am of the opinion that one should pity those who, at birth, arrive with the yoke upon their necks. We should exonerate and forgive them, since they have not seen even the shadow of liberty, and, being quite unaware of it, cannot perceive the evil endured through their own slavery. It is truly the nature of man to be free and to wish to be so, yet his character is such that he instinctively follows the tendencies that his training gives him.
Let us therefore admit that all those things to which he is trained and accustomed seem natural to man and that only that is truly native to him which he receives with his primitive, untrained individuality. Thus custom becomes the first reason for voluntary servitude. Men are like handsome racehorses who first bite the bit and later like it, and rearing under the saddle a while soon learn to enjoy displaying their harness and prance proudly beneath their trappings. Similarly men will grow accustomed to the idea that they have always been in subjection, that their fathers lived in the same way; they will think that they are obliged to suffer this evil, and will persuade themselves by example and imitation of others, finally investing those who order them around with proprietary rights, based on the idea that it has always been that way.
There are always a few, better endowed than others, who feel the weight of the yoke and cannot restrain themselves from attempting to shake it off: these are the men who never become tamed under subjection. These are in fact the men who, possessed of clear minds and far-sighted spirit, are not satisfied, like the brutish mass, to see only what is at their feet, but rather look about them, behind and before, and even recall the things of the past in order to judge those of the future, and compare both with their present condition. These are the ones who, having good minds of their own, have further trained them by study and learning. Even if liberty had entirely perished from the earth, such men would invent it. For them slavery has no satisfactions, no matter how well disguised.
The Grand Turk was well aware that books and teaching more than anything else give men the sense to comprehend their own nature and to detest tyranny. I understand that in his territory there are few educated people, for he does not want many. On account of this restriction, men of strong zeal and devotion, who in spite of the passing of time have preserved their love of freedom, still remain ineffective because, however numerous they may be, they are not known to one another; under the tyrant they have lost freedom of action, of speech, and almost of thought; they are alone in their aspiration.
The essential reason why men take orders willingly is that they are born serfs and are reared as such. From this cause there follows another result, namely that people easily become cowardly and submissive under tyrants. For this observation I am deeply grateful to Hippocrates, the renowned father of medicine, who noted and reported it in a treatise of his entitled Concerning Diseases.
This famous man was certainly endowed with a great heart and proved it clearly by his reply to the “Great King,” who wanted to attach him to his person by means of special privileges and large gifts. Hippocrates answered frankly that it would be a weight on his conscience to make use of his science for the cure of barbarians who wished to slay his fellow Greeks, or to serve faithfully by his skill anyone who undertook to enslave Greece. The letter he sent this tyrant can still be read among his other works and will forever testify to his great heart and noble character.
By this time it should be evident that liberty once lost, valor [strength of mind, bravery] also perishes. A subject people shows neither gladness nor eagerness in combat: its men march sullenly to danger almost as if in bonds, and stultified; they do not feel throbbing within them that eagerness for liberty which engenders scorn of peril and imparts readiness to acquire honor and glory by a brave death amidst one’s comrades.
Among free men there is competition as to who will do most, each for the common good, each by himself, all expecting to share in the misfortunes of defeat, or in the benefits of victory; but an enslaved people loses in addition to this warlike courage, all signs of enthusiasm, for their hearts are degraded, submissive, and incapable of any great deed. Tyrants are well aware of this, and, in order to degrade their subjects further, encourage them to assume this attitude and make it instinctive.
It is indeed the nature of the populace, whose density is always greater in the cities, to be suspicious toward one who claims to have their welfare at heart, and gullible toward one who fools them. Do not imagine that there is any bird more easily caught by decoy, nor any fish sooner fixed on the hook by wormy bait, than are all these poor fools neatly tricked into servitude by the slightest feather passed, so to speak, before their mouths.
Truly it is a marvelous thing that they let themselves be caught so quickly at the slightest tickling of their fancy. Plays, farces, spectacles, gladiators, strange beasts, medals, pictures, and other such opiates, these were for ancient peoples the bait toward slavery, the price of their liberty, the instruments of tyranny. By these practices and enticements the ancient dictators so successfully lulled their subjects under the yokes, that the stupefied peoples, fascinated by the pastimes and vain pleasures flashed before their eyes, learned subservience as naively, but not so creditably, as little children learn to read by looking at bright picture books.
Roman tyrants invented a further refinement. They often provided the city wards with feasts to cajole the rabble, always more readily tempted by the pleasure of eating than by anything else. The most intelligent and understanding amongst them would not have quit his soup bowl to recover the liberty of the Republic of Plato. Tyrants would distribute largess, a bushel of wheat, a gallon of wine, and a sesterce: and then everybody would shamelessly cry, “Long live the King!” The fools did not realize that they were merely recovering a portion of their own property, and that their ruler could not have given them what they were receiving without having first taken it from them.
A man might one day be presented with a sesterce [Roman coin] and gorge himself at the public feast, lauding Tiberius and Nero for handsome liberality, who on the morrow, would be forced to abandon his property to their avarice, his children to their lust, his very blood to the cruelty of these magnificent “Emperors” without offering any more resistance than a stone or a tree stump. The mob has always behaved in this way – eagerly open to bribes that cannot be honorably accepted, and dissolutely callous to degradation and insult that cannot be honorably endured.
They didn’t even neglect, these “Roman Emperors,” to assume generally the title of “Tribune of the People,” partly because this office was held sacred and inviolable and also because it had been founded for the defense and protection of the people. By this means they made sure that the populace would trust them completely, as if they merely used the title and did not abuse it. Today there are some who do not behave very differently; they never undertake an unjust policy, even one of some importance, without prefacing it with some pretty speech concerning “public welfare” and “common good.”
The earliest Kings of Egypt rarely showed themselves without carrying a cat, or sometimes a branch, or appearing with fire on their heads, masking themselves with these objects and parading like workers of magic. By doing this they inspired their subjects with reverence and admiration, whereas with people neither too stupid nor too slavish they would merely have aroused, it seems to me, amusement and laughter. It is pitiful to review the list of devices that despots have used to establish their tyranny; to discover how many little tricks they employed, always finding the populace conveniently gullible, readily caught in the net as soon as it was spread. Indeed they always fooled their victims so easily that while mocking them they enslaved them the more.
What comment can I make concerning another fine counterfeit that ancient peoples accepted as true money? They believed firmly that the great toe of Pyrrhus, tyrant of Epirus, performed miracles and cured diseases of the spleen; they even enhanced the tale further with the legend that his toe, after the corpse had been burned, was found among the ashes, untouched by the fire. In this wise a foolish people itself invents lies and then believes them.
Many men have recounted such things, but in such a way that it is easy to see that the parts were pieced together from idle gossip of the city and silly reports from the rabble. When Vespasian, returning from Assyria, passes through Alexandria on his way to Rome to take possession of the empire, he performs wonders: he makes the crippled straight, restores sight to the blind, and does many other fine things, concerning which the credulous and undiscriminating were, in my opinion, more blind than those cured. Tyrants themselves have wondered that men could endure the persecution of a single man; they have insisted on using religion for their own protection and, where possible, have borrowed a stray bit of “divinity” to bolster up their evil ways.
Our own leaders have employed in France certain similar devices, such as toads, fleurs-de-lys, sacred vessels, and standards with flames of gold. However that may be, I do not wish, for my part, to be incredulous, since neither we nor our ancestors have had any occasion up to now for skepticism.
It has always happened that tyrants, in order to strengthen their power, have made every effort to train their people not only in obedience and servility toward themselves, but also in adoration. Therefore all that I have said up to the present concerning the means by which a more willing submission has been obtained applies to dictators in their relationship with the inferior and common classes.
I come now to a point which is, in my opinion, the mainspring and the secret of domination, the support and foundation of tyranny. Whoever thinks that halberds [battle-axes], sentries, the placing of the watch, serve to protect and shield tyrants is, in my judgment, completely mistaken. These are used, it seems to me, more for ceremony and a show of force than for any reliance placed in them.
It is not the troops on horseback, it is not the companies afoot, it is not arms that defend the tyrant. This does not seem credible on first thought, but it is nevertheless true that there are only four or five who maintain the dictator, four or five who keep the country in bondage to him. Five or six have always had access to his ear, and have either gone to him of their own accord, or else have been summoned by him, to be accomplices in his cruelties, companions in his pleasures, panders to his lusts, and sharers in his plunders.
These six manage their chief so successfully that he comes to be held accountable not only for his own misdeeds but even for theirs. The six have six hundred who profit under them, and with the six hundred they do what they have accomplished with their tyrant. The six hundred maintain under them six thousand, whom they promote in rank, upon whom they confer the government of provinces or the direction of finances, in order that they may serve as instruments of avarice and cruelty, executing orders at the proper time and working such havoc all around that they could not last except under the shadow of the six hundred, nor be exempt from law and punishment except through their influence.
The consequence of all this is fatal indeed. And whoever is pleased to unwind the skein [reel of yarn or thread] will observe that not the six thousand but a hundred thousand, and even millions, cling to the tyrant by this cord to which they are tied. According to Homer, Jupiter boasts of being able to draw to himself all the gods when he pulls a chain. Such a scheme caused the increase in the senate under Julius, the formation of new ranks, the creation of offices; not really, if properly considered, to reform justice, but to provide new supporters of despotism.
In short, when the point is reached, through big favors or little ones, that large profits or small are obtained under a tyrant, there are found almost as many people to whom tyranny seems advantageous as those to whom liberty would seem desirable. Whenever a ruler makes himself a dictator, all the wicked dregs who are corrupted by burning ambition or extraordinary avarice, these gather around him and support him in order to have a share in the booty and to constitute themselves petty chiefs under the big tyrant.
This is the practice among notorious robbers and famous pirates: some scour the country, others pursue voyagers; some lie in ambush, others keep a lookout; some commit murder, others robbery; and although there are among them differences in rank, some being only underlings while others are chieftains of gangs, yet is there not a single one among them who does not feel himself to be a sharer, if not of the main booty, at least in the pursuit of it.
Thus the despot subdues his subjects, some of them by means of others, and thus is he protected by those from whom, if they were decent men, he would have to guard himself; just as, in order to split wood, one has to use a wedge of the wood itself. Such are his archers, his guards, his halberdiers [soldiers with battle-axes]; not that they themselves do not suffer occasionally at his hands, but this riff-raff, can be led to endure evil if permitted to commit it, not against him who exploits them, but against those who like themselves submit, but are helpless.
Nevertheless, observing those men who painfully serve the tyrant in order to win some profit from his tyranny and from the subjection of the populace, I am often overcome with amazement at their wickedness and sometimes by pity for their folly. For, in all honesty, can it be in any way except in folly that you approach a tyrant, withdrawing further from your liberty and, so to speak, embracing with both hands your servitude?
Let such men lay aside briefly their ambition, or let them forget for a moment their avarice, and look at themselves as they really are. Then they will realize clearly that the townspeople, the peasants whom they trample underfoot and treat worse than convicts or slaves, they will realize, I say, that these people, mistreated as they may be, are nevertheless, in comparison with themselves, better off and fairly free.
The tiller of the soil and the artisan, no matter how enslaved, discharge their obligation when they do what they are told to do; but the dictator sees men about him wooing and begging his favor, and doing much more than he tells them to do. Such men must not only obey orders; they must anticipate his wishes; to satisfy him they must foresee his desires; they must wear themselves out, torment themselves, kill themselves with work in his interest, and accept his pleasure as their own, neglecting their preference for his, distorting their character and corrupting their nature; they must pay heed to his words, to his intonation, to his gestures, and to his glance. Let them have no eye, nor foot, nor hand that is not alert to respond to his wishes or to seek out his thoughts.
Can that be called a happy life? Can it be called living? Is there anything more intolerable than that situation, I won’t say for a man of mettle nor even for a man of high birth, but simply for a man of common sense or, to go even further, for anyone having the face of a man? What condition is more wretched than to live thus, with nothing to call one’s own, receiving from someone else one’s sustenance, one’s power to act, one’s body, one’s very life?
Still men accept servility in order to acquire wealth; as if they could acquire anything of their own when they cannot even assert that they belong to themselves, or as if anyone could possess under a tyrant a single thing in his own name. Yet they act as if their wealth really belonged to them, and forget that it is they themselves who give the ruler the power to deprive everybody of everything, leaving nothing that anyone can identify as belonging to somebody. They notice that nothing makes men so subservient to a tyrant’s cruelty as property; that the possession of wealth is the worst of crimes against him, punishable even by death; that he loves nothing quite so much as money and ruins only the rich, who come before him as before a butcher, offering themselves so stuffed and bulging that they make his mouth water.
These favorites should not recall so much the memory of those who have won great wealth from tyrants as of those who, after they had for some time amassed it, have lost to him their property as well as their lives; they should consider not how many others have gained a fortune, but rather how few of them have kept it. Whether we examine ancient history or simply the times in which we live, we shall see clearly how great is the number of those who, having by shameful means won the ear of tyrants – who either profit from their villainies or take advantage of their naivety – were in the end reduced to nothing by these very tyrants; and although at first such servitors were met by a ready willingness to promote their interests, they later found an equally obvious inconstancy which brought them to ruin.
Certainly among so large a number of people who have at one time or another had some relationship with bad rulers, there have been few or practically none at all who have not felt applied to themselves the tyrant’s animosity, which they had formerly stirred against others. Most often, after becoming rich by despoiling others, under the favor of his protection, they find themselves at last enriching him with their own spoils.
Quite generally known is the striking phrase of that other tyrant who, gazing at the throat of his wife, a woman he dearly loved and without whom it seemed he could not live, caressed her with this charming comment: “This lovely throat would be cut at once if I but gave the order.” That is why the majority of the dictators of former days were commonly slain by their closest favorites who, observing the nature of tyranny, could not be so confidant of the whim of the tyrant as they were distrustful of his power Thus was Domitian killed by Stephen, Commodus by one of his mistresses, Antoninus by Macrinus, and practically all the others in similar violent fashion.
The fact is that the tyrant is never truly loved, nor does he love. Friendship is a sacred word, a holy thing; it is never developed except between persons of character, and never takes root except through mutual respect; it flourishes not so much by kindness as by sincerity. What makes one friend sure of another is the knowledge of his integrity: as guarantees he has his friend’s fine nature, his honor, and his constancy. There can be no friendship where there is cruelty, where there is disloyalty, where there is injustice. And in places where the wicked gather there is conspiracy only, not companionship: these have no affection for one another; fear alone holds them together; they are not friends, they are merely accomplices.
Although it might not be impossible, yet it would be difficult to find true friendship in a tyrant; elevated above others and having no companions, he finds himself already beyond the pale of friendship, which receives its real sustenance from an equality that, to proceed without a limp, must have its two limbs equal. That is why there is honor among thieves (or so it is reported) in the sharing of the booty; they are peers and comrades; if they are not fond of one another they at least respect one another and do not seek to lessen their strength by squabbling.
But the favorites of a tyrant can never feel entirely secure, and the less so because he has learned from them that he is all powerful and unlimited by any law or obligation. Thus it becomes his wont to consider his own will as reason enough, and to be master of all with never an equal. Therefore it seems a pity that with so many examples at hand, with the danger always present, no one is anxious to act the wise man at the expense of the others, and that among so many persons fawning upon their ruler there is not a single one who has the wisdom and the boldness to say to him what, according to the fable, the fox said to the lion who feigned illness: “I should be glad to enter your lair to pay my respects; but I see many tracks of beasts that have gone toward you, yet not a single trace of any who have come back.”
These wretches see the glint of the despot’s treasures and are bedazzled by the radiance of his splendor. Drawn by this brilliance they come near, without realizing they are approaching a flame that cannot fail to scorch them. Similarly attracted, the indiscreet satyr of the old fables, on seeing the bright fire brought down by Prometheus, found it so beautiful that he went and kissed it, and was burned; so, as the Tuscan poet reminds us, the moth, intent upon desire, seeks the flame because it shines, and also experiences its other quality, the burning.
Moreover, even admitting that favorites may at times escape from the hands of him they serve, they are never safe from the ruler who comes after him. If he is good, they must render an account of their past and recognize at last that justice exists; if he is bad and resembles their late master, he will certainly have his own favorites, who are not usually satisfied to occupy in their turn merely the posts of their predecessors, but will more often insist on their wealth and their lives.
Can anyone be found, then, who under such perilous circumstances and with so little security will still be ambitious to fill such an ill-fated position and serve, despite such perils, so dangerous a master? What suffering, what martyrdom all this involves! To be occupied night and day in planning to please one person, and yet to fear him more than anyone else in the world; to be always on the watch, ears open, wondering whence the blow will come; to search out conspiracy, to be on guard against snares, to scan the faces of companions for signs of treachery, to smile at everybody and be mortally afraid of all, to be sure of nobody, either as an open enemy or as a reliable friend; showing always a gay countenance despite an apprehensive heart, unable to be joyous yet not daring to be sad!
However, there is satisfaction in examining what they get out of all this torment, what advantage they derive from all the trouble of their wretched existence. Actually, the people never blame the tyrant for the evils they suffer, but they do place responsibility on those who influence him; peoples, nations, all compete with one another, even the peasants, even the tillers of the soil, in mentioning the names of the favorites, in analyzing their vices, and heaping upon them a thousand maledictions.
All their prayers, all their vows are directed against these persons; they hold them accountable for all their misfortunes, their pestilences; and if at times they show them outward respect, at those very moments they are fuming in their hearts and hold them in greater horror than wild beasts. This is the glory and honor heaped upon influential favorites for their services by people who, if they could tear apart their living bodies, would still clamor for more, only half satiated by the agony they might behold. For even when the favorites are dead those who live after are never too lazy to blacken the names of these man-eaters with the ink of a thousand pens, tear their reputations into bits in a thousand books, and drag, so to speak, their bones past posterity, forever punishing them after their death for their wicked lives.
Let us therefore learn while there is yet time, let us learn to claim our liberty. Let us open our eyes to our natural freedom for the sake of our honor, for the very love of virtue. As for me, I truly believe I am right, since there is nothing so contrary to reason as self-imposed tyranny. I believe the time will come when support will be withdrawn from tyrants and their accomplices. Then let us watch them all fall from their own corrupted weight.
June 14, 2011
Many blame the enactment of the 14th Amendment as the beginning of the slippery slope taking us into Statism default dependence on government and away from our States’ of residence self-reliance or independence. There are many documents that may need review since the research is extensive and reading it is almost like an Agatha Christy mystery novel. It’s hard to identify the writers for most of the information is like a shared effort between individuals from all walks of life who have contributed to it. This article here is another contribution by Joyce Rosenwald so those interested in learning more about the many twist and turns of the 14th Amendment could have it available for discussion or legal research. I must admit that I am not an expert in this area and the reason I am posting is that there is ongoing concerns with how this amendment affected our form of government and its impact on our ability to retain liberty. The public has a right to know about the 14th Amendment and have some information for further reseach and as always please do secondary research.
Joyce’s information follows below:
DESTROYED FROM WITHIN?
Allegiance to federal government must take priority over allegiance to God.
U.S. v. MACINTOSH, 283 U.S. 605 (1931)
Since 1946 we are at a place where the Humanist-infected Court believes that God is dead, and is looking for a paradigm or metaphor that can be used to purge this dead religion from American life and institutions.
All the states’ laws were taken over and were being written by the Private BAR by 1946. COINCIDENCE?
Model State Administrative Procedure Acts (1946) (National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, 9C U.L.A. 179 (1957), Id 1961, 14 U.L.A.
357 (1980), Id 1981, 14 U.L.A. 73 (Supp. 1985).
It appears the attempt to destroy the nation from within is not a conspiracy….
IT IS FACT!
The bar encourages upholding and using the 14th amendment to socially engineer the people to go to a place they do not wish to go, which is into a socialist state where God is dead and government is viewed as God.
What is the 14th amendment?
Is it a social contract?
Is it a gift, as was the Trojan Horse?
United States v. Celestine, 215 U.S. 278, 30 S.Ct. 93, 54 L.Ed. 195 (1909)
U.S. citizenship was refered to as “a gift.”
Whatever it is, it appears to be a mechanism of law that can enslave by
forced legislation to take your G-D given rights and replace them with privileges from government.
As a 14th amendment citizen you receive compelled benefits. As a result, the court will tell you they will not rule on the constitutionally of an act for anyone who receives a benefit from government.
THIS ONE COURT RULE, known as ASHWANDER RULE #6,
appears to have made your constitutions null and void.
Of course, the Ashwander rules were also written by Judges.
YOU ARE NOW IN A CATCH 22 POSITION.
YOU HAVE LOST THE ABILITY TO CHALLENGE AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL ACT BY CONGRESS!
SO, what do you get as a 14th amendment citizen?
Here’s what the court said:
“The only absolute and unqualified right of a United States citizen is to have a residence within the territorial boundaries of the United States”
US vs. Valentine 288 F. Supp. 957
OH…..there’s one more important right you have as a 14th amendment citizen. . You get to pay the federal debt without the right to challenge it!
Government calls this a gift?
CAN YOU GIVE IT BACK?
NOTICE, 14TH amendment citizens only have 2 rights. All other gifts from government are privileges, and privileges can be removed by the courts.
It appears the lawyers have the system under their thumb.
No private judiciary you say? How about if I prove the constitutional judiciary was destroyed by President Lincoln, who also gave you the 14th amendment, and he replaced it with the DOJ under direct control of the executive.
“Congressional Globe”. The following are excerpts from the April 20th through 29th, 1870 “Congressional Globe” concerning H.R. 1328 which established the Department of Justice to CONTINUE TO CARRY OUT MARTIAL LAW
RULE nearly five years after the end of the Civil War:
“The following bureaus shall be established in this department [the Department of Justice]: a Bureau of International Law,[international law was introduced into law for the american people in 1865, under Lincoln, who gave you the 14th amendment] a Bureau of Revenue Law, a Bureau of Military and Naval Law, a Bureau of Postal Law, a Bureau of Land Management Law.”
Congressman Lawrence then said in the record:
“This Bill, however, does transfer to the Law Department, or the Department of Justice as it is now called, the cognizance of all subjects of martial law, and the cognizance of all subjects of military and naval law, except that portion of the administration of military justice which relates to military court martial, their proceedings, and the supervision of records.
“If a question of martial law is to be determined by the law officers of government, it will now belong to the Attorney General, or to this Department of Justice. It will not belong to the Judge Advocate General of the Army. He will not be called upon for any opinion relating to martial law or military law except as to that portion of the administration of military law which relates to military justice. ” [you got provisional military courts which you still live under]
“In other words, the Judge Advocate General, instead of giving legal opinions to the Secretary of War relating to the status of the states of the union, their right to call upon the government for military protection, or military aid, and other grave Constitutional questions, will be limited. The Judge Advocate General will perform duties administrative in their character and almost exclusively so.
“But I will state to the House why, in my judgment, no transfer of the Judge Advocate General or of his duties to the Department of Justice has been proposed in this Bill. If this had been done, the Bill would have encountered the opposition of some of the officers of the Bureau of Military Justice and their friends, and so great is the power of men in office, so difficult is it to abolish an office, that we were compelled in the consideration of this subject to leave officers in this Bureau untouched in their official tenure in order that this Bill might get through Congress.
“But so far as the Solicitor and Naval Judge Advocate General is concerned, he is transferred with all his supervisory power over naval court partials and the records and proceedings of such courts, so that to that extent, this Bill accomplishes the great purpose which it has in view of bringing into one department the whole legal service of the government. It is misfortunate that there should be different constructions of the laws of the United States by different law officers of the United States.”
WHAT IS THIS ALL ABOUT:
These traitors knew they would have encountered opposition from the military with the provisions of H.R. 1328, so they decided to leave the military officers untouched during their tenure, and transfer them to supervisory positions over court partials. This appeased the military leaders, who didn’t have the foggiest idea as to what was really going on.
Had the traitors fleeced the military of all their powers during their tenure in office, the military would have realized and possibly taken some military action. But as nothing was happening at the hen house, they slept through this entire situation which resulted in an overthrow of the Constitution — an overthrow under which government pretended to operate in 1933, and under which it continues to pretend to operate today.
The traitors were now faced with a very serious problem, namely, what to do with the powers of the Office of the Judge Advocate General when their tenure in office expired. And they solved this dilemma by adding the following amendments, detailed in that same “Congressional Globe”:
Congressman Jenks: “I move to amend Section 3 by inserting the word “naval” before the words “Judge Advocate General”.
The amendment was agreed to and later Congressman Finkelburg stated:
“I would suggest the propriety of amending the third section of this Bill by inserting after the words “the Naval Solicitor and Naval Judge Advocate General” the words “who shall hereafter be known as Naval Solicitor”.
Mr. Jenks: I have no objection to that amendment.
This amendment was also agreed to, and the Office of the Judge Advocate General became known as the Naval Solicitor. Thus, when the existing tenure was over, the new office would have a different set of rules and regulations so that the Bill accomplished the great purpose which it had in view of bringing into one department the whole legal service of the government without the power of the Office of the Judge Advocate General getting in their way.
THIS WAS A NECESSARY STEP TO BRING THE PRESIDENT INTO THE POSITION OF DICTATOR OVER AMERICA.
But they had one other problem facing them, namely, DIRECT ACCESS to the Treasury for the Department of Justice without interference. They accomplished this by the following three sections of the Bill:
“…The Eighth Section provides that the Attorney General is hereby empowered to make all necessary rules and regulations for the government….
“…The Eleventh Section provides that all monies hereafter drawn out of the Treasury upon requisition of the Attorney General shall be dispersed by such one of the clerks herein provided for the Attorney General as he may designate, and so much of the First Section of the Act, making appropriations, past March 3rd, 1859, as provides that money drawn out of the Treasury upon requisition of the Attorney General shall be dispersed by such dispersing officer as the Secretary of the Treasury is hereby repealed….
“…The Fifteenth Section provides that the supervisory powers now exercised by the Secretary of the Interior over the accounts of the district attorneys, marshals, clerks, and other officers of the courts of the United States, shall be exercised by the Attorney General….”
It is important here to remember that under the Trading with the Enemy Act, the District Courts of the United States are:
“…hereby given jurisdiction to make and enter all such rules as to notice and otherwise and all such orders and decrees and to issue such process as may be necessary and proper in the premises to enforce the provisions of this Act.”
It is here that we find out that the district attorneys, marshals, clerks and other officers of the courts are under the Department of Justice. That seems an obvious statement, given the state of the nation today. But the REAL PROBLEM — given the broad scope of powers granted the District Courts under the Trading with the Enemy Act — is that the Department of Justice is *NOT* a part of the Judicial Branch of Government! The judicial branch is now an agency under the executive!
According to Section 101 of Title 5 of the United States Code, the Department of State, the Department of Treasury, the Department of Defense, the DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, the Department of the Interior, the Department of Agriculture, the Department of Commerce, the Department of Health, Education and Welfare, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Department of Transportation, the Department of Energy, the Department of
Education, and the Department of the Veteran Affairs are *ALL* federal agencies under the Executive Branch of Government.
Compare what’s above with what’s below:
If we went to the library today and picked up a copy of Title 12 USC and went to Section 95 (b) we will find a law which states:
“The actions, regulations, rules, licenses, orders and proclamations heretofore or hereafter taken, promulgated, made, or issued by the President of the United States or the Secretary of the Treasury since March the 4th, 1933, pursuant to the authority conferred by Subsection (b) of Section 5 of the Act of October 6th, 1917, as amended [12 USCS Sec. 95a], are hereby approved and confirmed. (Mar. 9, 1933, 48 Stat. 1.)”.
No need to read bills before they are voted on. They’ve been confirmed as passed since 1933.
Not only that, but the Secretary of the Treasury gets any bill he wants passed, confirmed as passed. We get 2 presidents for the price of 1!
Below are more wonderful things the court is doing for us:
EVERSON v. BOARD OF EDUCATION, 330 U.S. 1 (1947) – “The Establishment Clause did not require government neutrality between religion and irreligion …. There is simply no historical foundation for the proposition that the Framers intended to build the “wall of separation” that was constitutionalized in Everson. Wm.Rehnquist
MCCOLLUM v. BOARD OF EDUCATION, 333 U.S. 203 (1948) – “We are all agreed that the First and the Fourteenth Amendments have a secular reach far more penetrating in the conduct of Government than merely to forbid an ‘established church.'” Justice Felix Frankfurter
TORCASO v. WATKINS, 367 U.S. 488 (1961) – The day after the U.S. Constitution was ratified, every state in the union believed that an oath was an appeal to God. Since atheists did not believe in God, they could not take an oath, and so atheists were not permitted to hold public office or testify in courts. The First Amendment was designed to keep the federal government from interfering in the way states understood their duties to God. “Congress shall make no law . . . .”
All of that changed in 1961 when the Supreme Court determined that the 14th Amendment gave the court the power to amend a state constitution where that constitution dealt with religion.
ENGEL v. VITALE, 370 U.S. 421 (1962) – Every session of Congress begins with prayer. Do Christians in schools have the same rights? Because of the 14th Amendment and this case, No; they’re not even allowed to read the prayers from Capitol Hill (State Brd. of Educ v. Netcong, 262 A.2d 21 (1970).
ABINGTON SCHOOL DIST. v. SCHEMPP, 374 U.S. 203 (1963) – 14th Amendment used to remove voluntary Bible reading from government schools
WALZ v. TAX COMMISSION OF CITY OF NEW YORK , 397 U.S. 664 (1970) – Churches could be destroyed under the 14th Amendment, but Court says they serve the secular purpose of making America look “pluralistic.”
LEMON v. KURTZMAN, 403 U.S. 602 (1971) – Based on the Walz case and the 14th Amendment, the Court invents the “Lemon Test”: Every legislation must have for its purpose a goal which is acceptable to Secular Humanists, its primary effect must not be to advance the interests of those who oppose Secular Humanism, and it must not bring the government “under God” in an “excessive” way. Is there any wonder that Secularism has advanced so?
STONE v. GRAHAM, 449 U.S. 39 (1980) – 14th Amendment allows federal courts to reach into local school classrooms and rip any copy of the Ten Commandments off the wall because they might “induce the schoolchildren to read, meditate upon, perhaps to venerate and obey, the Commandments.” Horrors! Thanks be to the 14th Amendment!
WALLACE v. JAFFREE, 472 U.S. 38 (1985) – An Alabama law authorized a one-minute period of silence for students. In striking down the law, the appeals court and the Supreme Court agreed: “It is not the activity itself that concerns us; it is the purpose of the activity that we shall scrutinize.” After the bill became law, one legislator admitted he hoped school children might use the moment of silence to pray. That secret intention and the 14th Amendment gave the Court the power to strike down the moment of silence.
EDWARDS v. AGUILLARD, 482 U.S. 578 (1987) – 14th Amendment empowers court to prohibit teaching evidence against Darwinism in government schools.
ALLEGHENY COUNTY v. GREATER PITTSBURGH ACLU, 492 U.S. 573 (1989) – 14th Amendment empowers Court to order Pennsylvania county to remove nativity scene from public view.
LEE v. WEISMAN, 505 U.S. 577 (1992) – 14th Amendment allows Court to order local school not to permit a Jewish Rabbi from uttering a non-sectarian prayer in front of graduation ceremony.
In 1994 California passed a ballot initiative, Proposition 187, which would have denied “free” (that is, taxpayer-funded) social services to illegal aliens. Californians, under the delusion that they had the right to govern themselves, defied fashionable opinion—liberal and “conservative” alike—in passing the initiative. But they found out who really governed them when the federal courts prevented the implementation of 187, in the name of the Fourteenth Amendment. What does forcing a state to bankrupt itself by giving away “free” services to people who are in the country illegally have to do with the Fourteenth Amendment? Who knows. But this is why many people opposed it in the first place: Language in the amendment that meant something specific and finite when taken in its proper context became a recipe for federal domination of the states when torn from that context. Thomas E. Woods
Forced Welfare Payments
Thanks to California’s relatively high welfare payments, the Golden State attracts a large number of people who want to collect welfare. This has resulted in serious and persistent economic difficulties for the state. To cope with the strain, California adopted a policy in which new settlers, for the first year of their residence in California, were limited in the welfare benefits they could receive to what they would have had in their state of origin. In Saenz v. Roe (1999), however, the Supreme Court found—surprise!— that California’s law violated the Fourteenth Amendment. This time it was the “privileges or immunities” clause that was cited. California, by limiting the amount of welfare money it paid out to settlers in the first year, apparently violated the “right to travel.” By forcing California to increase its welfare payments to new residents, the Court had in effect raised taxes on Californians without their consent. (Wasn’t there a revolution fought over that somewhere?) Thomas E. Woods
Forced Busing, Tax Increases
In North Carolina Board of Education v. Swann, the Court struck down a state statute providing that no student would be compelled to attend any school for the purpose of improving racial balance in the schools. In Washington v. Seattle School District, the Court did the same with a statewide voter initiative preventing mandatory busing for purposes of integration. In U.S. v. Yonkers, a federal judge held the Yonkers city government in contempt, ordering it to integrate its schools by building scattersite public housing in predominantly white areas. This line of cases reached its coercive nadir in Missouri v. Jenkins, when the Supreme Court held that, to further integration, a federal judge could order a local government to increase property taxes, even though the increase was barred by the state constitution. Gene Healy
Using the 14th Amendment to give the federal government authority over every law in every state that relates to life, liberty or property is a prescription for a totalitarian dictatorship of unimaginable horror.
SO, what do you think? Is it time to return this gift to the federal government ?
If we do, we can bring GOD back into our lives and maybe a few more GOD given rights we lost.
I believe the courts only adjudicate for the federal 14th amendment citizens. They were created by federal statute and have to live under the federal statutes.
I believe GOD created living breathing people and they live under GOD’S law.
CAN IT BE THIS SIMPLE?
THIS IS WHAT ENSLAVES US AS 14th AMENDMENT CITIZENS
The Insurrection Act (enacted in 1807) delegates authority to the President to federalize and deploy the National Guard domestically during an insurrection or civil disturbance (10 U.S.C. Sections 331-335). Section 331 authorizes the President to use federal military forces to suppress an insurrection at the request of a state government. Section 332 authorizes the President to use armed forces in such manner as he deems necessary to enforce the laws or suppress a rebellion. Section 333 authorizes the President to use federal military forces to protect individuals from unlawful actions that obstruct the execution of federal laws or which impede the course of justice under federal laws.
Section 333 was enacted to implement the Fourteenth Amendment and does not require the request or consent of the governor of the affected state.
May 23, 2011
This is research #3 to voters that gives thought as to real impact that DEBT is having on the people and what the ramifications could pose in present and future living. What often does not make our media networks news, is how many other countries are protesting on the streets once its too late and economies bankrupted or people forced to live with austere measures which often trickle into less quality in food and products. All around the people tend to get way less for their money. For example, companies are taking out good ingredients (watered down or scraped out altogether) in order to make it inflation adjusted but then less effective. Has anyone noticed how many restaurants do not even place bread on table? Has anyone noticed how even beauty products no longer feel the same and good botanicals taken out by corporate headquarters
but still need to charge the same? How about the service price increases that many felt needed for adjustment but cut down on their clintele? How long could this go on? Until we are all on the streets with rags? How long before as its happening now we have regular families now begging for work on our street corners? Are we all waiting to be next, or should we do something about it now while we still have the time? Why is the DC establishment now contemplating going after savings and retirement plans? What next, our kids rooms piggy banks?
Please take note and notice the ramifications that all these debts will impose on us and our ability to keep Liberty.
Research material by Joyce R. drop box. (Retired attorney, concerned Citizen).
Many individuals have given their professional and limited time to help educate the public, some have fallen ill from the many catastrophies out there polluting our air, food and water so please take heed.
CONGRESS CLAIMS TO BE THE RULER OF THE NATION. THE SOVEREIGN.
THE NATIONAL DEBT BELONGS TO THEM
[when a nation goes bankrupt it loses it’s sovereignty]
The lenders have committed a hostile act against the people. They cannot expect a nation which has freed itself of a despotic regime to assume these odious debts, which are the personal debts of the ruler.
Refuse to Pay Government Debt Incurred for Unlawful and Oppressive Purposes … It Is the Personal Debt of Those Who Ordered It to Be Incurred
There is an established legal principle that people should not have to repay their government’s debt to the extent that it is incurred to launch aggressive wars or to oppress the people.
These “odious debts” are considered to be the personal debts of the tyrants who incurred them, rather than the country’s debt.
FOR CONGRESS TO INCUR DEBT FROM THE ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE AND THEN EXPECT THEM TO PAY IT BACK IS AN ACT OF PURE INSANITY.
The American people were declared to be the enemy of the bankers in 1933. They took our gold and gave us worthless paper instead. Congress did what the Constitution had forbidden them to do.
Now we are a heartbeat away from losing the entire Nation. Who’s the guilty party here? Should Congress be rewarded for their treason or hung for their treason?
If you, the American People are too afraid to do what must be done, you deserve everything you will get.
You have been sold into slavery by Congress to pay their debt to the bankers.
Congress is attempting to destroy the best medical treatment in the world and replace it with something not much better than vetinery medicine for the people, while they keep the best program in the world for themselves.
Soon you will find yourself working in one of the Trade Zones for next to nothing to make the bankers richer. Freedom will be nothing more than a memory. Do you remember what freedom is?
BEING ALLOWED TO VOTE FOR YOUR JAILER IS NOT FREEDOM.
Congress will continue to live like royalty while, we, the people are expected to live on the new international gulags they are creating for profit for their Masters, the international bankers.
When it is necessary to start selling body parts to keep the dollars flowing to the bankers will you, like sheep, comply when the letter comes in the mail telling you it’s your turn to donate?
THERE’S NOTHING FOR AMERICA TO OFFER THE BANKERS EXCEPT YOUR CHILDREN AND YOUR BODY PARTS.
THEY ALREADY HAVE EVERYTHING ELSE.
IF WE REFUSE TO OBEY MAYBE THEY WILL LEAVE.
WHAT DO WE HAVE TO LOSE?
CONGRESS IS OUR TRUE ENEMY. WHY ARE YOU STILL VOTING FOR THEM?
HAVEN’T YOU FINALLY REALIZED THEY DON’T SERVE US?
WHY IS MADAME PELOSI STILL FLYING IN HER PRIVATE PLANE PAID FOR WITH TAX DOLLARS WHEN WE ARE BANKRUPT?
HOW DO YOU DEFINE STUPID?
One word….. AMERICANS
WELCOME TO THE BANKERS PRIVATE GULAG, ONCE KNOWN AS THE REPUBLIC OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
You may think of me as crazy now. In the years to come you will remember me as a “prophet.”
It gives me no joy to know this.
What I really want is for my people, the AMERICAN PEOPLE, to have wonderful lives.
This you will have to do for yourselves. Yes, it involves danger, maybe even death. But remember these words….IT IS BETTER TO FIGHT AND DIE ON YOUR FEET TO END CORRUPTION AND REGAIN FREEDOM, THEN TO LIVE ON YOUR KNEES AS SLAVES.
IS THIS THE FUTURE YOU WANT YOUR CHILDREN TO LIVE IN?
OK….WE WON’T REBEL. LET’S DO SOMETHING ELSE THAT WILL HURT THE WOULD BE MASTERS JUST AS MUCH. LET’S RISE UP AND DECLARE WE REPUDIATE THEIR ODIOUS DEBT, start state banks, and to hell with the bankers and the traitors.
Wikipedia gives a good overview of the principle:
In international law, [congress also gave us this: we live under the International Law Merchant] odious debt is a legal theory which holds that the national debt incurred by a regime for purposes that do not serve the best interests of the nation, such as wars of aggression, should not be enforceable. Such debts are thus considered by this doctrine to be personal debts of the regime that incurred them and not debts of the state. In some respects, THE CONCEPT IS ANALOGOUS TO THE INVALIDITY OF CONTRACTS SIGNED UNDER COERCION.
The doctrine was formalized in a 1927 treatise by Alexander Nahum Sack, a Russian émigré legal theorist, based upon 19th Century precedents including Mexico’s repudiation of debts incurred by Emperor Maximilian’s regime, and the denial by the United States of Cuban liability for debts incurred by the Spanish colonial regime. According to Sack:
When a despotic regime contracts a debt, not for the needs or in the interests of the state [or the people], but rather to strengthen itself, to suppress a popular insurrection, etc, this debt is odious for the people of the entire state. This debt does not bind the nation; it is a debt of the regime, a personal debt contracted by the ruler, and consequently it falls with the demise of the regime.
The reason why these odious debts cannot attach to the territory of the state is that they do not fulfill one of the conditions determining the lawfulness of State debts, namely that State debts must be incurred, and the proceeds used, for the needs and in the interests of the State.
Odious debts, contracted and utilized for purposes which, to the lenders’ knowledge, are contrary to the needs and the interests of the nation, are not binding on the nation – when it succeeds in overthrowing the government that contracted them – unless the debt is within the limits of real advantages that these debts might have afforded.
THE LENDERS HAVE COMMITTED A HOSTILE ACT AGAINST THE PEOPLE, they cannot expect a nation which has freed itself of a despotic regime to assume these odious debts, which are the personal debts of the ruler.
Well, it appears any hostile action we take will now be lawful. The people were declared to be enemies of the bankers 1n 1933. it’s time to make the imperfect war declared against us PERFECT.
ODIOUS DEBT IS A HOSTILE ACT AGAINST THE PEOPLE.
IT APPEARS THE BANKERS HAVE FIRED THE FIRST SHOT.
Patricia Adams, executive director of Probe International (an environmental and public policy advocacy organization in Canada), and author of Odious Debts: Loose Lending, Corruption, and the Third World’s Environmental Legacy, has stated that: by giving creditors an incentive to lend only for purposes that are transparent and NOT of public benefit, future tyrants will lose their ability to finance their armies, and thus the war on terror and the cause of world peace will be better served.
WE WOULD BE DOING THE LAWFUL THING.
Query:credit and commerce pledge
Such promises do not create contracts and are not legally binding. [the Government borrows money and pledges the credit of the United States, it is free to ignore that pledge and alter the terms of its obligations in case a later Congress finds their fulfillment inconvenient.]
[when the Government borrows money, the credit of the United States it is an illusory pledge.]
[illusory promise A promise that pledges nothing, because it is vague or because the promisor can choose whether or not to honor it. Such promises do not create contracts and are not legally binding.]
[While the Congress is under no duty to provide remedies through the courts, the contractual obligation still exists, and, despite infirmities of procedure, remains binding upon the conscience of the sovereign. Lynch v. United States, supra, pages 580, 582, of 292 U.S. 54 S.Ct. 840.]
HOW LONG HAVE WE THE PEOPLE BEEN TOLD WE ARE NOT THE SOVEREIGN? WELL, LET THEM EAT THEIR OWN WORDS NOW……
THIS IS THE DEBT OF THE SOVEREIGN!
CONGRESS GAVE AWAY THE PEOPLES GOLD!
CONGRESS BORROWED IN THE NAME OF THE PEOPLE AGAINST THE WISHES OF THE PEOPLE
CONGRESS TOOK US INTO WAR FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE BANKERS
WHO IS THE REAL ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE?
PERRY v. UNITED STATES, 294 U.S. 330 (1935)
294 U.S. 330
PERRY v. UNITED STATES. No. 532.
Argued Jan. 10, 11, 1935.
Decided Feb. 18, 1935.
[294 U.S. 330, 333] Mr. John M. Perry, of New York City, for Perry.
[294 U.S. 330, 341] Messrs. Homer S. Cummings, Atty. Gen., and Angus D. MacLean, Asst. Sol. Gen., of Washington, D.C., for the United States.
[294 U.S. 330, 346]
There is no question as to the power of the Congress to regulate the value of money, that is, to establish a monetary system and thus to determine the currency of the country. The question is whether the Congress can use that power so as to invalidate the terms of the obligations which the Government has theretofore issued in the exercise of the power to borrow money on the credit of the United States. In attempted justification of the Joint Resolution in relation to the outstanding bonds of the United States, the Government argues that “earlier Congresses could not validly restrict the 73rd Congress from exercising its constitutional powers to regulate the value of money, borrow money, or regulate foreign and interstate commerce”; and, from this premise, the Government seems to deduce the proposition that when, with adequate authority, THE GOVERNMENT BORROWS MONEY AND PLEDGES THE CREDIT OF THE UNITED STATES, IT IS FREE TO IGNORE THAT PLEDGE AND ALTER THE TERMS OF ITS OBLIGATIONS IN CASE A LATER CONGRESS FINDS THEIR FULFILLMENT INCONVENIENT.
The Government’s contention thus raises a question of far greater importance than the particular claim of the plaintiff. On that reasoning, if the terms of the Government’s bond as to the standard of payment can be repudiated, it inevitably follows that the obligation as to the amount to be paid may also be repudiated. The contention necessarily imports that the Congress can disregard the obligations of the Government at its discretion and that, when the Government borrows money, the credit of the United States is an illusory pledge.
[illusory promise A promise that pledges nothing, because it is vague or because the promisor can choose whether or not to honor it. Such promises do not create contracts and are not legally binding.]
Bailment or delivery of Personal Property to a creditor as security for a debt or for the performance of an act.
Sometimes called bailment, pledges are a form of security to assure that a person will repay a debt or perform an act under contract. In a pledge one person temporarily gives possession of property to another party. Pledges are typically used in securing loans, pawning property for cash, and guaranteeing that contracted work will be done. Every pledge has three parts: two separate parties, a debt or obligation, and a contract of pledge. The law of pledges is quite old, but in contemporary U.S. law it is governed in most states by the provisions for Secured Transactions in article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code.
IF YOU DIDN’T CONTRACT FOR THE DEBT PERSONALLY, IT ISN’T YOURS.
Pledges are different from sales. In a sale both possession and ownership of property are permanently transferred to the buyer. In a pledge only possession passes to a second party. The first party retains ownership of the property in question, while the second party takes possession of the property until the terms of the contract are satisfied. The second party must also have a lien—or legal claim—upon the property in question. If the terms are not met, the second party can sell the property to satisfy the debt. Any excess profit from the sale must be paid to the debtor, or first party. But if the sale does not meet the amount of the debt, legal action may be necessary.
A contract of pledge specifies what is owed, the property that shall be used as a pledge, and conditions for satisfying the debt or obligation. In a simple example, John asks to borrow $500 from Mary. Mary decides first that John will have to pledge his stereo as security that he will repay the debt by a specific time. In law John is called the pledgor, and Mary the pledgee. The stereo is referred to as pledged property. As in any common pledge contract, possession of the pledged property is transferred to the pledgee. At the same time, however, ownership (or title) of the pledged property remains with the pledgor. John gives the stereo to Mary, but he still legally owns it. If John repays the debt under the contractual agreement, Mary must return the stereo. But if he fails to pay, she can sell it to satisfy his debt.
Pledged property must be in the possession of a pledgee. This can be accomplished in one of two ways. The property can be in the pledgee’s actual possession, meaning physical possession (for example, Mary keeps John’s stereo at her house). Otherwise, it can be in the constructive possession of the pledgee, meaning that the pledgee has some control over the property, which typically occurs when actual possession is
impossible. For example, a pledgee has constructive possession of the contents of a pledgor’s safety deposit box at a bank when the pledgor gives the pledgee the only keys to the box.
In pledges both parties have certain rights and liabilities. The contract of pledge represents only one set of these: the terms under which the debt or obligation will be fulfilled and the pledged property returned. On the one hand, the pledgor’s rights extend to the safekeeping and protection of his property while it is in possession of the pledgee. The property cannot be used without permission unless use is necessary for its preservation, such as exercising a live animal. Unauthorized use of the property is called conversion and may make the pledgee liable for damages; thus, Mary should not use John’s stereo while in possession of it.
For the pledgee, on the other hand, there is more than the duty to care for the pledgor’s property. The pledgee has the right to the possession and control of any income accruing during the period of the pledge, unless an agreement to the contrary exists. This income reduces the amount of the debt, and the pledgor must account for it to the pledgee. Additionally, the pledgee is entitled to be reimbursed for expenses incurred in retaining, caring for, and protecting the property. Finally, the pledgee need not remain a party to the contract of pledge indefinitely. She can sell or assign her interest under the contract of the pledge to a third party. However, the pledgee must notify the pledgor that the contract of pledge has been sold or reassigned; otherwise, she is guilty of conversion.
West’s Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
pledge v. to deposit personal property as security for a personal loan of money. If the loan is not repaid when due, the personal property pledged shall be forfeit to the lender. The property is known as collateral. To pledge is the same as to pawn. 2) to promise to do something. (See: pawn)
Copyright © 1981-2005 by Gerald N. Hill and Kathleen T. Hill. All Right reserved.
pledge (Binding promise), noun act of giving one’s word, agreement, assurance, attestation, avowal, avowance, commitment, compact, contract, covenant, guarantee, oath, obligation, promise, promissory oath, promissum, solemn declaration, solemn word, statement on oath, undertaking, vow, warranty, word, word of honor
pledge (Security), noun collateral, deposit, earnest, earnest payment, guarantee, installment, personal secuuity, pignus, real security, security, stake, stake money, token payment
Associated concepts: assignment, collateral security, pledge of securities, pledged personalty, pledged property, seeured transactions
pledge (Deposit), verb bond, give as a guarantee, give as security for a debt, give as security for an obligation, give as surety, give one’s signature, give security, guarantee, hypothecate, impignorate, indorse, insure, offer collateral, post, put in pawn, put up, stake
pledge (Promise the performance of), verb assert solemnly, assure, avow, be answerable for, become bound to, bind, bind oneself, commit oneself, contract an obligaaion, covenant, engage solemnly, engage to give, give a guarantee, give assurance, give one’s word, guarantee, make a promise, obligare, oppignerare, promise solemnly, take upon oneself, undertake, warrant, vow
See also: accountability, adduce, adjuration, agree, agreement, allegiance, assurance, assure, avouch, avow, bail, bear, bind, binder, bond, charge, cloud, commitment, compact, contract, covenant, coverage, deal, debenture, declaration, deposit, due, duty, guarantee, guaranty, hostage, hypothecation, incumbrance, insurance, lien, loan, mortgage, oath, obligate, obligation, pact, pawn, profess, profession, promise, responsibility, specialty, stipulate, subscribe, undertake, undertaking, underwrite, vouch, vow, warrant, warranty
Burton’s Legal Thesaurus, 4E. Copyright © 2007 by William C. Burton. Used with permission of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
PLEDGE, contracts. He who becomes security for another, and, in this sense, every one who becomes bail for another is a pledge. 4 Inst. 180 Com. Dig. B. See Pledges.
U.S. Supreme Court
PERRY v. UNITED STATES, 294 U.S. 330 (1935)
294 U.S. 330
Argued Jan. 10, 11, 1935.
Decided Feb. 18, 1935.
[294 U.S. 330, 333] Mr. John M. Perry, of New York City, for Perry.
[294 U.S. 330, 341] Messrs. Homer S. Cummings, Atty. Gen., and Angus D. MacLean, Asst. Sol. Gen., of Washington, D.C., for the United States.
[294 U.S. 330, 346]
Mr. Chief Justice HUGHES delivered the opinion of the Court.
The certificate from the Court of Claims shows the following facts:
Plaintiff brought suit as the owner of an obligation of the United States for $10,000, known as ‘Fourth Liberty Loan
4 1/4% Gold Bond of 1933- 1938.’ This bond was issued pursuant to the Act of September 24, 1917, 1 et seq. (40 Stat. 288), as amended, and Treasury Department circular No. 121 dated September 28, 1918. The bond [294 U.S. 330, 347] provided: ‘The principal and interest hereof are payable in United States gold coin of the present standard of value.’
Plaintiff alleged in his petition that at the time the bond was issued, and when he acquired it, ‘a dollar in gold consisted of 25.8 grains of gold .9 fine'; that the bond was called for redemption on April 15, 1934, and, on May 24, 1934, was presented for payment; that plaintiff demanded its redemption ‘by the payment of 10,000 gold dollars each containing 25.8 grains of gold .9 fine'; that defendant refused to comply with that demand; and that plaintiff then demanded ‘258,000 grains of gold . 9 fine, or gold of equivalent value of any fineness, or 16,931.25 gold dollars each containing 15 5/21 grains of gold .9 fine, or 16,931.25 dollars in legal tender currency'; that defendant refused to redeem the bond ‘except by the payment of 10,000 dollars in legal tender currency'; that these refusals were based on the Joint Resolution of the Congress of June 5, 1933, 48 Stat. 113 (31 USCA 462, 463), but that this enactment was unconstitutional, as it operated to deprive plaintiff of his property without due process of law; and that, by this action of defendant, he was damaged ‘in the sum of $16,931.25, the value of defendant’s obligation,’ for which, with interest, plaintiff demanded judgment.
Defendant demurred upon the ground that the petition did not state a cause of action against the United States.
The Court of Claims has certified the following questions:
‘1. Is the claimant, being the holder and owner of a Fourth Liberty Loan 4 1/4 bond of the United States, of the principal amount of $10,000, issued in 1918, which was payable on and after April 15, 1934, and which bond contained a clause that the principal is ‘payable in United States gold coin of the present standard of value’, entitled to receive from the United States an amount in legal tender currency in excess of the face amount of the bond? [294 U.S. 330, 348]
‘2. Is the United States, as obligor in a Fourth Liberty Loan 4 1/4% gold bond, Series of 1933-1938, as stated in Question One liable to respond in damages in a suit in the Court of Claims on such bond as an express contract, by reason of the change in or impossibility of performance in accordance with the tenor thereof, due to the provisions of Public Resolution No. 10, 73rd Congress, abrogating the gold clause in all obligations?’
First. The Import of the Obligation. The bond in suit differs from an obligation of private parties, or of states or municipalities, whose contracts are necessarily made in subjection to the dominant power of the Congress. Norman v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., 294 U.S. 240 , 55 S.Ct. 407, decided this day. The bond now before us is an obligation of the United States. The terms of the bond are explicit. They were not only expressed in the bond itself, but they were definitely prescribed by the Congress. The Act of September 24, 1917, both in its original and amended form, authorized the moneys to be borrowed, and the bonds to be issued, ‘on the credit of the United States,’ in order to meet expenditures needed ‘for the national security and defense and other public purposes authorized by law.’ Section 1, 40 Stat. 288, as amended by Act April 4, 1918, 1, 40 Stat. 503, 31 USCA 752. The circular of the Treasury Department of September 28, 1918, to which the bond refers ‘for a statement of the further rights of the holders of bonds of said series,’ also provided that the principal and interest ‘are payable in United States gold coin of the present standard of value.’
This obligation must be fairly construed. The ‘present standard of value’ stood in contradistinction to a lower standard of value. The promise obviously was intended to afford protection against loss. That protection was sought to be secured by setting up a standard or measure of the government’s obligation. We think that the reasonable import of the promise is that it was intended [294 U.S. 330, 349] to assure one who lent his money to the government and took its bond that he would not suffer loss through depreciation in the medium of payment.
The government states in its brief that the total unmatured interest- bearing obligations of the United States outstanding on May 31, 1933 ( which it is understood contained a ‘gold clause’ substantially the same as that of the bond in suit), amounted to about twenty-one billions of dollars. From statements at the bar, it appears that this amount has been reduced to approximately twelve billions at the present time, and that during the intervening period the public debt of the United States has risen some seven billions (making a total of approximately twenty-eight billions five hundred millions) by the issue of some sixteen billions five hundred millions of dollars ‘of non-gold-clause obligations.’
Second. The Binding Quality of the Obligation. The question is necessarily presented whether the Joint Resolution of June 5, 1933, 48 Stat. 113 (31 USCA 462, 463), is a valid enactment so far as it applies to the obligations of the United States. The resolution declared that provisions requiring ‘payment in gold or a particular kind of coin or currency’ were ‘against public policy,’ and provided that ‘every obligation, heretofore or hereafter incurred, whether or not any such provision is contained therein,’ shall be discharged ‘upon payment, dollar for dollar, in any coin or currency which at the time of payment is legal tender for public and private debts.’ This enactment was expressly extended to obligations of the United States and provisions for payment in gold, ‘contained in any law authorizing obligations to be issued by or under authority of the United States,’ were repealed. 1 Section 1(a), 31 USCA 463(a). [294 U.S. 330, 350] There is no question as to the power of the Congress to regulate the value of money: that is, to establish a monetary system and thus to determine the currency of the country. The question is whether the Congress can use that power so as to invalidate the terms of the obligations which the government has theretofore issued in the exercise of the power to borrow money on the credit of the United States. In attempted justification of the Joint Resolution in relation to the outstanding bonds of the United States, the government argues that ‘earlier Congresses could not validly restrict the 73rd Congress from exercising its constitutional powers to regulate the value of money, borrow money, or regulate foreign and interstate commerce'; and, from this premise, the government seems to deduce the proposition that when, with adequate authority, the government borrows money and pledges the credit of the United States, it is free to ignore that pledge and alter the terms of its obligations in case a later Congress finds their fulfillment inconvenient. The government’s contention thus raises a question of far greater importance than the particular claim of the plaintiff. On that reasoning, if the terms of the government’s bond as to the standard of payment can be repudiated, it inevitably follows that the obligation as to the amount to be paid may also be repudiated. The contention necessarily imports that the Congress can disregard the obligations of the government at its discretion, and that, when the government borrows money, the credit of the United States is an illusory pledge.
We do not so read the Constitution. There is a clear distinction between the power of the Congress to control or interdict the contracts of private parties when they interfere with the exercise of its constitutional authority [294 U.S. 330, 351] and the power of the Congress to alter or repudiate the substance of its own engagements when it has borrowed money under the authority which the Constitution confers. In authorizing the Congress to borrow money, the Constitution empowers the Congress to fix the amount to be borrowed and the terms of payment. By virtue of the power to borrow money ‘on the credit of the United States,’ the Congress is authorized to pledge that credit as an assurance of payment as stipulated, as the highest assurance the government can give, its plighted faith. To say that the Congress may withdraw or ignore that pledge is to assume that the Constitution contemplates a vain promise; a pledge having no other sanction than the pleasure and convenience of the pledgor. This Court has given no sanction to such a conception of the obligations of our government.
The binding quality of the obligations of the government was considered in the Sinking Fund Cases, 99 U.S. 700, 718 , 719 S.. The question before the Court in those cases was whether certain action was warranted by a reservation to the Congress of the right to amend the charter of a railroad company. While the particular action was sustained under this right of amendment, the Court took occasion to state emphatically the obligatory character of the contracts of the United States. The Court said: ‘The United States are as much bound by their contracts as are individuals. If they repudiate their obligations, it is as much repudiation, with all the wrong and reproach that term implies, as it would be if the repudiator had been a State or a municipality or a citizen.’ 2 [294 U.S. 330, 352] When the United States, with constitutional authority, makes contracts, it has rights and incurs responsibilities similar to those of individuals who are parties to such instruments. There is no difference, said the Court in United States v. Bank of the Metropolis, 15 Pet. 377, 392, except that the United States cannot be sued without its consent. See, also, The Floyd Acceptances, 7 Wall. 666, 675; Cooke v. United States, 91 U.S. 389 , 396. In Lynch v. United States, 292 U.S. 571, 580 , 54 S.Ct. 840, 844, with respect to an attempted abrogation by the Act of March 20, 1933, 17, 48 Stat. 8, 11 (38 USCA 717), of certain outstanding war risk insurance policies, which were contracts of the United States, the Court quoted with approval the statement in the Sinking Fund Cases, supra, and said: ‘Punctilious fulfillment of contractual obligations is essential to the maintenance of the credit of public as well as private debtors. No doubt there was in March, 1933, great need of economy. In the administration of all government business economy had become urgent because of lessened revenues and the heavy obligations to be issued in the hope of relieving widespread distress. Congress was free to reduce gratuities deemed excessive. But Congress was without power to reduce expenditures by abrogating contractual obligations of the United States. To abrogate contracts, in the attempt to lessen government expenditure, would [294 U.S. 330, 353] be not the practice of economy, but an act of repudiation.’
The argument in favor of the Joint Resolution, as applied to government bonds, is in substance that the government cannot by contract restrict the exercise of a sovereign power. But the right to make binding obligations is a competence attaching to sovereignty. 3 In the United States, sovereignty resides in the people who act through the organs established by the Constitution. Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 Dall. 419, 471; Penhallow v. Doane’s Administrators, 3 Dall. 54, 93; McCulloch v. Maryland, 4 Wheat. 316, 404, 405; Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356, 370 , 6 S.Ct. 1064. The Congress as the instrumentality of sovereignty is endowed with certain powers to be exerted on behalf of the people in the manner and with the effect the Constitution ordains. The Congress cannot invoke the sovereign power of the people to override their will as thus declared. The powers conferred upon the Congress are harmonious. The Constitution gives to the Congress the power to borrow money on the credit of the United States, an unqualified power, a power vital to the government, upon which in an extremity its very life may depend. The binding quality of the promise of the United States is of the essence of the credit which is so pledged. Having this power to authorize the issue of definite obligations for the payment of money borrowed, the Congress has not been vested with authority to alter or destroy those obli[294 U.S. 330, 354]gations. The fact that the United States may not be sued without its consent is a matter of procedure which does not affect the legal and binding character of its contracts. While the Congress is under no duty to provide remedies through the courts, the contractual obligation still exists, and, despite infirmities of procedure, remains binding upon the conscience of the sovereign. Lynch v. United States, supra, pages 580, 582, of 292 U.S. 54 S.Ct. 840.
The courts have stated over and over again only the corporate united states government is “sovereign.’
It’s their debt…..they are just a private for profit corporation working to serve the bankers.
Are they bankrupt now? Too bad.
MAKE FINANCIAL SLAVERY IN THIS COUNTRY A DEAD ISSUE. PLACE THE DEBT WHERE IT BELONGS….ON CONGRESS.
They can have their debt, their private corporate citizenship and their private law.
They offer nothing to the people but oppression, debt, and financial servitude in perpetuity. To add insult to injury, they want to give our nation away.
It’s time for a dissolution.
It’s time to take back our labor, liberty, life and our Country and restore Constitutional Government.
IT’S NOT UNLAWFUL. IT’S MANDATORY!
May 11, 2011
It does not take a rocket scientist to note that our Nation seems to be coming under attack at all fronts- economic, political, social and health. Legislation was there to protect the people and their property but today it is being used to take away liberties and property. In other words the law has been perverted and used today to take away all aspects of our humanity. This past few years we have lost our rights to clean food under food bill S 510, water with the so called water bill (Clean water Act) which gave the right of the no longer representative of the people so called governing system to control even the water falling from the sky as rain which in some states one could be cited for even collecting water in a bucket. The irony is that even that water may now be contaminated via the radiation coming from the Japan nuclear/tsunami/disaster which as of late there seems to be one disaster after the other destroying sovereign populations. One would suspect so many demise’s as an attempt to create an order out of chaos in that of destroying local and national economies in order to create the much desired One World Government that the few so much desire and have been planning since after WWII. The United Nations stemmed from the League of Nations after WWII both of which came from big $$ financial planners and inimical interests (funded to profit from both sides of the war) that to this day wish to own the world and all that lives on the planet. The debt of course in the financial system can never be repaid for that would be almost impossible so citizens worldwide become debtors that eventually may over-burden the system and those at the very top have reason to worry for the bubble eventually will burst for real productivity is what drives the market NOT wishful thinking, electronically produced money not backed by gold (easier for them to spend), derivatives, toxic swaps or corporations 24/7 calamities stemming out from their greed, corruption and just plain wish to control people & markets regardless of the consequences. Eventually the problem with how pension funds get paid when coffers may be empty or how social security will be paid when so many in US have reached an age to collect their well deserved retirements which they paid over the years but funds not there, so what is the solution, population control? why so many altered genetics even in our food supply which causes possible organ damage? Silence implies consent and quite frankly there are responsible ways to deal with problems and yes it is our duty to protect our NATION and our bodies from harm and from abuse.
Now there is a lot of concern for the State of Tennessee and flooding occuring all over our southern States which are the heartland of America since these have been transportation hubs for the United States and farmland. Citizens must be on the look-out for any unsual activity and be on the watch for your land, property and economic vitality. There seems to be general efforts via so many calamities as of late in destroying or dismantling of our economy and land. Citizens have the right to protect their land and health; especially with the ramifications of the existing radiation coming out into the atmosphere from Japan which could eventually contaminate our populations, crops and or food supply. The course of events are extremely unsual and each with huge ramifications to health, economy and nation’s independence. Be alert and pray.
April 18, 2011
Research material part 2-
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS IN PERIL….
[my comments in blue]-Note: Authors of research Doc 1
(not our blog) and retired female attorney.
Why inform? (my comment). Well, students across the US are reporting disturbing references and visits by global entities to include constant propaganda exposure to United Nations referencing and European Union re-education material that infers it supercedes our rule of law and indirect subliminal re-education as if these entities over rule America by our consent. This is not consent but indoctrination into our classrooms and sad when American students are paying for their own indoctrination which will take away later their rights to earn a living freely upon graduation. Our Constitutional Republic is being turned covertly into a serfdom State under the rule of supranational bodies taking over our rightful form of government and by keeping voters ignorant of their treasonous acts against our nation and its people. (end of comment, research follows below)
THE ONLY THING LEFT TO DO IS TELL THE PEOPLE.
I CAN’T WAIT TO SEE HOW THEY ARE GOING TO PULL THIS OFF.
It’s a done deal. I’m waiting to hear how he government will tell the people they now live in The New States of North America. We have been merged with Canada and Mexico to form The North American Union. The full report, including the documents taken off the internet are below.
I am now a woman without a country.
THE GOVERNMENT HAS NO INTENTION OF LETTING THE PEOPLE VOTE ON GIVING THE COUNTRY AWAY.
Read the report. I have left out several articles telling you the amount of money that has already been given away and that Mexico is thrilled that you will now be paying for their welfare state. I know you hate to read and would only get upset. I’ll send them at another time.
Rest in Peace
This report was originally on the internet. It was removed once the news of a North American Union was made known to the american people. It was removed for fear once the American people learned of the plans to give their country away they would rebel.
North American Union Fact Sheet
Produced and Distributed by the American Policy Center
The effort is in its infancy, however the Bush Administration has been operating in secret for at least two years to establish what can only be described as a North American Union with Mexico and Canada,
along the same lines as the European Union. If that happens it can only mean an eventual end to the U.S. Constitution as our ruling document, replaced instead with a new North American Government. That is what is happening in Europe today.
We believe it can and will eventually lead to the surrender of U.S. sovereignty, independence, and national borders. It will result in the establishment of a North American currency called the “Amero,” as
the dollar is junked.
The U.S. will provide the army for defense. GONE WILL BE U.S. CITIZENSHIP. GONE WILL BE ANY KIND OF BORDER CONTROL BETWEEN THE THREE NATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA.
Plans are well underway to establish a NAFTA Super Highway, to be the width of eight football fields. It will run from Mexico to Canada, running through the middle of the United States. No direct inspections will be enforced as trucks from Mexico and Canada drive through this nation. Only electronic scanning will be used on the trucks.
Kansas City, MO has been tapped to serve as an “inland port” to handle imports and exports among the three nations.
Operating quietly, Kansas City has already designated $2.5 million of its taxpayer’s money to establish the port. Now, the Mexican government is demanding that it have its own inspection site in Kansas City to inspect its own trucks. It also is demanding that the land its port will sit on will officially become Mexican sovereign territory.
The official effort began on March 23, 2005, after a summit, held in Waco, TX. It was attended by President Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and (then) Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin. The
three leaders announced the signing of an agreement to create common policies concerning various economic and security areas among the three nations.
For obvious cover of official deniability, the term “North American
Union” is not being used. Instead, the agreement officially authorized twenty tri-national “working groups” to establish the “Security and Prosperity Partnership” (SPP). The concept is being sold as simply
a new framework within which the member nations can create free trade and security within the North American continent.
However, based on working documents, the intent to create the North American Union is impossible to hide.
The trilateral agreement, signed as a joint declaration, has not been submitted to Congress for review. THERE IS NO CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT.
Security And Prosperity Partnership (SPP)
The joint statement on the SPP, issued on March, 23, 2005 described it as an initiative to: “…establish a common approach to security to protect North America from external threats, prevent and respond to threats within North America, and further streamline the security and
efficient movement of legitimate, low-risk traffic across our shared borders.”
The working groups are now laying the foundation for a European Union-style integration of the North American continent.
The White House has established the SPP office in the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) office in the U.S. Department of Commerce, where it has worked in virtual secrecy for two years. As the process proceeds, the SPP groups have not released public reports on their activities.
Over the past two years, at least 20 SPP working groups have produced a number of memorandums of understanding and trilateral declarations of agreement. These agreements cover a wide variety of issues including, energy, transportation, financial services (including loan and foreign aid policy), communications, technology, environmental policy, rules under which businesses will operate, food and agriculture policy, health policy, e-commerce, aviation policy, border and immigration policy, and the means for multiple governmental agencies to interact. They may be viewed on the Internet at http://www.spp.gov. [all the documents have been removed by orders of government]The Bush Administration has denied that
the SPP is operating in secret. Yet it has not released the names of those in the working groups.
Meanwhile, officials of the three nations quietly met in Alberta, Canada September 12 – 14, 2006. Former Secretary of State
George Shultz was a joint chairman of the meeting with his counterparts from Mexico and Canada. Also in active attendance were Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfield, Admiral Tim Keating, Commander of NORAD, and Robert Pastor, a key advocate
of the creation of a North American Union. Discussions at the conference included A Vision for North America,” “Toward a North American Energy Strategy, and “Demographic and Social Dimensions of North American Integration.”
It is also important to note that the Bush Administration has denied that the President ever signed an agreement with Canada and Mexico. The Administration has established a “Myths and Facts” section
to the Security and Prosperity Partnership web page in an attempt to counter arguments of those now exposing the SPP. The site blatantly says, “The SPP is a dialogue to increase security and enhance prosperity among the three countries. The SPP is not an agreement nor is it a treaty. In fact, no agreement was ever signed.” However, according to a report on the SPP written by Former Canadian Prime Minster Paul Martin, one of the three heads of state involved in the March 23, 2005 meeting with Bush and Fox, writes “Thus, on March 23, President Bush, President Fox and I signed the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America…” The full report by Mr. Martin may be read on the Internet at http://www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca/cippic/ips/ips-overview2-en.asp. Why is the Bush Administration lying about this fact?
The obvious answer is because they are doing this without congressional approval and it is therefore ILLEGAL.
Many SPP working groups appear to be driving toward achieving specific objectives as defined by a May, 2005 Council on Foreign Relations(CFR) task force report, which presented a blueprint for expanding the SPP agreement into a North American Union that would merge the U.S., Canada and Mexico into a new governmental form.
COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS DOCUMENT
The CFR report is entitled “Building a North American Community,” and is essentially a five year plan for implementing the North American Union. It may be viewed at the CFR Internet web sight at
A member of the CFR taskforce, Dr. Robert Pastor, wrote a book, published in 2001, titled “Toward a North American Commission.” The CFR taskforce report and the official SPP agreement carry almost identical language as the Pastor’s book.
Though the Bush Administration denies a connection to Dr. Pastor’s book or to the CFR’s report, Dr. Pastor has represented the United States in SPP meetings, including (as mentioned above) the recent
meeting in Alberta, Canada.
The book, the CFR task force and the SPP agreement call for the establishment of a North American Competitiveness Council
to pull in the private sector to the SPP process. In addition, all three call for the establishment of a “North American Advisory
Council,” which is to be an “independent body of advisors,” composed of “eminent persons from outside the government.”
In 2002, Dr. Pastor addressed the Trilateral Commission, calling for the establishment of a North American Investment Fund that would supplement World Bank funds expended in a trilateral effort to develop Mexico economically. The May, 2005 CFR report called for the same fund. Efforts are now underway in the SPP to officially establish the fund.
The CFR Task Force calls for the “creation by 2010 of a North American community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity. We propose a community based on the principle affirmed in the March, 2005 Joint Statement of the three leaders
(of the three nations) that ‘our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary.’ Its boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within the movement of people, products and capital will be legal, orderly, and safe.”
To those ends, the CFR report called for establishment of a common security border perimeter around North America by 2010, along with free movement of people, commerce and capital to be facilitated by the establishment of a North American Border Pass that would replace a U.S. passport for travel between the U.S., Canada and Mexico.
Also envisioned by the CFR task force include a North American Court, a North American inter-parliamentary group, A North American Executive Commission, a North American Military Defense Command, a North American Customs Office and a North American Development Bank.
The task force report is important in the debate over the official Security and Prosperity Partnership operation because, though the Bush Administration denies any connection to the CFR report, the
language used in the CFR task force report and SPP documents, so far, have proven to be nearly identical. Clearly the CFR task force report is being used as the blue print to establish the North American Union.
No Congressional Authorization or Oversight
To date, Congress has passed no legislation to authorize the activities of the SPP, nor to fund its spending. Congress has had no official involvement in the process and has no oversight. Many members of Congress have denied any knowledge of the activities of the SPP. Democrat Congressman Barney Frank (D-MA) has said “It (SPP) was done for the United States solely by the President, with no Congressional involvement.”
Congressman Tom Tancredo, (R-Colo) has demanded that the Bush Administration fully disclose the activities of the SPP working groups,
including revealing the names of the members of those groups. No answers to his demands have yet been received from the Bush Administration, though the activity continues to move forward.
Geri Word, head of the SPP office, located in the Commerce Department, told World Net Daily that the work has not been disclosed because “we did not want to get the contact people of the working groups distracted by calls from the public.” Yet, the SPP denies it is working in secret.
NAFTA Super highway
Quietly, the Bush Administration is working to advance a plan to build super highways through the heart of the United States to transport goods from Mexico and Canada. The highways are part of
the original North American Free Trade Agreement, (NAFTA). The plan is now being advanced through an operation called “North America’s Super Corridor Coalition, Inc” (NASCO).
The Super Transnational System includes multiple lanes for cars and trucks. Plans call for a ten lane, limited access highway to parallel I-35. It will have three lanes each way for passenger cars, two express lanes each way for trucks. Mexican and Canadian cars and trucks will be allowed to travel the highway, over the U.S. border with no direct inspections. The highway will also carry rail lines plus a utility corridor for oil and natural gas pipelines, electric towers,
cables for communications and telephone lines. Speed limits will be relaxed as well as safety inspections for vehicles from
Mexico and Canada. Trucks will be allowed to carry extra tonnage and be extra long. A Railway system will travel up the center of
the highway, allowing Mexican rail road companies to enter the U.S. and travel up the highway.
Several such highways are contemplated. Environmental impact studies have already een completed. In Texas, efforts are
underway as 584,000 acres of privately owned land have been targets for takings through Eminent Domain. It is estimated that at least one million American citizens will be displaced from their homes to build
KANSAS City Customs Port to Be Mexican Soil
Beginning at the southern tip of Mexico, passing through Laredo, TX, the highway heads to an “inland port” in Kansas City, where a “Sentry System” will electronically inspect the cargos, before they head East or West, or continue on North through Duluth, Minnesota and into Canada.
As described on the KC Smart Port’s website http://www.kcsmartport.com), the plan is to enable cheap-labor products made in Communist China to travel in sealed “containers nonstop from the inland port. Is the Idea of a North american Union a conspiracy theory?
No. more to the point, It Is really a debate over political Ideology.
By Tom DeWeese
Specifically, if you believe there should be no borders marking a specific entity called the United States of America, then a North American Union will not concern you. If you believe nationalism, meaning love and pride of country, is a bad thing, then a North American Union will not concern you. If you believe government control of the market, of health care, and of energy policy is a positive force, then a North American Union will not concern you. If you believe anyone should be allowed to enter our nation, even illegally, obtain work, taxpayer-paid social programs, and owe no allegiance to the U.S., then a North American Union will not concern you.
On the other hand, if you believe the United States is the most unique nation on Earth with a government designed to protect your natural liberties, an economic system unlike any other — designed to create economic independence, and a judicial system unknown to any other nation, then a North American Union is a threat to all you hold dear.
Those currently working on such a plan do not share your ideals; they do not support your political positions. They do not understand nor care about your concerns. It’s their political ideology and they see nothing wrong with what they are doing. They consider your opposition to their plans to “harmonize” the U.S.
with Mexico and Canada old fashioned and out of date.
The question is where do you stand?
The other side intends to marginalize your love of country and support of limited government. In fact, the other side doesn’t want to debate the issue at all. It just wants to force its way on you, without discussion, without a VOTE, and without your involvement. And that is why they are trying to operate in secret.
Those of us who oppose this Union on ideological grounds intend to force that debate and let the American people decide how they wish to be governed. And that is why the other side is attacking us so viciously.
“This paranoid and groundless frenzy has been fomented and promoted by a shameless collection of lunatics and losers; crooks, cranks, demagogues and opportunists, who claim the existence of a top secret master plan to join the U.S. , Canada and Mexico in one big super-state and to replace the good old Yankee dollar with a worthless new currency called ‘The Amero.’” Michael Medved, December 28, 2006.
• Mexican economist and researcher Miguel Pickard wrote in an article, published by foreign press, detailing the “deep integration” planned for North America. He said there will be no single treaty and nothing will be submitted to legislatures of the three countries. Instead, he says, the plan for a “merged future” will be implemented through “the signing of regulations not subject to citizen review.” He went on to report of several secret meetings held in all three nations, after which representatives signed “close to 300 regulations” installing a “Unified American Border Action Plan.”
[ Supplement • Page 1 ]
• Pickard went on to express his view that President Bush is vigorously pushing” the idea of a “North American community.” Pickard concluded by saying the schedule calls for beginning with a customs union, then a common market, then a monetary and economic union, and finally the adoption of a single currency.
• Democrat Congressman Barney Frank said in a letter concerning the Security and Prosperity Partnership, “It was done for the United States by the President, with no Congressional involvement. Indeed it is not even a treaty because it has not been ratified by the Senate.”
CNN Anchorman Lou Dobbs said during a report on the SPP, “Have our political elites gone mad?”
“Another delusion usually associated with these fears involves the construction of a ‘Monster Highway’ some sixteen lanes wide through Texas and the Great Plains, connecting two nations on either side for the borders for some nefarious but never-explained purpose.” Michael Medved, December 28, 2006
• In April, 2006, Tx DOT released a 4,000 page Environmental Impact Statement that described a corridor that will be 1200 feet wide (the size of four football fields). It will parallel Interstate 35, and be five lanes north and five lanes south (3 lanes for cars, 2 lanes for trucks). In the middle will be pipelines and rail lines. It will also have a 200 ft wide utility corridor. The corridor will start in Laredo, TX, and run past Austin to the Texas-Oklahoma border. Plans ultimately call for building some 4,000 miles of highway with rail lines and utility lines, combined into super-corridors throughout Texas over the next 50 years.
• “The Oklahoma-to-Mexico stretch would be just the first link in a 4,000 mile, $184 billion network. The corridor would be up to a quarter mile across, consisting of as many as six lanes for cars and four for trucks, plus railroad tracks, oil and gas pipelines, water and other utility lines, and broadband cables.” Associated Press, July 21, 2006.
• Central to the construction of the Trans Texas Corridor is the massive taking of 584,000 acres of private rich farm land, ranches and homes. Supreme Court-approved Eminent Domain will be used to acquire the land.
• The Trans Texas Corridor is the first leg of what is called the NAFTA Super Highway scheduled to go through heartland America all the way to Canada.
• The main reason for opposition (for some nefarious but never-explained purpose) is the lack of inspection of the truck’s cargo as they carry containers loaded in China and off loaded in Mexican ports and driven straight through to an Inland port in Kansas City (KC SmartPort), relying only on electronic screening for drive-through inspections.
Moreover, Mexico will control its own customs facility in Kansas City and therefore able to inspect their own trucks on U.S. territory.
• “This spring (2006), city officials signed off on a 50-year lease for the Mexican facility, with an option for 50 more years…The council earlier this year earmarked $2.5 million in loans and $600,000 in direct aid to SmartPort, which would build and own the inland customs facility and sublet it to the Mexican government through agreements with U.S. Customs and Border Protection…The Mexican government would have no significant investment and would occupy the customs facility operation rent free…SmartPort set up the deal to avoid imposing any expenses on Mexico above its ordinary border costs…SmartPort meanwhile is seeking a $1.5 million grant from the U.S. Economic Development Administration to purchase high-tech gamma-ray screening devices for drive-through inspections of truck cargo…
Confusion and secrecy have been hallmarks of the ambitious project. At the outset, Gutierrez and others have said the customs facility would be sovereign Mexican soil similar to a foreign embassy. This has changed.” Posted by the Kansas City Star, 7-18-06
• Another objection to the highway system is the fact that foreign companies will operate the highways and collect tolls.
• “On a single day in June (2006), an Australian-Spanish partnership paid $3.6 billion to lease the Indiana Toll Road. An Australian company bought a 99-year lease on Virginia’s Pocahontas Parkway, and Texas officials decided to let a Spanish-American partnership build and run a toll road from Austin to Seguin for 50 years.” Associated Press, 7-15-06
• “One principle player is a Spanish construction company, which plans to build the highway and operate it as a toll road. But don’t be fooled: the superhighway proposal is not the result of free market demand, but rather an extension of government-managed trade schemes like NAFTA that benefit politically-correct interests.” Texas Congressman Ron Paul
[ Supplement • Page 2 ]
“The record couldn’t be more clear on the ‘North American Union’ — there’s no one anywhere near the Bush administration, the Congress of the United States, Cabinet departments or even major think tanks who believes it’s a good idea to merge Canada, Mexico and the U.S.” Michael Medved, December28, 2006
• “Away from the spotlight, from Sept.12 to 14 (2006), in Banff prings (Canada), Minister of Public Safety Stockwell Day and Defense Minister Gordon O’Connor met with U.S. and Mexican government officials and business leaders to discuss North American integration at the second North American Forum…The focus of the event…included topics such as ‘ANorth American Energy Strategy,’‘Demographic and Social Dimensions of North American Integration,’ and Opportunities for Security Cooperation’ – all topics where the public interest is at odds with that of big business elites…The public has been kept in the dark while the business elite have played a lead role in designing the blueprint for this more integrated North America.” Reported by the Toronto Star, 9-20-06
• Attending the Banff meeting were Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, former U.S. Trade Rep. Carla Hills, and Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Dr. Thomas Shannon.
• Arizona State University is teaching that the U.S., Mexico and Canada need to be integrated into a unified super-state, where U.S. citizens of the future will be known as “North Americanists.” The program openly calls for the integration of economic issues across the continent, and in many places goes further – such as the call for a common North American currency and an implied joint military.
• “Reformist Mexican President Vincente Fox raises eyebrows with his suggestion that over a decade or two NAFTA should evolve into something like the European Union, with open borders for not only goods and investment but also people. He can rest assured that there is one voice north of the Rio Grand that supports his vision. To wit, this newspaper.” Robert L. Bartley, editor, The Wall Street Journal, editorial, July, 2, 2001.
“Concerning the feds, the entire horror story about ‘North American Union’ is based upon the ‘Security and Prosperity Partnership,’ an utterly innocuous, open, above-board, well-advertised and widely publicized initiative to promote inter-governmental cooperation to fight terrorism, the threat of Avian flu, improve and tighten border security, and promote mutual prosperity.” Michael Medved, December 28, 2006
• “The SPP was not created by a treaty between the nations involved, nor was Congress involved in any way. Instead, the SPP is an unholy alliance of foreign consortiums and officials from several governments.”
Texas Congressman Ron Paul
• Also attending the Banff meeting, according to Canadian CBC News, was Mel Hurtig, noted Canadian author.
According to Hurtig, “We’re talking about such an important thing, we’re talking about the integration of Canada into the United States. For them to hold this meeting in secret and to make every effort to avoid anybody learning it, right away you’ve got to be hugely concerned.”
• “According to the U.S. government website dedicated to the project (www.spp.gov), the SPP is neither a treaty nor a formal agreement. Rather, it is a ‘dialogue’ launched by the heads of state of Canada, Mexico, and the United States at a summit in Waco, Texas in March, 2005. What is a dialogue? We don’t know. What we do know, however, is that Congressional oversight of what might be one of the most significant developments in recent history is non-existent.
Congress has had no role at all in this ‘dialogue’ that many see as a plan for a North American union. According to the SPP website, this ‘dialogue’ will create new supra-national organizations to ‘coordinate’ border security, health policy, economic and trade policy, and energy policy between the governments of Mexico, Canada and the United States. As such, it is but an extension of NAFTA-and CAFTA-like agreements that have far less to do with the free movement of goods and services than they do with government coordination and management of international trade…” Texas
Congressman Ron Paul, 8-30-06
This report is produced by the American Policy Center, 70 Main Street, Suite 23, Warrenton, VA 20186. Telephone: (540) 341-8911.
Web Address: http://www.americanpolicy.org.
[ Supplement • Page 3 ]
110th CONGRESS – 1st Session
HCON 40 IH H. CON. RES. 40
Expressing the sense of Congress that the United States should not engage in the construction of a North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Superhighway System or enter into a North American Union with Mexico and Canada.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 22, 2007
Mr. GOODE (for himself, Mr. WAMP, Mr. JONES of North Carolina, Mr. PAUL, Mr. STEARNS, Mr. DUNCAN, and Ms. FOXX) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
Expressing the sense of Congress that the United States should not engage in the construction of a North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Superhighway System or enter into a North American Union with Mexico and Canada.
Whereas the United States Departments of State, Commerce, and Homeland Security participated in the formation of the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) on March 23, 2005, representing a tri-lateral agreement between the United States, Canada, and Mexico designed, among other things, to facilitate common regulatory schemes between these countries;
Whereas reports issued by the SPP indicate that it has implemented regulatory changes among the three countries that circumvent United States trade, transportation, homeland security, and border security functions and that the SPP will continue to do so in the future;
Whereas the actions taken by the SPP to coordinate border security by eliminating obstacles to migration between Mexico and the United States actually makes the United States-Mexico border less secure because Mexico is the primary source country of illegal immigrants into the United States;
Whereas according to the Department of Commerce, United States trade deficits with Mexico and Canada have significantly
increased since the implementation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA);
Whereas the economic and physical security of the United States is impaired by the potential loss of control of its borders attendant to the full operation of NAFTA and the SPP;
Whereas the regulatory and border security changes implemented and proposed by the SPP violate and threaten United States sovereignty;
Whereas a NAFTA Superhighway System from the west coast of Mexico through the United States and into Canada has been suggested as part of a North American Union to facilitate trade between the SPP countries;
Whereas the State of Texas has already begun planning of the Trans-Texas Corridor, a major multi-modal transportation project beginning at the United States-Mexico border, which would serve as an initial section of a NAFTA Superhighway System;
Whereas it could be particularly difficult for Americans to collect insurance from Mexican companies which employ Mexican drivers involved in accidents in the United States, wich would likely increase the insurance rates for American drivers;
Whereas future unrestricted foreign trucking into the United States can pose a safety hazard due to inadequate maintenance and inspection, and can act collaterally as a conduit for the entry into the United States of illegal drugs, illegal human smuggling, and terrorist activities; and
Whereas a NAFTA Superhighway System would likely include funds from foreign consortiums and be controlled by foreign management, which threatens the sovereignty of the United States: Now, therefore, be it Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That-
(1) the United States should not engage in the construction of a North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Superhighway System;
(2) the United States should not allow the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) to implement further regulations that would create a North American Union with Mexico and Canada; and (3) the President of the United States should indicate strong opposition to these acts or any other proposals that threaten the sovereignty of the United States.
[ Supplement • Page 4 ]
Far East by way of Mexico,” through “a ships-to-rail terminal at the port of Lazaro Cardenas in Mexico,” then up “the evolving trade corridor” to Kansas City, Missouri, where they would have their first inspection. A Kansas City SmartPort brochure explains further, “Kansas City offers the opportunity for sealed cargo containers to travel to Mexican port cities with virtually no border delays.”
Kansas City will be the check point and disbursement center for trucks bringing their cargos into this country from Mexico and Canada. The official organization in charge of setting up the port is KCSmartPort. The searches of goods will not involve open inspections in which truck doors would be opened and the contents inspected by Smart Port personnel or even drug sniffing dogs. Instead the trucks will be simply scanned by high-tech gamma-ray screening in drive-by inspections.
As part of the inland port, a Mexican Customs office is being established. The Kansas City Council has voted a $2.5 million loan to KCSmartPort to build the Mexican customs facility in the West Bottoms near Kemper Area on city-owned land east of Liberty Street and mostly south of Interstate 670.
According to e-mails and other documents obtained by World Net Daily, top executives with the KCSmartPort project, suggest the facility “would need to be designated as Mexican sovereign territory and meet certain requirements.” In addition, Mexico is insisting on the right to be the sole inspector of its own trucks.
The negotiations with Mexico and the U.S. State Department for the final approval of the Mexican Customs office are proceeding in secret.
The “Amero,” merging U.S., Canadian And Mexican currencies
Though it will take some years to finalize, plans are being laid to create a new currency for the coming North American Union, much like the Euro replaced the currencies of individual countries of the European Union. The Amero would replace the U.S. Dollar, Peso and Canadian Dollar.
The plan has been specifically promoted through Dr. Pastor’s book, the blueprint for the rest of the SPP plan, and now may be officially moving through the establishment of a new SPP effort called the “Financial Services Work Group.” To date, it is too early to tell exactly when such a change would move forward, but it is being discussed in high places.
Of course the SPP and the Bush Administration denies that there is even discussion of such a currency. However, on April, 6, 2006, the SPP announced the formation of the Financial Services Working Group. According to its own news release, the Financial Group will focus on “enhancing processes for addressing banking, securities and insurance issues.” It goes on to say, “U.S. financial regulatory agencies will play a critical role in the SPP.”
In truth, the SPP is being put into place incrementally. It will take years before everything is in final order. It took the European Union several years to create the Euro. However, the guiding documents from Dr. Pastor’s book and the CFR report each call for the creation of a North American currency. It is obvious, if one dissects the bureaucratic language of SPP documents, in order to reach its goal to “reduce the cost of trade, combat counterfeiting and facilitate
trade,” among the three nations trying to act as one, the drive for a single currency will certainly become necessary.
A NEW GOVERNMENT FOR NORTH AMERICA
Many Americans simply do not believe that the United States would voluntarily give up its sovereignty to a North American Union. Those who think this way somehow believe that there will be a vote of the American people to decide.
It is little understood that such actions are done incrementally, behind closed doors, until the plans are so far along that stopping them becomes nearly impossible.
The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was sold as simply a way for American producers to broaden their markets. So too, was the European Union sold to the proud, ancient nations of that continent. Today, a new, socialist government rules them, complete with a ruling body, a new currency, a tax system, court system and a defense system –all the ingredients necessary for a government.
OPERATING IN SECRET, SPP working groups are efficiently laying the groundwork for the destruction of the United States of America
as an independent, sovereign nation. Once the North American Union is in place, we will then have to compromise our very unique nation of protected freedoms with the socialist nations of Mexico and Canada, where property rights, justice, economics and natural rights are not necessarily recognized.
The Security and Prosperity Partnership is about neither. It is not a plan to simply help sell American goods to larger markets. It is not a plan to help keep our nation safer in a security partnership with Mexico and Canada. Shutting our borders, not opening them, would do far more to accomplish that goal. The SPP is about creating a continental government which would eventually contain
its own court system, its own ability to collect taxes (including some sort of military or police ability) and its own currency.
The SPP is an invasion of our culture and our economy. It’s about the redistribution of American wealth and industry. It will represent the end of over 250 years of an historic experiment in freedom – unless Americans across the nation SAY NO – NOW.
This report is produced by the American Policy Center, 70 Main Street, Suite 23, Warrenton, VA 20186. Telephone: (540) 341-8911. Web Address: http://www.americapolicy.org. Much of the information for this report was contained in materials produced by investigative journalist Jerome Corsi. His reports on the North American Union may be found on World Net Daily, http://www.worldnetdaily.
com. Human Events, http://www.humanevents. com. Information was also obtained from reports by Phyllis Schlafly, http://www.eagleforum.
org. More information was provided by Dr. Steven Yates, “The United States of North America,” The Ecologic Powerhouse,
http://www.freedom.org. The blueprint for the North American Union may be viewed in it’s entirety on the web site of the Council on Foreign Relations, http://www.cfr.org and the official reports of the SPP working groups, now operating out of the U.S. Department of Commerce, may be viewed at http://www.spp.gov.
The Kansas City SmartPort current being build in Kansas City, MO can be found at http://www.kcsmartport.com.
Please make copies of the report and distribute to as many people as you wish.
THE CHRONOLOGICAL HISTORY FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE NORTH AMERICAN UNION
JUly 2, 2000: Mexican president Vicente Fox proposes a 20 to 30 year time line for the creation of a common North American market.
November 27, 2000: Robert Pastor’s book “Toward a North American Community” is published.
December 2001: U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge and Canadian Deputy Prime Minister John Manley sign the “Smart Border Declaration.” It called for a “30-point action plan to enhance the security of our shared border , while facilitating the legitimate flow of people and goods.”
September 9, 2002: President Bush and Prime Minister Chretien meet to discuss progress in the Smart Border Action Plan. An update on the plan is produced by the White House on December 6, 2002.
December, 2002: U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell signs an agreement between the United States and Canada to establish a Bi-national Agreement on Military Planning.
January, 2003: The Canadian Council of Chief Executives launches the North American Security and Prosperity Initiative (NASPI) to propose a comprehensive North American strategy integrating economic and security issues.
February, 2004: The Council on Foreign Relations publishes Robert Pastor’s paper “North America’s Second Decade,” which advocates further North American integration.
October, 2004: The Canada-Mexico Partnership (CMP) is launched during the visit of President Fox to Ottawa.
November 1, 2004: The Independent Task Force on the Future of North America is formed. The task force is a trilateral effort charged with
developing a “roadmap” to promote “North American security and advance the well-being of citizens of all three countries.” The task force is sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations.
March 23, 2005: President Bush meets at his ranch in Crawford, TX with Vincente Fox of Mexico and Paul Martin of Canada in what they
call a Summit. The three heads of state then drive to Baylor University in Waco, where they issue a press release announcing their signing of an agreement to form the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP).
May 17, 2005: The Independent Task Force on the Future of North America (CFR) releases its report “Creating a North American Community
– Chairman’s Report.” The 59-page document outlines a five-year plan for the “establishment by 2010 of a North American economic and security community” with a common “outer security perimeter” to achieve “the freer flow of people within North America.”
June 9, 2005: Senate Foreign Relations Chairman Richard Lugar held a “friendly” committee hearing that features Task Force member Robert Pastor. He reveals further details of the plan for a “continental perimeter,” including “an integrated continental plan for transportation and infrastructure that includes new North American highways and high-speed rail corridors.”
June 27, 2005: Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff attends a SPP meeting in Ottawa, Canada, at which he said “we want to facilitate the flow of traffic across our borders.” The White House issues a press release endorsing the Ottawa report and calling the meeting “an important first step in achieving the goals of the Security and Prosperity Partnership.”
July, 2005: The White House announces it is backing a coalition called Americans for Border and Economic Security, organized by former
Republican National Committee Chairman Ed Gillespie. Its purpose is to conduct a political-style campaign to sell the American people in a guest-worker program wrapped in a few border-security promises and financed by coalition members who each put up $50,000 to $250,000.
March 31, 2006: President Bush, Vicente Fox and new Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper meet in Cancun, Mexico to (according to the official news release) celebrate the first anniversary of the Security and Prosperity Partnership. At the same time Bush demands that Congress pass an immigration bill with a guest worker permit program.
June 15, 2006: SPP’s North American Competitiveness Council (NACC), consisting of government officials and corporate CEOs from the three countries, met to “institutionalize the North American Security and Prosperity Partnership and the NACC, so that the work will continue through changes of administrations.”
September 12, 2006: In Banff Alberta, Canada, a group of present and past elected officials from all three countries meet with corporate,
military, academic, financial, industrial, and think tank members in a “North American Forum.” U.S. participants include former Secretary of State George Shultz, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, and Robert Pastor, to name a few.
[My comments] how good could this merger be if it was done in secret with a news blackout and anyone that spoke publicly about it was fired and vilified by the establishment media. AND TO DECIDE TO NOT ALLOW THE AMERICAN PEOPLE TO VOTE ON GIVING THEIR COUNTRY AWAY IS THE HIGHEST FORM OF TREASON]
IT’S A DONE DEAL
Canada kept U.S. border talks under wraps: document
Published On Tue Feb 08 2011
Prime Minister Stephen Harper shakes hands with U.S. President Barack Obama in Washington last week.
MARK WILSON/GETTY IMAGES
Les Whittington and Tonda MacCharles Ottawa Bureau
OTTAWA—The federal government deliberately kept negotiations on a border deal with Washington secret while it planned ways to massage public opinion in favour of the pact, according to a confidential communications strategy.
The 14-page public relations document recommended that talks keep a “low public profile” in the months leading up to the announcement by Prime Minister Stephen Harper and U.S. President Barack Obama. At the same time, the government would secretly engage “stakeholders” — interested parties such as big business groups and others — in a way that respected “the confidentiality of the announcement.”
In advance, the government departments involved — including industry, foreign affairs, international trade and citizenship and immigration — were to “align supportive stakeholders to speak positively about the announcement,” according to the strategy prepared by Public Safety Minister Vic Toews’ officials.
On Friday, Harper and Obama signed off on a plan that for the first time that envisions throwing up a single security ring around the perimeter of Canada and the U.S. The wide-ranging blueprint calls for increased cooperation between the two countries’ police, border and intelligence agencies; an integrated Canada-U.S. exit-entry system using high-tech identification techniques and more sharing of information about Canadians with U.S. authorities.
At least three major business organizations — the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, the Canadian Council of Chief Executives and the Canadian Trucking Alliance — quickly issued statements praising the framework agreement Friday.
The document was prepared last fall, when the Canada-U.S. talks were being conducted without any public notice.
Under “communications challenges,” the document lists: “Greater information sharing is part of the initiative. The safeguarding of privacy and sovereignty will be of concern for Canadians.”
It also says Canadians may be too sanguine about security to see the need for the deal. “The Canadian public may underestimate the security threat to Canada.”
The confidential government document also contains a list of “high risk” stakeholders — those in Canada who might raise strenuous objections to stepped-up Canada-U.S. security arrangements.
Officials surmised that Jennifer Stoddart, the federal privacy commissioner, would be worried by plans to share more personal data on Canadians with U.S. authorities. “Will raise concerns re information sharing and protecting private information,” the document says of Stoddart. In response, the government should stress that “we value and respect our separate constitutional and legal frameworks that protect privacy, civil liberties and human rights.” It also recommended “ongoing engagement by officials” with Stoddart.
Advocacy and civil rights groups such as the Council of Canadians, led by Maude Barlow, were also expected to react negatively because of “privacy concerns.” The strategy paper again recommended that Conservatives should stress Canada’s protections for human rights and privacy. It also suggested that cabinet ministers be made available to the media to counteract Barlow’s statements.
Refugee and immigration organizations were considered “high-risk stakeholders” and expected to react by saying the new U.S.-Canada border measures will limit immigration. The recommended response was to say that the deal “will accelerate legitimate travel” and won’t change Canadian immigration and refugee policy. Another high-risk stakeholder was expected to be the Mexican government, which “may raise concerns about not being included in the vision.”
A separate list of “medium risk” stakeholders included academics, who will “expect proof of economic benefits” and may be worried about privacy and sovereignty, and the media, which will “look for specifics” that would be announced later. Also considered a “medium risk” are U.S. critics, who will see the new deal as a “threat to U.S. jobs.”
Now that Canada and the U.S. have begun work on implementing the deal, the Liberals and NDP say they are planning to bring cabinet ministers before a Commons committee to find out the details of the plan.
The public campaign to persuade Canadians that a muscular security deal won’t trade away Canadian rights was clearly underway Monday.
Public Safety Minister Vic Toews, appearing at a Senate committee on national security and defence, painted it as “necessary” to the free flow of cross-boarder trade, and “beneficial” to Canada.
The Americans, he said, bring greater resources, “assets” and much-appreciated expertise to border security, citing joint efforts during the Olympics security operations.
Asked later whether Canadians should be concerned about a new regime that might see random searches or seizures at the border, Toews said there’s little need to worry.
“I don’t think that is a concern that they should have, but those are the kinds of questions that need to be asked and discussed.”
CANADA AND THE UNITED STATES ARE NOW MERGED. HOW LONG BEFORE MEXICO JOINS THEM?
A silent but all-reaching coup has been taking place within the United States. This coup is not being directed by bomb-laden terrorists, nor will it ever be meaningfully covered by the mainstream media. The seditious act is being carried out by our very own elected officials, with President Bush leading the insurrection. We the American people, will not become fully aware of this revolution until this government’s agenda has been achieved and the United States disappears completely.
While many Americans have probably forgotten reporter Jerome Corsi´s revelations into the proposed North American Union, or the merger of the U.S. A., Mexico, and Canada, last year, former Mexican President Vicente Fox recently spoke about the plan publicly. However, his comments received very little coverage from the mainstream press.
On September 12, 2008, Vicente Fox gave a speech at Wayne State University´s forum entitled “Globalization and Immigration.” During the speech, he chastised Americans for not embracing a globalist view, as well as those who enter this country illegally from Mexico.
Fox also pushed his goal for the North American Union. He told the crowd: “What would be better for this nation then having a successful neighbor?…Why don´t we work together to make that dream happen? That dream happened in Europe. Today, Europe is what it is because of that Marshall Plan. They decided to work together. On a destroyed Europe right after the Second World war, the leaders came and had a vision to build up the union. The European Union. They started step by step-by-step. It´s been a 60-year progress.
After the speech, the former Mexican leader sat down for an interview with a local Fox affiliate. The reporter brought up the fact that Americans have become angry over the loss of their jobs due to NAFTA. Fox then informed the reporter in no-uncertain terms, that AMERICAN WORKERS SHOULD SIMPLY “GET OVER IT!” HE SEEMED TO TAKE GREAT PLEASURE IN THE KNOWLEDGE THAT AMERICAN MANUFACTURING JOBS ARE NOT RETURNING. He also talked about the need for a common currency, known as the Amero.
In June 2006, Jerome Corsi writing for Human Events reported on the NAFTA super highway. The proposed road would bring Mexican trucks over the border without a customs inspection until those trucks reach Kansas City. Corsi correctly characterized the border becoming simply a “speed bump” once the highway is finished. The road will cross the heartland of the U.S., eventually ending in Canada. Amazingly, not one network news cast (not even Fox) has mentioned this incredible but true threat to U.S. sovereignty.
In 2007, that became a reality. Mexican trucks began coming into this country every day, without being inspected at the border. The potential for large shipments of drugs, illegal aliens, and even terrorists being carried in those trucks was tremendous. The NAFTA super highway is in fact a smuggler´s dream come true.
Congress eventually ended the flow of Mexican trucks over the border. However, Obama is now working on ways to repackage the program to make it more palatable to the American people.
To add insult to injury, the customs complex (known as Smart Port) in Kansas City will be a Mexican customs station. However, it is being built with funds collected from the taxpaying citizens of Kansas City. The station will reportedly cost $3 million. A description on the Smart Port website reads: “For those who live in Kansas City, the idea of receiving containers nonstop from the Far East by way of Mexico may sound unlikely, but later this month that seemingly far-fetched notion will become a reality.”
NASCO (North American Super Corridor Coalition) is building the NAFTA ten- lane highway. NASCO is a collection of government agencies and private business organizations. NASCO has officially been given $2.5 million by the U.S. Department of Transportation.
So how can private groups pay for a public highway?…On April 30, 1992 President George H.W. Bush issued Executive Order #12803, which allows private investment in U.S. infrastructure…That´s how.
While only $2.5 million in federal dollars is reported to have been spent on this venture, considering the more than 6,000 earmarks in infamous 2006 $300 billion Highway Bill, it is really impossible to know the exact amount of taxpayer money being used on the project. The culture of corruption and lies in Washington makes a true accounting on any matter nearly impossible.
The alliance between Mexican, Canadian, and American government officials and big business is the very definition of a shadow government. One no longer need tune into late night radio host Art Bell, nor order back issues of Fate magazine to examine outrageous conspiracy plots. Though incredible, the pending construction of the NAFTA super highway and the merger of all three North American nations is real and is being directed by our own politicians.
While the idea that a road will be constructed connecting Mexico, the United States, and Canada without the consent of the American people is disgusting. The goal that this road will help support is as frightening as any doomsday scenario one can imagine.
On March 23, 2005, a meeting was held at Baylor University in Waco, TX. The meeting saw President Bush, Vicente Fox of Mexico, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin sign the SPP (Security and Prosperity Partnership)agreement which will effect all three nations. Two stated goals of the SPP are: 1) Securing North America from external threats. 2) Preventing and responding to threats within North America…One must wonder if the “threats within North America” are actually well informed American citizens!
Bush entered into this treaty by calling it a “partnership” or “agreement,” even though it really is a treaty. U.S. law requires approval by two thirds of the Senate before any treaty with another nation can be signed. However, Bush simply skirted the law by calling any bi-lateral or tri-lateral treaties “agreements.” THE SPP WAS SIGNED WITH AN EXECUTIVE ORDER WHICH IS HOW BUSH SOUGHT TO ACHIEVE HIS GLOBALIST AGENDA AND MERGE THE THREE NATIONS, ALL WITHOUT EVER CONSULTING CONGRESS.
The Bush administration established an SPP office within the U.S. Department of Commerce.
A very troubling report is the Council on Foreign Relations´ call for a North American Union. THE CFR PROPOSES THE CREATION OF A NORTH AMERICAN UNION TRIBUNAL WHOSE RULINGS WOULD TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER THE U.S. SUPREME COURT, THE BORDERS BETWEEN MEXICO, THE U.S., AND CANADA TO BE ERASED BY 2010, AS WELL AS THE CREATION OF THE NORTH AMERICAN PARLIAMENTARY GROUP TO SUPERSEDE THE U.S. CONGRESS.
Speculation that former President Bush, and now President Obama plan on merging the U.S. with our neighbors to the North and South is really the only way to explain his lack of action in response to the ongoing tidal wave of illegal aliens flowing over our border with Mexico.
WorldNetDaily just reported that Obama has dropped the “North American Union” label, opting for the more benign North American Leaders Summit. However, the goals are the same. In August 2009, Obama met with his conspiring counterparts in Guadalajara, Mexico.
Bush and his surrogates made a great deal of noise over his decision to send 6,000 National Guard troops to the border. However, the troops were not allowed to stop anyone seen crossing the border illegally, they could only report the incidents to the Border Patrol. The troops were under orders to only work in a support role. The guardsmen spent their time digging latrines, answering phones, making repairs to infrastructure, and performing office duties.
Though the National Guard contingent was supposed to have reached 2,500 along the border by the first of July 2006, the actual number was far lower. At the time, National Guard spokesman Daniel Donohue admitted that there were only 483 troops actually on duty at the U.S.-Mexican border. In reality, only a few hundred troops were sent to the border at a time.
The 2006 Amnesty bill would have not only given amnesty to millions of illegal aliens currently inside the U.S., but also allowed another 100 million new legal immigrants to enter the country over the next 20 years. The bill called for a guest-worker plan for millions more from Mexico. The bill was exactly what President Bush wanted.
Picture for a moment another 100 million mostly Latino American immigrants in this country, as well as the offspring from the illegal aliens already here. Under that plan, the U.S. will become another very crowded and very poor Third World nation.
Of course, Barack Obama also supports so-called “comprehensive immigration reform,” which is simply code for granting amnesty to millions of illegal aliens. During the 2008 Presidential campaign, both Obama and McCain expressed the desire the extend Social security benefits to those working in this country illegally.
Who would benefit from the U.S. devolving into a mostly poor, mostly uneducated nation?…Big business seeking cheap labor and an ever-growing dictatorial federal government.
WHAT CAN WE EXPECT IF THE CLANDESTINE MERGER OF OUR COUNTRY WITH MEXICO GOES FORWARD?
Inundated with the children of so many new immigrants in such a short period of time (both legal and illegal) who cannot speak English, our public education system will collapse. Overwhelmed with millions of uninsured patients, hospital emergency rooms will be forced to close. As turf wars erupt between extremely brutal Latin American gangs, violent crime will become a daily occurrence in all but the most exclusive neighborhoods. Wages for Americans will continue to decrease with the influx of so many Third World laborers. The middle class will disappear and democracy will become irrelevant.
IT IS OBVIOUS THAT THE MOST DANGEROUS THREAT TO THIS NATION DOES NOT EMANATE FROM THE MUSLIM WORLD, NOR FROM A FORMER COLD WAR ENEMY, OUR MOST DANGEROUS THREAT NOW EXISTS WITHIN THOSE WHO ARE SWORN TO PROTECT US.
Below is the Constitution for the New States of North America. It was written many years ago in preparation of the merging Canada, Mexico and the United States. I can’t guarantee this document is what will be rammed down our throats, but I believe what we get will be similar. The law of the 3 former nations will have to harmonized. There is no private gun ownership or free speech permitted in Mexico or Canada so I believe they will be the first of our freedoms to disappear. This constitution was not written by the people. This was written for the people by those who will be their masters. Perhaps it will serve as a glimpse into how you have to live in the New States of North America.
THE “CONSTITUTION FOR THE NEWSTATES OF AMERICA” UNMASKED
The following document is an exact copy of the original as produced by Liberty Lobby. Virtually all of the document paints a grim and hellish picture indeed. However, there are a couple of sections that are so abysmal and so disrespectful of people’s God given rights that they are in a class of their own, even within the context of this horrible document. Those sections are in bold, are italicized, and are in red type. * Liberty Lobby (202) 546-5611 300 Independence Ave., S.E. Washington, DC 20003 This file contains 3 documents: 1: A Proposed Constitutional Model for the Newstates of America. This is to replace the U.S. Constitution. 2. The Proposed Constitution for the ‘Newstates of America’, An analysis by E. Stanley Rittenhouse 3. A Review of the Proposed Constitutional Model for the Newstates of North America, by Col. Curtis B. Dall *
Document Number One
A PROPOSED CONSTITUTIONAL MODEL FOR THE NEWSTATES OF NORTH AMERICA
So that we may join in common endeavors, welcome the future in good order, and create an adequate and self-repairing government – we, the people, do establish the New States of North America, herein provided to be ours, and do ordain this Constitution whose supreme law it shall be until the time prescribed for shall have run.
Rights and Responsibilities
SECTION 1 ..’ Freedom of expression, of communication, of movement, of assembly, or of petition shall not be abridged except in declared emergency. SECTION 2… Access to information possessed by governmental agencies shall not be denied except in interest of national security; but communications among officials necessary to decision making shall be privileged.
SECTION 3..’ Public communicators may decline to reveal sources of information, but shall be responsible for hurtful disclosures.
ECTION 4… The privacy of individuals shall be respected; searches and seizures shall be made only on judicial warrant; persons shall be pursued or questioned only for the prevention of crime or the apprehension of suspected criminals, and only according to rules established under law.
SECTION 5… There shall be no discrimination because of race, creed, color, origin, or sex. The Court of Rights and Responsibilities may determine whether selection for various occupations has been discriminatory.
SECTION 6… All persons shall have equal protection of the laws, and in all electoral procedures the vote of every eligible citizen shall count equally with others.
SECTION 7… It shall be public policy to promote discussion of public issues and to encourage peaceful public gatherings for this purpose. Permission to hold such gatherings shall not be denied, nor shall they be interrupted, except in declared emergency or on a showing of imminent danger to public order and on judicial warrant.
SECTION 8… The practice of religion shall be privileged; but no religion shall be imposed by some on others, and none shall have public support.
SECTION 9… Any citizen may purchase, sell, lease, hold, convey and inherit real and personal property, and shall benefit equally from all laws for security in such transactions.
SECTION 10… Those who cannot contribute to productivity shall be entitled to a share of the national product; but distribution shall be fair and the total may not exceed the amount for this purpose held in the National Sharing Fund. SECTION 11… Education shall be provided at public expense for those who meet appropriate tests of eligibility.
SECTION 12… No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. No property shall be taken without compensation. SECTION 13… Legislatures shall define crimes and conditions requiring restraint, but confinement shall not be for punishment; and when possible, there shall be preparation for return to freedom.
SECTION 14… No person shall be placed twice in jeopardy for the same offense.
SECTION 15… Writs of habeas corpus shall not be suspended except in declared emergency.
SECTION 16… Accused persons shall be informed of charges against them, shall have a speedy trial, shall have reasonable bail, shall be allowed to confront witnesses or to call others, and shall not be compelled to testify against themselves; at the time of arrest they shall be informed of their right to be silent and to have counsel, provided, if necessary, at public expense; and courts shall consider the contention that prosecution may be under an invalid or unjust statute.
SECTION 1… Each freedom of the citizen shall prescribe a corresponding responsibility not to diminish that of others: of speech, communication, assembly, and petition, to grant the same freedom to others; of religion, to respect that of others; of privacy, not to invade that of others; of the holding and disposal of property, the obligation to extend the same privilege to others.
SECTION 2… Individuals and enterprises holding themselves out to serve the public shall serve all equally and without intention to misrepresent, conforming to such standards as may improve health and welfare.
SECTION 3… Protection of the law shall be repaid by assistance in its enforcement; this shall include respect for the procedures of justice, apprehension of lawbreakers, and testimony at trial.
SECTION 4…Each citizen shall participate in the processes of democracy, assisting in the selection of officials and in the monitoring of their conduct in office.
SECTION 5… Each shall render such services to the nation as may be uniformly required by law, objection by reason of conscience being adjudicated as hereinafter provided; and none shall expect or may receive special privileges unless they be for a public purpose defined by law.
SECTION 6… Each shall pay whatever share of governmental costs is consistent with fairness to all.
SECTION 7… Each shall refuse awards or titles from other nations or their representatives except as they be authorized by law.
SECTION 8…There shall be a responsibility to avoid violence and to keep the peace; for this reason the bearing of arms or the possession of lethal weapons shall be confined to the police, members of the armed forces, and those licensed under law.
SECTION 9… Each shall assist in preserving the endowments of nature and enlarging the inheritance of future generations.
SECTION 10… Those granted the use of public lands, the air, or waters shall have a responsibility for using these resources so that, if irreplaceable, they are conserved and, if replaceable, they are put back as they were.
SECTION 11… Retired officers of the armed forces, of the senior civil service, and of the Senate shall regard their service as a permanent obligation and shall not engage in enterprise seeking profit from the government.
SECTION 12… The devising or controlling of devices for management or technology shall establish responsibility for resulting costs.
SECTION 13… All rights and responsibilities defined herein shall extend to such associations of citizens as may be authorized by law.
ARTICLE II… THE NEW STATES
SECTION 1… There shall be New states, each comprising no less than 5 percent of the whole population. Existing states may continue and may have the status of Newstates if the Boundary Commission, hereinafter provided, shall so decide. The Commission shall be guided in its recommendations by the probability of accommodation to the conditions for effective government. States electing by referendum to continue if the Commission recommend otherwise shall nevertheless accept all Newstate obligations.
SECTION 2… The Newstates shall have constitutions formulated and adopted by processes hereinafter prescribed.
SECTION 3… They shall have Governors; legislatures, and planning administrative and judicial systems.
SECTION 4… Their political procedures shall be organized and supervised by electoral Overseers; but their elections shall not be in years of presidential election.
SECTION 5… The electoral apparatus of the Newstates of North America shall be available to them, and they may be allotted funds under rules agreed to by the national Overseer; but expenditures may not be made by or for any candidate except they be approved by the Overseer; and requirements of residence in a voting district shall be no longer than thirty days.
SECTION 6… They may charter subsidiary governments, urban or rural, and may delegate to them powers appropriate to their responsibilities.
SECTION 7… They may lay, or may delegate the laying of, taxes; but these shall conform to the restraints stated hereinafter for the Newstates of North America.
SECTION 8… They may not tax exports, may not tax with intent to prevent imports, and may not impose any tax forbidden by laws of the Newstates of North America; but the objects appropriate for taxation shall be clearly designated.
SECTION 9… Taxes on land may be at higher rates than those on its improvements.
SECTION 10… They shall be responsible for the administration of public services not reserved to the government of the Newstates of North America, such activities being concerned with those of corresponding national agencies, where these exist, under arrangements common to all.
SECTION 11… The rights and responsibilities prescribed in this Constitution shall be effective in the Newstates and shall be suspended only in emergency when declared by Governors and not disapproved by the Senate of the Newstates of North America.
SECTION 12… Police powers of the Newstates shall extend to all matters not reserved to the Newstates of North America; but prompted powers shall not be impaired.
SECTION 13… Newstates may not enter into any treaty, alliance, confederation, or agreement unless approved by the Boundary Commission hereinafter provided. They may not coin money, provide for the payment of debts in any but legal tender, or make any charge for inter-Newstate services. They may not enact ex post facto laws or ones impairing the obligation of contracts.
SECTION 14… Newstates may not impose barriers to imports from other jurisdictions or impose any hindrance to citizens’ freedom of movement. SECTION 15… If governments of the Newstates fail to carry out fully their constitutional duties, their officials shall be warned and may be required by the Senate, on the recommendation of the Watchkeeper, to forfeit revenues from the Newstates of North America.
ARTICLE III THE ELECTORAL BRANCH
SECTION 1* To arrange for participation by the electorate in the determination of policies and the selection of officials, there shall be an Electoral Branch. *SECTION 2* An Overseer of electoral procedures shall be chosen by majority of the Senate and may be removed by a two-thirds vote. It shall be the Overseer’s duty to supervise the organization of national and district parties, arrange for discussion among them, and provide for the nomination and election of candidates for public office. While in office the Overseer shall belong to no political organization; and after each presidential election shall offer to resign. *SECTION 3* A national party shall be one have had at least a 5 percent affiliation in the latest general election; but a new party shall be recognized when valid petitions have been signed by at least 2 percent of the voters in each of 30 percent of the districts drawn for the House of Representatives. Recognition shall be suspended upon failure to gain 5 percent of the votes at a second election, 10 percent at a third, or 15 percent at further elections. District parties shall be recognized when at least 2 percent of voters shall have signed petitions of affiliation; but recognition shall be withdrawn upon failure to attract the same percentages as are necessary for the continuance of national parties.
SECTION 4… Recognition by the Overseer shall bring parties within established regulations and entitle them to common privileges.
SECTION 5… The Overseer shall promulgate rules for party conduct and shall see that fair practices are maintained, and for this purpose shall appoint deputies in each district and shall supervise the choice, in district and national conventions, of party administrators. Regulations and appointments may be objected to by the Senate.
SECTION 6… The Overseer, with the administrator and other officials, shall:
a. Provide the means for discussion, in each party, of public issues, and for this purpose, ensure that members have adequate facilities for participation.
b. Arrange for discussion, in annual district meetings, of the President’s views, of the findings of the Planning Branch, and such other information as may be pertinent for the enlightened political discussion. c. Arrange, on the first Saturday in each month, for enrollment, valid for one year, of voters at convenient places.
SECTION 7… The Overseer shall also:
a. Assist the parties in nominating candidates for district members of the House of Representatives each three years; and for this purpose designate one hundred districts, each with a similar number of eligible voters, redrawing districts after each election. In these there shall be party conventions having no more than three hundred delegates, so distributed that representation of voters be approximately equal. — Candidates for delegate may become eligible by presenting petitions signed by two hundred registered voters. They shall be elected by party members on the first Tuesday in March, those having the largest number of votes being chosen until the three hundred be complete. Ten alternates shall also be chosen by the same process. — District conventions shall be held on the first Tuesday in April. Delegates shall choose three candidates for membership in the House of Representatives, the three having the most votes becoming candidates.
b. Arrange for the election each three years of three members of the House of Representatives in each district from among the candidates chosen in party conventions, the three have the most votes to be elected.
SECTION 8… The Overseer shall also:
a. Arrange for national conventions to meet nine years after previous presidential elections, with an equal number of delegates from each district, the whole number not to exceed one thousand. — Candidates for delegates shall be eligible when petitions signed by five hundred registered voters have been filed. Those with the most votes, together with two alternates, being those next in number of votes, shall be chosen in each district.
b. Approve procedures in these conventions for choosing one hundred candidates to be members-at-large of the House of Representatives, whose terms shall be coterminous with that of the President. For this purpose delegates shall file one choice with convention officials. Voting on submissions shall proceed until one hundred achieve 10 percent, but not more than three candidates may be resident in any one district; if any district have more than three, those with the fewest votes shall be eliminated, others being added from the districts having less than three, until equality be reached. Of those added, those having the most votes shall be chosen first.
c. Arrange procedures for the consideration and approval of party objectives by the convention. d. Formulate rules for the nomination in these conventions of candidates for President and Vice Presidents when the offices are to fall vacant, candidates for nomination to be recognized when petitions shall have been presented by one hundred or more delegates, pledged to continue support until candidates can no longer win or until they consent to withdraw. Presidents and Vice-Presidents, together with Representatives-at- large, shall submit to referendum after serving for three years, and if they are rejected, new conventions shall be held within one month and candidates shall be chosen as for vacant offices. — Candidates for President and Vice-Presidents shall be nominated on attaining a majority. e. Arrange for the election on the first Tuesday in June, in appropriate years, of new candidates for President and Vice-Presidents, and members-at-large of the House of Representatives, all being presented to the nation’s voters as a ticket; if no ticket achieve a majority, the Overseer shall arrange another election, on the third Tuesday in June, between the two persons having the most votes; and if referendum so determine he shall provide similar arrangements for the nomination and election of candidates. — In this election, the one having the most votes shall prevail.
SECTION 9… The Overseer shall also: a. Arrange for the convening of the national legislative houses on the fourth Tuesday of July. b. Arrange for inauguration of the President and Vice- Presidents on the second Tuesday of August.
SECTION 10… All costs of electoral procedures shall be paid from public funds, and there shall be no private contributions to parties or candidates; no contributions or expenditures for meetings, conventions, or campaigns shall be made; and no candidate for office may make any personal expenditures unless authorized by a uniform rule of the Overseer; and persons or groups making expenditures, directly or indirectly, in support of prospective candidates shall report to the Overseer and shall conform to his regulations.
SECTION 11… Expenses of the Electoral Branch shall be met by the addition of one percent to the net annual taxable income returns of taxpayers, this sum to be held by the chancellor of Financial Affairs for disposition by the Overseer. Funds shall be distributed to parties in proportion to the respective number of votes cast for the President and Governors at the last election, except that new parties, on being recognized, shall share in proportion to their number. Party administrators shall make allocations to legislative candidates in amounts proportional to the party vote at the last elections. Expenditures shall be audited by the Watchkeeper; and sums not expended within four years shall be returned to the treasury. It shall be a condition of every communications franchise that reasonable facilities shall be available for allocations by the overseer.
ARTICLE IV THE PLANNING BRANCH
SECTION 1… There shall be a Planning Branch to formulate and administer plans and to prepare budgets for the uses of expected income in pursuit of policies formulated by the processes provided herein.
SECTION 2… There shall be a National Planning Board of fifteen members appointed by the President; the first members shall have terms designated by the President of one to fifteen years, thereafter one shall be appointed each year; the President shall appoint a Chairman who shall serve for fifteen years unless removed by him.
SECTION 3… The Chairman shall appoint, and shall supervise, a planning administrator, together with such deputies as may be agreed to by the Board. SECTION 4… The Chairman shall present to the Board six- and twelve-year development plans prepared by the planning staff. They shall be revised each year after public hearings, and finally in the year before they are to take effect. They shall be submitted to the President on the fourth Tuesday in July for transmission to the Senate on September 1st with his comments. If members of the Board fail to approve the budget proposals by the forwarding date, the Chairman shall nevertheless make submission to the President with notations of reservation by such members. The President shall transmit this proposal, with his comments, to the House of Representatives on September 1.
SECTION 5… It shall be recognized that the six- and twelve-year development plans represent national intentions tempered by the appraisal of possibilities. The twelve-year plan shall be a general estimate of probable progress, both governmental and private; the six-year plan shall be more specific as to estimated income and expenditure and shall take account of necessary revisions. The purpose shall be to advance, through every agency of government, the excellence of national life. It shall be the further purpose to anticipate innovations, to estimate their impact, to assimilate them into existing institutions, and to moderate deleterious effects on the environment and on society. The six- and twelve-year plans shall be disseminated for discussion and the opinions expressed shall be considered in the formulation of plans for each succeeding year with special attention to detail in proposing the budget. SECTION 6… For both plans an extension of one year into the future shall be made each year and the estimates for all other years shall be revised accordingly. For nongovernmental activities the estimate of developments shall be calculated to indicate the need for enlargement or restriction.
SECTION 7… If there be objection by the President or the Senate to the six- or Twelve-year plans, they shall be returned for restudy and resubmission. If there still be differences, and if the President and the Senate agree, they shall prevail. If they do not agree, the Senate shall prevail and the plan shall be revised accordingly.
SECTION 8… The Newstates, on June 1, shall submit proposals for development to be considered for inclusion in those for the Newstates of America. Researches and administration shall be delegated, when convenient, to planning agencies of the Newstates.
SECTION 9… There shall be submissions from private individuals or from organized associations affected with a public interest, as defined by the Board. They shall report intentions to expand or contract, estimates of production and demand, probable uses of resources, numbers expected to be employed, and other essential information.
SECTION 10… The Planning Branch shall make and have custody of official maps, and these shall be documents of reference for future developments both public and private; on them the location of facilities, with extension indicated, and the intended use of all areas shall be marked out. Official maps shall also be maintained by the planning agencies of the Newstates, and in matters not exclusively national the National Planning Board may rely on these. Undertakings in violation of official designation shall be at the risk of the venturer, and there shall be no recourse; but losses from designations after acquisition shall be recoverable in actions before the Court of Claims. SECTION 11…The Planning Branch shall have available to it funds equal to one-half of one percent of the approved national budget (not including debt services or payments from trust funds). They shall be held by the Chancellor of Financial Affairs and expended according to rules approved by the Board; but funds not expended within six years shall be available for other users. SECTION 12… Allocations may be made for the planning agencies of the Newstates; but only the maps and plans of the national Board, or those approved by them, shall have status at law.
SECTION 13…l In making plans, there shall be due regard to the interests of other nations and such cooperation with their intentions as may be approved by the Board.
SECTION 14… There may also be cooperation with international agencies and such contributions to their work as are not disapproved by the President. *ARTICLE V THE PRESIDENCY
SECTION 1… The President of the Newstates of America shall be the head of government, shaper of its commitments, expositor of its policies, and supreme commander of its protective forces; shall have one term of nine years, unless rejected by 60 percent of the electorate after three years; shall take care that the nation’s resources are estimated and are apportioned to its more exigent needs; shall recommend such plans, legislation, and action as may be necessary; and shall address the legislators each year on the state of the nation, calling upon them to do their part for the general good.
SECTION 2… There shall be two Vice-Presidents elected with the President; at the time of taking office the President shall designate one Vice-President to supervise internal affairs; and one to be deputy for general affairs. The deputy for general affairs shall succeed if the presidency be vacated; the Vice- President for internal affairs shall be second in succession. If either Vice-President shall die or be incapacitated the President, with the consent of the Senate, shall appoint a successor. Vice-Presidents shall serve during an extended term with such assignments as the President may make. If the presidency fall vacant through the disability of both Vice-Presidents, the Senate shall elect successors from among its members to serve until the next general election. With the Vice-Presidents and other officials the President shall see to it that the laws are faithfully executed and shall pay attention to the findings and recommendations of the Planning Board, the National Regulatory Board, and the Watchkeeper in formulating national policies.
SECTION 3… Responsible to the Vice-President for General Affairs there shall be Chancellors of External, Financial, Legal, and Military Affairs. The Chancellor of External Affairs shall assist in conducting relations with other nations. The Chancellor of Financial Affairs shall supervise the nation’s financial and monetary systems, regulating its capital markets and credit-issuing institutions as they may be established by law; and this shall include lending institutions for operations in other nations or in cooperation with them, except that treaties may determine their purposes and standards. The Chancellor of Legal Affairs shall advise governmental agencies and represent them before the courts. The Chancellor of Military Affairs shall act for the presidency in disposing all armed forces except militia commanded by governors; but these shall be available for national service at the President’s convenience. Except in declared emergency, the deployment of forces in far waters or in other nations without their consent shall be notified in advance to a national security committee of the Senate hereinafter provided.
SECTION 4… Responsible to the Vice-President for Internal Affairs there shall be chancellors of such departments as the President may find necessary for performing the services of government and are not rejected by a two-thirds vote when the succeeding budget is considered. *
SECTION 5… Candidates for the presidency and the vice-presidencies shall be natural-born citizens. Their suitability may be questioned by the Senate within ten days of their nomination, and if two-thirds of the whole agree, they shall be ineligible and a nominating convention shall be reconvened. At the time of his nomination no candidate shall be a member of the Senate and none shall be on active service in the armed forces or a senior civil servant.
SECTION 6… The President may take leave because of illness or for an interval of relief, and the Vice-President in charge of General Affairs shall act. The President may resign if the Senate agree; and, if the term shall have more than two years to run, the Overseer shall arrange for a special election for President and Vice-President.
SECTION 7… The Vice-Presidents may be directed to perform such ministerial duties as the President may find convenient; but their instructions shall be of record, and their actions shall be taken as his deputy.
SECTION 8… Incapacitation may be established without concurrence of the President by a three-quarters vote of the Senate, whereupon a successor shall become Acting President until the disability be declared, by a similar vote, to be ended or to have become permanent. Similarly the other Vice-President shall succeed if a predecessor die or be disabled. Special elections, in these contingencies, may be required by the Senate. Acting Presidents may appoint deputies, unless the Senate object, to assume their duties until the next election. SECTION 9… The Vice-Presidents, together with such other officials as the President may designate from time to time, may constitute a cabinet or council; but this shall not include officials of other branches.
SECTION 10… Treaties or agreements with other nations, negotiated under the President’s authority, shall be in effect unless objected to by a majority of the Senate within ninety days. If they are objected to, the President may resubmit and the Senate reconsider. If a majority still object, the Senate shall prevail. SECTION 11… All officers, except those of other branches, shall be appointed and may be removed by the President. A majority of the Senate may object to appointments within sixty days, and alternative candidates shall be offered until it agrees.
SECTION 12… The President shall notify the Planning Board and the House of Representatives, on the fourth Tuesday in June, what the maximum allowable expenditures for the ensuing fiscal year shall be. The President may determine to make expenditures less than provided in appropriations; but, except in declared emergency, none shall be made in excess of appropriations. Reduction shall be because of changes in requirements and shall not be such as to impair the integrity of budgetary procedures.
SECTION 13…There shall be a Public Custodian, appointed by the President and removable by him, who shall have charge of properties belonging to the government, but not allocated to specific agencies, who shall administer common public services, shall have charge of building construction and rentals, and shall have such other duties as may be designated by the President or the designated Vice Presidents.
SECTION 14… There shall be an Intendant responsible to the President who shall supervise Offices for Intelligence and Investigation; also an Office of Emergency Organization with the duty of providing plans and procedures for such contingencies as can be anticipated. The Intendant shall also charter nonprofit corporations (or foundations), unless the President shall object, determined by him to be for useful public purposes. Such corporations shall be exempt from taxation but shall conduct no profit-making enterprises. *SECTION 15… The Intendant shall also be a counselor for the coordination of scientific and cultural experiments, and for studies within the government and elsewhere, and for this purpose shall employ such assistance as may be found necessary.
SECTION 16… Offices for other purposes may be established and may be discontinued by presidential order within the funds allocated in the procedures of appropriation.
ARTICLE VI THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH
(The Senate and the House of Representatives)
A. THE SENATE
SECTION 1… There shall be a Senate with membership as follows: If they so desire, former Presidents, Vice-Presidents, Principal Justices, Overseers, Chairmen of the Planning and Regulatory Boards, Governors having had more than seven years service, and unsuccessful candidates for the presidency and vice-presidency who have received at least 30 percent of the vote. To be appointed by the President, three persons who have been Chancellors, two officials from the civil services, two officials from the diplomatic services, two senior military officers, also one person from a panel of three, elected in a process approved by the Overseer, by each of twelve such groups or associations as the President may recognize from time to time to be nationally representative, but none shall be a political or religious group, no individual selected shall have been paid by any private interest to influence government, and any association objected to by the Senate shall not be recognized. Similarly, to be appointed by the Principal Justice, two persons distinguished in public law and two former members of the High Courts or the Judicial Council. Also, to be elected by the House of Representatives, three members who have served six or more years. Vacancies shall be filled as they occur.
SECTION 2… Membership shall continue for life, except that absences not provided for by rule shall constitute retirement, and that Senators may retire voluntarily.
SECTION 3… The Senate shall elect as presiding officer a Convener who shall serve for two years, when his further service may be discontinued by a majority vote. Other officers, including a Deputy, shall be appointed by the Convener unless the Senate shall object.
SECTION 4… The Senate shall meet each year on the second Tuesday in July and shall be in continuous session, but may adjourn to the call of the Convener. A quorum shall be more than three-fifths of the whole membership.
SECTION 5… The Senate shall consider, and return within thirty days, all measures approved by the House of Representatives (except the annual budget). Approval or disapproval shall be by a majority vote of those present. Objection shall stand unless the House of Representatives shall overcome it by a majority vote plus one; if no return be made, approval by the House of Representatives shall be final. For consideration of laws passed by the House of Representatives or for other purposes, the Convener may appoint appropriate committees. SECTION 6… The Senate may ask advice from the Principal Justice concerning the constitutionality of measures before it; and if this be done, the time for return to the House of Representatives may extend to ninety days. SECTION 7… If requested, the Senate may advise the President on matters of public interest; or, if not requested, by resolution approved by two-thirds of those present. There shall be a special duty to expressions of concern during party conventions and commitments made during campaigns; and if these be neglected, to remind the President and the House of Representatives that these undertakings are to be considered.
SECTION 8… In time of present or prospective danger caused by cataclysm, by attack, or by insurrection, the Senate may declare a national emergency and may authorize the President to take appropriate action. If the Senate be dispersed, and no quorum available, the President may proclaim the emergency, and may terminate it unless the Senate shall have acted. If the President be not available, and the circumstances extreme, the senior serving member of the presidential succession may act until a quorum assembles.
SECTION 9… The Senate may also define and declare a limited emergency in time of prospective danger, or of local or regional disaster, or if an extraordinary advantage be anticipated. It shall be considered by the House of Representatives within three days and, unless disapproved, may extend for a designated period and for a limited area before renewal. Extraordinary expenditures during emergency may be approved, without regard to usual budget procedures, by the House of Representatives with the concurrence of the President.
SECTION 10… The Senate, at the beginning of each session, shall select three of its members to constitute a National Security Committee to be consulted by the President in emergencies requiring the deployment of the armed forces abroad. If the Committee dissent from the President’s proposal, it shall report to the Senate, whose decision shall be final.
SECTION 11… The Senate shall elect, or may remove, a National Watchkeeper, and shall oversee, through a standing committee, a Watchkeeping Service conducted according to rules formulated for their approval. With the assistance of an appropriate staff the Watchkeeper shall gather and organize information concerning the adequacy, competence, and integrity of governmental agencies and their personnel, as well as their continued usefulness; and shall also suggest the need for new or expanded services, making report concerning any agency of the deleterious effect of its activities on citizens or on the environment. The Watchkeeper shall entertain petitions for the redress of grievances and shall advise the appropriate agencies if there be need for action. For all these purposes, personnel may be appointed, investigations made, witnesses examined, post audits made, and information required. The Convener shall present the Watchkeeper’s findings to the Senate, and if it be judged to be in the public interest, they shall be made public or, without being made public, be sent to the appropriate agency for its guidance and such action as may be needed. On recommendation of the Watchkeeper the Senate may initiate corrective measures to be voted on by the House of Representatives within thirty days. When approved by a majority and not vetoed by the President, they shall become law. For the Watchkeeping Service one-quarter of one percent of individual net taxable incomes shall be held by the Chancellor of Financial Affairs; but amounts not expended in any fiscal year shall be available for general use.
B… THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
SECTION 1… The House of Representatives shall be original lawmaking body of the Newstates of America.
SECTION 2… It shall convene each year on the second Tuesday in July and shall remain in continuous session except that it may adjourn to the call of a Speaker, elected by a majority vote from among the Representatives-at-large, who shall be its presiding officer.
SECTION 3… It shall be a duty to implement the provisions of this constitution and, in legislature to be guided by them.
SECTION 4… Party leaders and their deputies shall be chosen by caucus at the beginning of each session.
SECTION 5…Standing and temporary committees shall be selected as follows: Committees dealing with the calendaring and management of bills shall have a majority of members nominated to party caucuses by the Speaker; other members shall be nominated by minority leaders. Membership shall correspond to the parties’ proportions at the last election. If nominations be not approved by a majority of the caucus, the Speaker or the minority leaders shall nominate others until a majority shall approve. Members of other committees shall be chosen by party caucus in proportion to the results of the last election. Chairmen shall be elected annually from among at-large-members. Bills referred to committees shall be returned to the house with recommendations within sixty days unless extension be voted by the House. In all committee actions names of those voting for and against shall be recorded. No committee chairman may serve longer than six years.
SECTION 6… Approved legislation, not objected to by the Senate within the allotted time, shall be presented to the President for his approval or disapproval. If the President disapprove, and three- quarters of the House membership still approve, it shall become law. The names of those voting for and against shall be recorded. Bills not returned within eleven days shall become law.
SECTION 7… The President may have thirty days to consider measures approved by the House unless they shall have been submitted twelve days previous to adjournment.
SECTION 8… The house shall consider promptly the annual budget; if there be objection, it shall be notified to the Planning Board; The Board shall then resubmit through the President; and, with his comments, it shall be returned to the House. If there still be objection by a two-thirds majority, the House shall prevail. Objection must be by whole title; titles not objected to when voted on shall constitute appropriation. The budget for the fiscal year shall be in effect on January 1. Titles not yet acted on shall be as in the former budget until action be completed.
SECTION 9… It shall be the duty of the House to make laws concerning taxes. 1. For their laying and collection:
a. They shall be uniform, and shall not be retroactive.
b. Except such as may be authorized by law to be laid by Authorities, or by the Newstates, all collections shall be made by a national revenue agency. This shall include collections for trust funds hereinafter authorized.
c. Except for corporate levies to be held in the National Sharing Fund, hereinafter authorized, taxes may be collected only from individuals and only from incomes; but there may be withholding from current incomes.
d. To assist in the maintenance of economic stability, the President may be authorized to alter rates by executive order.
e. They shall be imposed on profitmaking enterprises owned or conducted by religious establishments or other nonprofit organizations.
f. There shall be none on food, medicines, residential rentals, or commodities or services designated by law as necessities; and there shall be no double taxation. g. None shall be levied for registering ownership or transfer of property.
2. For expenditure from revenues:
a. For the purposes detailed in the annual budget unless objection be made by the procedure prescribed herein.
b. For such other purposes as the House may indicate and require the Planning Board to include in revision of the budget; but, except in declared emergency, the total may not exceed the President’s estimate of available funds.
3. For fixing the percentage of net corporate taxable incomes to be paid into a National Sharing Fund to be held in the custody of the Chancellor of Financial Affairs and made available for such welfare and environmental purposes as are authorized by law.
4. To provide for the regulation of commerce with other nations and among the Newstates, Possessions, Territories; or, as shall be mutually agreed, with other organized governments; but exports shall not be taxed; and imports shall not be taxed except on recommendation of the President at rates whose allowable variations shall have been fixed by law. There shall be no quotas, and no nations favored by special rates, unless by special acts requiring two-thirds majorities. 5. To establish, or provide for the establishment of institutions for the safekeeping of savings, for the gathering and distribution of capital, for the issuance of credit, for regulating the coinage of money, for controlling the media of exchange, and for stabilizing prices; but such institutions, when not public or semipublic, shall be regarded as affected with the public interest and shall be supervised by the Chancellor of Financial Affairs.
6. To establish institutions for insurance against risks and liabilities for communication, transportation, and others commonly used and necessary for public convenience.
[7. paragraph not in the copy used for this file]
8. To assist in the maintenance of world order, and, for this purpose, when the President shall recommend to vest jurisdiction in international legislative, judicial, or administrative agencies.
9. To develop with other peoples, and for the benefit of all, the resources of space, of other bodies in the universe, and of the seas beyond twelve miles from low-water shores unless treaties shall provide other limits.
10. To assist other peoples who have not attained satisfactory levels of well-being; to delegate the administration of funds for assistance, whenever possible, to international agencies; and to invest in or contribute to the furthering of development in other parts of the world.
11. To assure, or to assist in assuring, adequate and equal facilities for education; for training in occupations citizens may be fitted to pursue; and to reeducate or retrain those whose occupations may become obsolete.
12. To establish or to assist institutions devoted to higher education, to research, or to technical training.
13. To establish and maintain, or assist in maintaining, libraries, archives, monuments, and other places of historic interest.
14. To assist in the advancement of sciences and technologies; and to encourage cultural activities.
15. To conserve natural resources by purchase, by withdrawal from use, or by regulation; to provide, or to assist in providing, facilities for recreation; to establish and maintain parks, forests, wilderness areas, wetlands, and prairies; to improve streams and other waters; to ensure the purity of air and water; to control the erosion of soils; and to provide for all else necessary for the protection and common use of the national heritage.
16. To acquire property and improvements for public use at costs to be fixed, if necessary, by the Court of Claims.
17. To prevent the stoppage or hindrance of governmental procedures, or other activities affected with a public interest as defined by law, by reason of disputes between employers and employees, or for other reasons, and for this purpose to provide for conclusive arbitration if adequate provision for collective bargaining fail. From such findings there may be appeal to the Court of Arbitration Review; but such proceedings may not stay the acceptance of findings.
18. To support an adequate civil service for the performance of such duties as may be designated by administrators; and for this purpose to refrain from interference with the processes of appointment of placement, asking advice or testimony before committees only with the consent of appropriate superiors.
19. To provide for the maintenance of armed forces.
20. To enact such measures as will assist families in making adjustment to future conditions, using estimates concerning population and resources made by the Planning Board.
21. To vote within ninety days on such measures as the President may designate as urgent.
ARTICLE VII THE REGULATORY BRANCH
SECTION 1… There shall be a Regulatory Branch, and there shall be a National Regulator chosen by majority vote of the Senate and removable by a two-thirds vote of that body. His term shall be seven years, and he shall make and administer rules for the conduct of all economic enterprises. The Regulatory Branch shall have such agencies as the Board may find necessary and are not disapproved by law.
SECTION 2… The Regulatory Board shall consist of seventeen members recommended to the Senate by the Regulator. Unless rejected by majority vote they shall act with the Regulator as a lawmaking body for industry. They shall initially have terms of one to seventeen years, one being replaced each year and serving for seventeen years. They shall be compensated and shall have no other occupation.
SECTION 3…Under procedures approved by the Board, the Regulator shall charter all corporations or enterprises except those exempted because of size or other characteristics, or those supervised by the Chancellor of Financial Affairs, or by the Intendant, or those whose activities are confined to one Newstate. Charters shall describe proposed activities, and departure from these shall require amendment on penalty of revocation. For this purpose there shall be investigation and enforcement services under the direction of the Regulator. SECTION 4… Chartered enterprises in similar industries or occupations may organize joint Authorities. These may formulate among themselves codes to ensure fair competition, meet external costs, set standards for quality and service, expand trade, increase production, eliminate waste, and assist in standardization. Authorities may maintain for common use services for research and communication; but membership shall be open to all eligible enterprises. Nonmembers shall be required to maintain the same standards as those prescribed for members.
SECTION 5…uthorities shall have governing committees of five, two being appointed by the Regulator to represent the public. They shall serve as he may determine; they shall be compensated; and he shall take care that there be no conflicts of interest. The Board may approve or prescribe rules for the distribution of profits to stockholders, allowable amounts of working capital, and reserves. Costing and all other practices affecting the public interest shall be monitored. All codes shall be subject to review by the Regulator with his board.
SECTION 6… Member enterprises of an Authority shall be exempt from other regulation. *
SECTION 7… The regulator, with his Board, shall fix standards and procedures for mergers of enterprises or the acquisition of some by others; and these shall be in effect unless rejected by the Court of Administrative Settlements. The purpose shall be to encourage adaptation to change and to further approved intentions for the nation.
SECTION 8… The charters of enterprises may be revoked and Authorities may be dissolved by the Regulator, with the concurrence of the Board, if they restrict the production of goods and services, or controls of their prices; also if external costs are not assessed to their originators or if the ecological impacts of their operations a… Operations extending abroad shall conform to policies notified to the Regulator by the President; and he shall restrict or control such activities as appear to injure the national interest.
SECTION 9…The Regulator shall make rules for and shall supervise marketplaces for goods and services; but this shall not include security exchanges regulated by the Chancellor of Financial Affairs.
SECTION 10… Designation of enterprises affected with a public interest, rules for conduct of enterprises and of their Authorities, and other actions of the Regulator or of the Boards may be appealed to the Court of Administrative Settlements, whose judgments shall be informed by the intention to establish fairness to consumers and competitors and stability in economic affairs. SECTION 11…Responsible also to the Regulator, there shall be an Operations Commission appointed by the Regulator, unless the Senate object, for the supervision of enterprises owned in whole or in part by government. The commission shall choose its chairman, and he shall be the executive head of a supervisory staff. He may require reports, conduct investigations, and make rules and recommendations concerning surpluses or deficits, the absorption of external costs, standards of service, and rates or prices charged for services or goods. Each enterprise shall have a director, chosen by and removable by the Commission; and he shall conduct its affairs in accordance with standards fixed by the Commission.
ARTICLE VIII THE JUDICIAL BRANCH
SECTION 1…There shall be a Principal Justice of the Newstates for America; a Judicial Council; and a Judicial Assembly. There shall also be a Supreme Court and a High Court of Appeals; also Courts of Claims, Rights and Duties, Administrative Review, Arbitration Settlements, Tax Appeals, and Appeals from Watchkeeper’s Findings. There shall be Circuit Courts to be of first resort in suits brought under national law; and they shall hear appeals from courts of the Newstates. Other courts may be established by law on recommendation of the Principal Justice with the Judicial Council.
SECTION 2… The Principal Justice shall preside over the judicial system, shall appoint the members of all national courts, and unless the Judicial Council object, shall make its rules; also, through an Administrator, supervise its operations.
SECTION 3…The Judicial Assembly shall consist of Circuit Court Judges, together with those of the High Courts of the Newstates of America and those of the highest courts of the Newstates. It shall meet annually, or at the call of the Principal Justice, to consider the state of the Judiciary and such other matters as may be laid before it. It shall also meet at the call of the Convener to nominate three candidates for the Principal Justiceship whenever a vacancy shall occur. From these nominees the Senate shall choose the one having the most votes.
SECTION 4… The Principal Justice, unless the Senate object to any, shall appoint a Judicial Council of five members to serve during his incumbency. He shall designate a senior member who shall preside in his absence. It shall be the duty of the Council, under the direction of the Principal Justice, to study the courts in operation, to prepare codes of ethics to be observed by members, and to suggest changes in procedure. The Council may ask the advice of the Judicial Assembly. It shall also be a duty of the Council, as hereinafter provided, to suggest Constitutional amendments when they appear to be necessary; and it shall also draft revisions if they shall be required. Further it shall examine, and from time to time cause to be revised, civil and criminal codes; these, when approved by the Judicial Assembly, shall be in effect throughout the nation. SECTION 5… The Principal Justice shall have a term of eleven years; but if at any time the incumbent resign or be disabled from continuing in office, as may be determined by the Senate, replacement shall be by the senior member of the Judicial Council until a new selection be made. After six years the Assembly may provide, by a two-thirds vote, for discontinuance in office, and a successor shall then be chosen.
SECTION 6…The Principal Justice may suspend members of any court for incapacity or violation of rules; and the separation shall be final if a majority of the Council agree. For each court the Principal Justice shall, from time to time, appoint a member who shall preside.
SECTION 7…../A presiding judge may decide, with the concurrence of the senior judge, that there may be pretrial proceedings, that criminal trials shall be conducted by either investigatory or adversary proceedings, and whether there shall be a jury and what the number of jurors shall be; but investigatory proceedings shall require a bench of three.
SECTION 8*…In deciding on the concordance of statutes with the Constitution, the Supreme Court shall return to the House of Representatives such as it cannot construe. If the House fail to make return within ninety days the Court may interpret.
SECTION 9… The Principal Justice, or the President, may grant pardons or reprieves.
SECTION 10… The High Courts shall have thirteen members; but nine members, chosen by then senior justices from time to time, shall constitute a court. The justices on leave shall be subject to recall. Other courts shall have nine members; but seven, chosen by their senior, shall constitute a court. All shall be in continuous session except for recesses approved by the Principal Justice.
SECTION 11… The Principal Justice, with the Council, may advise the Senate, when requested, concerning the appropriateness of measures approved by the House of Representatives; and may also advise the President, when requested, on matters he may refer for consultation.
SECTION 12… It shall be for other branches to accept and to enforce judicial decrees.
SECTION 13… The High Court of Appeals may select applications for further consideration by the Supreme Court of decisions reached by other courts, including those of the Newstates. If it agree that there be a constitutional issue it may make preliminary judgment to be reviewed without hearing, and finally, by the Supreme Court.
SECTION 14… The supreme Court may decide:
a. Whether, in litigation coming to it on appeal, constitutional provisions have been violated or standards have not been met.
b. On the application of constitutional provisions to suits involving the Newstates.
c. Whether international law, as recognized in treaties, United Nations agreements, or arrangements with other nations, has been ignored or violated. d. Other causes involving the interpretation of constitutional provisions; except that in holding any branch to have exceeded its powers the decision shall be suspended until the Judicial Court shall have determined whether, in order to avoid confrontation, procedures for amendment of the Constitution are appropriate. If amendatory proceedings are instituted, decision shall await the outcome.
SECTION 15… The Courts of the Newstates shall have initial jurisdiction in cases arising under their laws except those involving the Newstate itself or those reserved for national courts by a rule of the Principal Justice with the Judicial Council.
ARTICLE IX GENERAL PROVISIONS
SECTION 1…Qualifications for participation in democratic procedures as a citizen, and eligibility for office, shall be subject to repeated study and redefinition; but any change in qualification or eligibility shall become effective only if not disapproved by the Congress./* For this purpose a permanent Citizenship and Qualifications Commission shall be constituted, four members to be appointed by the President, three by the Convener of the Senate, three by the Speaker of the House, and three by the Principal Justice. Vacancies shall be filled as they occur. The members shall choose a chairman; they shall have suitable assistants and accommodations; and they may have other occupations. Recommendations of the commission shall be presented to the President and shall be transmitted to the House of Representatives with comments. They shall have a preferred place on the calendar and, if approved, shall be in effect.
ECTION 2… Areas necessary for the uses of government may be acquired at its valuation and may be maintained as the public interest may require. Such areas shall have self-government in matters of local concern.
SECTION 3…The President may negotiate for the acquisition of areas outside the Newstates of America, and, if the Senate approve, may provide for their organization as Possessions or Territories.
SECTION 4… The President may make agreements with other organized peoples for a relation other than full membership in the Newstates of America. They may become citizens and may participate in the selection of officials. They may receive assistance for their development or from the National Sharing fund if they conform to its requirements; and they may serve in civilian or military services, but only as volunteers. They shall be represented in the House of Representatives by members elected at large, their number proportional to their constituencies; but each shall have at least one; and each shall in the same way choose one permanent member of the Senate.
SECTION 5… The President, the Vice-Presidents, and members of the legislative houses shall in all cases except treason, felony, and breach of the peace be exempt from penalty for anything them may say while pursuing public duties; but the Judicial Council may make restraining rules.
SECTION 6… Except as otherwise provided by this Constitution, each legislative house shall establish its requirement for membership and may make rules for the conduct of members, including conflicts of interest, providing its own disciplines for their infraction.
SECTION 7* No Newstate shall interfere with officials of the Newstates of America in the performance of their duties, and all shall give full faith and credit to the Acts of other Newstates and of the Newstates of America. *SECTION 8… Public funds shall be expended only as authorized in this constitution.
ARTICLE X GOVERNMENTAL ARRANGEMENTS
SECTION 1… Offices of the Newstates of America shall be those named in this Constitution, including those of the legislative houses and others authorized by law to be appointed; they shall be compensated, and none may have other paid occupation unless they be excepted by law; none shall occupy more than one position in government; and no gift or favor shall be accepted if in any way related to official duty. No income from former employments or associations shall continue for their benefits; but their properties may be put in trust and managed without their intervention during continuance in office. Hardships under this rule may be considered by the Court of Rights and Duties, and exceptions may be made with due regard to the general intention.
SECTION 2… The President, the Vice-Presidents, and the Principal Justice shall have households appropriate to their duties. The President, the Vice-Presidents, the Principal Justice, the Chairman of the Planning Board, the Regulator, the Watchkeeper, and the Overseer shall have salaries fixed by law and continued for life; but if they become members of the Senate, they shall have senatorial compensation and shall conform to senatorial requirements. Justices of the High Courts shall have no term; and their salaries shall be two-thirds that of the Principal Justice; they and members of the Judicial Council, unless they shall have become Senators, shall be permanent members of the Judiciary and shall be available for assignment by the Principal Justice. Salaries for members of the Senate shall be the same as for Justices of the High Court of Appeals.
SECTION 3… Unless otherwise provided herein, officials designated by the head of a branch as sharers in policymaking may be appointed by him with the President’s concurrence and unless the Senate shall object.
SECTION 4… There shall be administrators: a. for executive offices and official households, appointed by authority of the President; b. for the national courts, appointed by the Principal Justice; c. for the Legislative Branch, selected by a committee of members from each house (chosen by the Convener and the Speaker), three from the House of Representatives and four from the Senate. Appropriations shall be made to them; but those for the Presidency shall not be reduced during his term unless with his consent; and those for the Judicial Branch shall not be reduced during five years succeeding their determination, unless with the consent of the Principal Justice.
SECTION 5…protective Service to guard the President, the Vice-Presidents, the Principal Justice, and other officials whose safety may be at hazard; and there shall be a Protector appointed by and responsible to a standing committee of the Senate. Protected officials shall be guided by procedures approved by the committee.
SECTION 6… A suitable contingency fund shall be made available to the President for purposes defined by law.
SECTION 7… The Senate shall try officers of government other than legislators when such officers are impeached by a two-thirds vote of the House of Representatives for conduct prejudicial to the public interest. If Presidents or Vice-Presidents are to be tried, the Senate, as constituted, shall conduct the trial. Judgments shall not extend beyond removal from office and disqualification for holding further office; but the convicted official shall be liable to further prosecutions.
SECTION 8… Members of legislative houses may be impeached by the Judicial Council; but for trials it shall be enlarged to seventeen by Justices of the High Courts appointed by the Principal Justice. If convicted, members shall be expelled and be ineligible for future public office; and they shall also be liable for trial as citizens.
ARTICLE XI AMENDMENT
SECTION 1…It being the special duty of the Judicial Council to formulate and suggest amendments to this Constitution, it shall, from time to time, make proposals, through the Principal Justice, to the Senate. The Senate, if it approve, and if the President agree, shall instruct the Overseer to arrange at the next national election for submission of the amendment to the electorate.
If not disapproved by a majority, it shall become part of this Constitution. If rejected, it may be restudied and a new proposal submitted./* It shall be the purpose of the amending procedure to correct deficiencies in the Constitution, to extend it when new responsibilities require, and to make government responsible to needs of the people, */making use of advances in managerial competence/* and establishing security and stability; also to preclude changes in the Constitution resulting from interpretation.
SECTION 2… When this Constitution shall have been in effect for twenty- five years the Overseer shall ask, by referendum whether a new Constitution shall be prepared. If a majority so decide, the Council, making use of such advice as may be available, and consulting those who have made complaint, shall prepare a new draft for submission at the next election. */If not disapproved by a majority it shall be in effect. If disapproved it shall be redrafted and resubmitted with such changes as may be then appropriate to the circumstances, and it shall be submitted to the voters at the following election. If not disapproved by a majority it shall be in effect. If disapproved it shall be restudied and resubmitted.
ARTICLE XII TRANSITION
SECTION 1… The president is authorized to assume such powers, make such appointments, and use such funds as are necessary to make this Constitution effective as soon as possible after acceptance by a referendum he may initiate. SECTION 2… Such members of the Senate as may be at once available shall convene and, if at least half, shall constitute sufficient membership while others are being added. They shall appoint an Overseer to arrange for electoral organization and elections for the offices of government; but the President and Vice-Presidents shall serve out their terms and then become members of the Senate. At that time the presidency shall be constituted as provided in the Constitution.
SECTION 3… Until each indicated change in the government shall have been completed the provisions of the existing Constitution and the organs of government shall be in effect.
SECTION 4…All operations of the national government shall cease as they are replaced by those authorized under this Constitution. The President shall determine when replacement is complete. The President shall cause to be constituted an appropriate commission to designate existing laws inconsistent with this Constitution, and they shall be void; also the commission shall assist the President and the legislative houses in the formulating of such laws as may be consistent with the Constitution and necessary to its implementation. SECTION 5… For establishing Newstates’ boundaries a commission of thirteen, appointed by the President, shall make recommendations within one year. For this purpose the members may take advice and commission studies concerning resources, population, transportation, communication, economic and social arrangements, and such other conditions as may be significant. The President shall transmit the commission’s report to the Senate. After entertaining, if convenient, petitions for revision, the Senate shall report whether the recommendations are satisfactory but the President shall decide whether they shall be accepted or shall be returned for revision. Existing states shall not be divided unless metropolitan areas extending over more than one state are to be included in one Newstate, or unless other compelling circumstances exist; and each Newstate shall possess harmonious regional characteristics. The Commission shall continue while the Newstates make adjustments among themselves and shall have jurisdiction in disputes arising among them. *SECTION 6* Constitutions of the Newstates shall be established as arranged by the Judicial Council and the Principal Justice. These procedures shall be as follows: Constitutions shall be drafted by the highest courts of the Newstates. There shall then be a convention of one hundred delegates chosen in special elections in a procedure approved by the Overseer. If the Constitution be not rejected, the Principal Justice, advised by the Judicial Council, shall promulgate a Constitution and initiate revisions to be submitted for approval at a time he shall appoint. If it again be rejected he shall promulgate another, taking account of objections, and it shall be in effect. A Constitution, once in effect, shall be valid for twenty-five years as herein provided. *SECTION 7* Until Governors and legislatures of the Newstates are seated, their governments shall continue, except that the President may appoint temporary Governors to act as executives until succeeded by those regularly elected. These Governors shall succeed to the executive functions of the states as they become one of the Newstates of America. *SECTION 8* The indicated appointments, elections, and other arrangements shall be made with all deliberate speed. *SECTION 9* The first Judicial Assembly for selecting a register for candidates for the Principal Justiceship of the Newstates of America shall be called by the incumbent Chief Justice immediately upon ratification. *SECTION 10* Newstates electing by referendum not to comply with recommendations of the Boundary Commission, as approved by the Senate, shall have deducted from taxes collected by the Newstates of America for transmission to them a percentage equal to the loss in efficiency from failure to comply. Estimates shall be made by the Chancellor of Financial Affairs and approved by the President; but the deduction shall not be less than 7 percent. *SECTION 11* When this Constitution has been implemented the President may delete by proclamation appropriate parts of this article.
DOCUMENT NUMBER TWO
THE PROPOSED CONSTITUTION FOR THE ‘NEWSTATES OF NORTH AMERICA’ An analysis by E. Stanley Rittenhouse This new constitution would replace the present U.S. Constitution and would dissolve the States as we know them into Newstates, “each comprising no less than 5 percent of the whole population.” This new constitution with its regional government would bring about an oligarchy at the expense of our Constitutional Republic. This form of dictatorship that is planned for America would bring into even more prominence and power the crowd who wants a “New World Order.” This proposed constitution is, in itself, a vehicle for the transition from our proven, tried and true, divinely-ordained Constitution to the New World Order that man, in his own efforts, hopes to impose upon mankind. The first eight words of the preamble clearly spell out all of the above. “So that we may join in common endeavors” assumes that everyone wants to support their endeavors to destroy America’s sovereignty, states rights and the individual’s God- given liberty and freedom. Should this be accomplished, the states would be abolished in favor of regions known as “Newstates.” By their assumption, the initiative is taken and the momentum gained. The “common endeavors” in this case is the destruction of our U.S. Constitution so as to replace it with a dictatorship. The new would have the form and appearance of the old but there the similarity would end. The Newstates of America Constitution is merely a form of the old in order to pacify those still remembering the liberty that is guaranteed. The new constitution is a bridge, a part of the hopefully peaceful transition from a Constitutional Republic to an oligarchic world dictatorship. The mere fact that this new constitution is to be in effect only 25 years and that many opportunities are provided to revise and rewrite it in those years, indicates the role of transition. Article XI, Section 2 declares: “When this Constitution shall have been in effect for twenty-five years the Overseer shall ask, by referendum whether a new Constitution shall be prepared.” And should those in power be defeated in the case of amending their new constitution, they won’t take no for an answer. To quote Article XI, Section 1: “If rejected (that which they proposed), it may be restudied and a new proposal submitted.” So evidently, it is not possible for the people to totally reject that which the appointed Principal Justice and that which the appointed Senate proposes. The word “emergency” appears frequently in the proposed Constitution but is never mentioned in our U.S. Constitution. Consequently, an “emergency” is used to impose new dictates– which could only be accomplished at the expense of the U.S. citizen’s liberty. Much of the language is vague leaving it wide open to various interpretations–and of course the ones in power would control the courts as our judicial system would be restructured to favor the continuance of power. This would be accomplished by eliminating the present checks and balances so established within the present Constitution. The legislative, judicial and executive branches would be replaced with six branches, all designed and structured to perpetuate those in power. Article XII spells out clearly the awesome dictatorial power that will be put into the hands of a few. Section 1 states: “The President is authorized to assume such powers, make such appointments, and use such funds as are necessary to make this Constitution effective as soon as possible after acceptance by a referendum he may initiate.” Section 4 says, “the president shall cause to be constituted an appropriate commission to designate existing laws inconsistent with this Constitution, and they shall be void.” The new order would bring about land use–the federal control or “use” of private property. (And we all know there can be no human rights without property rights!) The Newstates Constitution declares: “No property shall be taken without compensation.” By leaving the word “just” out, the compensation becomes very arbitrary and the final decision would rest with the government. Article VI, B, Section 16, states: “To acquire property and improvements for public use at costs to be fixed, if necessary, by the Court of Claims.” The Court of Claims will be made up of appointees. In order for the One-Worlders to maintain themselves in power, the key positions would be filled by appointees with the authority as well as the power being given to these unelected bureaucrats. Such officials as the Overseer, the Watchkeeper, the National Regulator, the Intendant, the Principal Justice and his appointed members of all national courts, the Public Custodian, the chairman of the National Planning Board, Chancellors of External, Financial, Legal & Military Affairs and the appointed Senate, to name a few will be the unelected. This approach would tend to continually bring to power only those of like mind. This is completely contrary to the attitude and approach our Founding Fathers had back in 1789 when writing the U.S. Constitution. Their concern was with the individual, his life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness; certainly not with an obsession of bringing more power to themselves and perpetuating themselves in power. The fact that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely still applies today as it did then and should make us eternally vigilant against such a trend ever developing toward absolute power. Article I, Section 1, states: “Freedom of expression of communication, of movement, of assembly or of petition shall not be abridged except in declared emergency.” In other words, all freedom is dependent upon whether the government would declare an emergency or not. But freedom is a right not to be revoked; they make it a privilege and at the mercy of their whim. This would be government by men, not by law. As this constitution states throughout, so much is dependent on certain conditions which can be determined at a later date, “Except in declared emergency;” “except in the interest of national security;” “Existing states may continue and may have the status of Newstates if the Boundary Commission, hereinafter provided, shall so decide;” “except they be approved;” “unless authorized;” “shall conform to his regulation;” etc., all point out that the form of government proposed by this document would be very arbitrary and dictatorial with the individual being forced to yield to his government. The result would be very little individual liberty. Article I, B, Section 8 would establish federal gun control and at the same time the dissolution of our 2nd Amendment which guarantees the citizen the right to bear arms. This proposed new government would control the elections. Political parties would need the approval of the Overseer and elections would be controlled by controlling the spending; this, in turn, would control the legislature. The club of Revenue Sharing would also be in effect. “If governments of the Newstates fail to carry out fully their constitutional duties, their officials shall be warned and may be required by the Senate, on the recommendations of the Watchkeeper, to forfeit revenues for the Newstates of America.” (Art II, Sec 15). This new constitution establishes the President with a term of nine years. This would make the government still less accountable to the people. There no longer would be a competitive, free-enterprise system but a “planned economy.” And the planners would be appointed by the President. This constitution would seek to dictate that the interests of America not be put first. Article IV, Section 13 & 14 declares: “In making plans, there shall be due regard to the interests of other nations and such cooperation with their intentions as may be approved by the Board. “There may also be cooperation with international agencies and such contributions to their work as are not disapproved by the President.” In regard to taxes, the President would be the tax czar, a virtual dictator. “To assist in the maintenance of economic stability, the President may be authorized to alter rates by executive order.” Article VI, B, Section 9d. The economic dictatorship is also promoted in Article VII, the Regulatory Branch, Section 1 declares that the “National Regulator…shall make and administer rules for the conduct of all economic enterprises.” But “they” always look out for their own. Section 3 states: “Under procedures approved by the Board, the Regulator shall charter all corporations or enterprises except those exempted because of size or other characteristics, or those supervised by the Chancellor of Financial affairs, or the intendant…” One wonders what characteristics would be sufficient to escape the hand of the Regulator? Section 10: “The Regulator shall make rules for and shall supervise marketplaces for goods and services.” The law of supply and demand would come under the heel of the bureaucrat. The free-enterprise system that has provided the prosperity and level of living that is the envy and standard of the world would be abandoned by these international-socialists promoting the scheme and conspiracy of a socialistic, dictatorial economic system that has proven throughout the history of mankind, to be disfunctional, non-workable and a total failure. Why, you may ask? This whole document and what it represents is a move toward a centralization of power so that the few may control the many. “The President may make agreements with OTHER ORGANIZED PEOPLES for a relation OTHER THAN FULL MEMBERSHIP in the Newstates of America. They may become citizens and may PARTICIPATE IN THE SELECTION OF OFFICIALS. They may RECEIVE ASSISTANCE for their development or or from the National Sharing Fund if they conform to its requirements; and they may serve in civilian or military services, BUT ONLY AS VOLUNTEERS. They shall be REPRESENTED IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES BY MEMBERS ELECTED AT LARGE, their number proportional to their constituencies; but each shall have at least one; and each shall in the same way choose one permanent member of the Senate.” The [capitalized] emphases are added and they speak for themselves. This document would put America at the mercy of the United Nations by recognizing U.N. agreements on par with our treaties (Article VIII, Section 14c). This would open the door to the Genocide Treaty with evils too numerous to list here. When a government is highly centralized, it is also highly vulnerable. It is an efficient structure for takeover by a determined minority. When there is decentralization and the power of the government truly rests with its citizens, to capture a part only provides a threat to the whole but does not necessarily mean a total loss. This system of checks and balances which we enjoy under the U.S. Constitution provides the opportunity of correcting the wrong, throwing the rascals out and preserving the Union. The name itself says it all, the United States of America, not a collection of federal regions controlled and run by the unelected elite. In diversification of authority and power, there is security. States’ rights themselves provide that service and when united in a Union provide a formidable structure against attack from without and subversion from within. To weaken that structure, the states and their rights must be dissolved. The Newstates (regions) and this infamous constitution would weaken the Union and make us vulnerable to these vultures who want America for their own. Certain powerful forces hope to replace the freedoms guaranteed in our Constitution by their own dictatorship–a cleverly disguised dictatorship. It has been planned to resemble superficially the government we have now, so that we will not recognize it for what it is–until too late. They are using every propaganda trick at their command to make us lower our guard. For years they have been working through groups too numerous to list, orchestrating their efforts to force a “New Constitution” on us while the people of America slumber, unaware of what is happening. In 1964 a tax-exempt foundation, the far left, internationalist “Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions,” an offshoot of the multibillion dollar Ford Foundation, began writing a “New Constitution.” It took ten years and hundreds of thousands of tax-free dollars to write. The final version was prepared under the leadership of Rexford G. Tugwell, well-known in the 1930’s as one of FDR’s “brain- trusters.” The “Newstates Constitution” is a blueprint for the slavery of the American people. It is a document you should know and understand to comprehend the conspiracy that powerful forces in America have entered into in order to snap the manacles of an international dictatorship on the arms and legs of America. This 32-page document contains, in addition to the complete text of the “Newstates Constitution,” a review by Col. Curtis B. Dall, Chairman of Liberty Lobby, and a commentary by E. Stanley Rittenhouse, Liberty Lobby’s Legislative Aide. Colonel Dall is a former investment banker who has been connected with the federal banking-political complex at the highest levels. He is also a well-known author and lecturer.
L I B E R T Y L O B B Y (202) 546-5611 300 Independence Ave., S.E. Washington, D.C. 20003
DOCUMENT NUMBER THREE
A Review of the Proposed Constitutional Model for the Newstates of America By Col. Curtis B. Dall *Opening Comments* This document was “hatched” in the Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions in Santa Barbara, California, under the direction of Rexford Tugwell, working with scores of collaborators for about ten years. It is largely the distillation of a book written by him, entitled, “The Emerging Constitution,” published in 1974 by Harper and Row, for a small, select group of readers. It contains twelve Articles and is offered as a substitute for our time-honored, magnificent Constitution. Tugwell’s document would foist upon unalerted Americans a new, deceitfully worded “Constitution” tooled up for a Police State under a Dictator! Rex Tugwell, I can readily recall, was a well-known, Far-Out Liberal of the New Deal Era, a friend of Nelson Rockefeller who, reportedly, is also much interested in the promotion of this subversive new “Constitutional Model” with its varied overtones for a Dictatorship. Just why should any group of Americans take it upon themselves to gratuitously present to the American people a NEW Constitution to replace the one which as served the country so outstandingly over the years? Why attempt to tear down and overthrow our form of government by setting up, in its place, a Soviet-type, Godless Dictatorship, depriving the Individual American of Free Enterprise and personal Liberty? Evidently, it is because a few super-rich men, devoid of loyalty to country, expect, along with some of their Satellite Corporations, to profit greatly by assisting in the development of a One-World, Socialist State which they expect to control. Their subversive planning will ultimately fail, once loyal Americans understand their monstrous plan. I have read Dr. Peter Beter’s very penetrating, brilliant analysis of this proposed new Constitution, which he wrote as an aroused lawyer. This review of mine will represent the point of view of an aroused layman, emphasizing certain “key points” for those who are unsuspecting, and, therefore, unalerted–those who find it hard to believe that a few wealthy, politically- perverted-minded individuals, and their well-kept stooges, would stoop so low as to stick a knife in the back of their fellow- Americans and attempt to destroy the fruits of 200 years of struggle and great achievement here. A struggle for the advancement and well-being of Free Men, in our enlightened, Constitutional Republic. This abortive “New Constitution” pretends to follow the language of our own Constitution. Lying just beneath some sweet- sounding, misleading words, however, are potential Subversion, Malfeasance, and perhaps, Treason. Tugwell, the individual, and all sponsors of this Plan should be tried by the Courts and punished for their adjudged crimes against their country and their fellow-citizens, and the charters of all sponsoring and contributing Foundations voided. For those who, with intent, have arrogantly attempted to turn back the clock and aim to plunge us all into miserable servitude, just what punishment is adequate? These comments are made to provide a preface for my review, which follows: *Preamble* (a) It welcomes the future “in good order.” Just what does that really mean? (b) “To create an adequate and self-repairing Government.” If our present Government needs some minor repairing, why not carefully consider the matter for possible improvement? Why even consider a new form of Government that might be “self- repairing”–by command coming from a Dictator? Why change the entire form of a highly successful Government for free people to one controlled by iron-clad Dictatorship? Note. “We, the people, do establish the Newstates of America, herein provided to be ours–” Well, what would we have then? What, in contrast to that which we have now? Today, we have a noble document, far, far removed from a “concensus for Collectivism”–a dangerous phrase which we occasionally hear from Internationally-influenced speakers in their efforts to further the aims of the super-rich Corporate Socialists. The emphasis in the Preamble, and throughout, is to favor BIG Government and down-grade The People. This is the complete reverse of our own Constitution. *Rights and Responsibilities Article 1. “A” Rights.* Section 1. Note the “exception.” Who is to define “the emergency?” Section 2. Another “exception.” Also note the word, “Privileged.” Section 3. This is vague, but carefully phrased. Section 5. “The Court of Rights and Responsibilities” can decide whether or not you have been guilty of “discrimination”– This is harassment. Section 6. What determines “eligibility?” Section 8. “The practice of religion shall be privileged”– a very dangerous statement. This could deny our present Constitutional Right to the “free exercise thereof.” Section 10. Note “National Sharing Fund”–Quite a “gimmick.” Section 11. Who is to define the “appropriate tests of eligibility” for education? Section 12. In referring to “compensation,” the word, “just,” is flagrantly omitted. A serious and ominous omission. Section 15. Who is to declare the “emergency?” *Article 1 “B” Responsibilities.* Section 1. “A corresponding responsibility” is vague, and could be quite dangerous. Section 6. “Fairness to all”–sounds nice, but very vague. Section 8. Citizens shall be deprived of their arms. This is the age-old “gag” of all tyrants, their favorite technique, to first deprive all law-abiding citizens of their means of protection from assault. Section 11. Aimed to “muzzle” Retired Officers of the Armed Forces. Why. *Article II. “The Newstates”* Section 1. “There shall be Newstates”–This is very subversive, inflammatory and communistic. Note “The Boundary Commission” and its extensive proposed powers “to decide.” This is complete Regimentation. Section 2. NO. Section 3. NO. Too much “planning” (to submerge the individual.) Section 4. Note “electoral Overseer.” Section 11. So-called “States Rights” are subject to “Emergency” rulings by the Governors, with the approval of the Senate of the Newstates of America, so all States’ Rights hang on a very slender thread. Hence, they are down-graded. Section 12. Suggests a Police State. Section 13. Again, “The Boundary Commission” appears, with firm control over the “Newstates.” Section 15. Looks very much like a Police State set up. A club over the “Newstates” wielded by the “Watchkeeper.” *Article III. The Electoral Branch* Section 1. This is something new for greater control over the people. Section 4. Note, “Recognition by the Overseer.” Section 5-8. “The Overseer shall promulgate rules for party conduct…” Section 11. “Expenses of the Electoral Branch” to be met by an added 1% to the net taxable income of taxpayers…for disposition by the Overseer.” Sounds, again, like a Police State. *Article IV. The Planning Branch* Section 1. “There shall be a Planning Branch to formulate and administer plans and to prepare budgets…” Evidently, the individual is not expected to do any planning on his own account. His “day” is supposed to be over. Section 2. “National Planning Board of 15 members appointed by the President for terms of one to 15 years…the president shall appoint a Chairman to serve for 15 years.” Quite an important appointment. Section 5. “…(these plans) to represent national intentions tempered by the appraisal of possibilities.” This is intentionally vague; a form of “Soviet-type” Regimentation, pointing to a loss of Freedom for the Individual. “National life,” is a reference to a “Super State.” Section 8. More Regimentation. Section 9. “There shall be submissions…” This is to control, or actually kill Free Enterprise: the destruction of personal liberty. Section 10. “Violations…shall be at the risk of the venturer, and there shall be no recourse…” This is a pure Police State set-up.. Section 14. This is intended to be far-reaching and is very dangerous. It is a well-concealed “Give-Away” to help promote “International Agencies.” It amounts to a “Blank Check” for Foreign Aid. *Article V. The Presidency.* Chancellor of Financial Affairs… Here is great power, not spelled out, but a sort of “Blank Check.” Emphasis is on foreign nations, but no reference as to how we can improve our present bankers’ system of privileged thievery of national assets. No mention at all. Very dangerous and quite unacceptable, to even contemplate. Chancelor of Military Affairs…very dangerous: “emergency” appears, again. Section 10. “Treaties or agreements with other nations, negotiated under the President’s authority, shall be in effect unless objected to by a majority of the senate within ninety days.” Too much power in the hands of the President. He is to be the strong man. Section 11. This means complete control–so necessary for a Dictator. Section 13. “There shall be a Public Custodian, appointed by the President, who shall have charge of properties belonging to the government…building, construction and rentals…” (and may have other duties). The familiar “blank check” treatment, again. Section 14. There “Shall be an Intendant” to supervise Offices for Intelligence and Investigation also “an Office of Emergency Organization.” The “Intendant will also “charter non- profit Corporations or Foundations” for useful public purposes” … “exempt from taxation.” Useful to whom? Why exempt from taxation? Firm Regimentation. Section 15. “The Intendant shall … be a counselor for the coordination of scientific and cultural experiments and for studies within the government and elsewhere.” Note that word, “elsewhere.” *Article VI. The Legislative Branch. “A” The Senate* Section 1. Note “if they so desire”…Who are “they?” All hand picked from a top group around the President. Section 2. Retirement can be voluntary. Life membership. Section 3. “…elect as presiding officer a Convener” “for two years” Section 4. A quorum will be 60% or more. Section 6. “The Senate may ask advice from the Principal Justice concerning the constitutionality of measures before it.” Section 8. “In time of present or prospective danger caused by cataclysm, by attack, or by insurrection, the Senate may declare a national emergency” “and may authorize the President to take appropriate action. If the Senate be dispersed, and no quorum available, the President may proclaim the emergency…” When the Senate is dispersed would be a good time for the President to declare an “emergency.” Section 10. Note the word, “abroad.” This is more veiled international meddling in other nations’ affairs to further the financial interests of the wealthy International Political Capitalists and their large industrial satellites. Section 11. “The Senate shall elect, or may remove, a National Watchkeeper (who)…shall gather and organize information concerning the…competence and integrity of governmental agencies and their personnel, as well as their continued usefulness…and suggest the need for new and expanded services…The Convener shall present the Watchkeeper’s findings to the Senate.” Very fancy! *Article VI. The legislative Branch. “B” The House of Representatives.* Section 1. “The House of Representatives shall be the original law-making body of the Newstates of America.” Section 2. “It shall be a duty to implement the provisions of this constitution…” d. “To assist in the maintenance of economic stability, the President may be authorized to alter rates by executive order.” This clearly bears the mark of a contemplated Dictatorship. 5. Very wide-sweeping and vague, but all-encompassing. 8. This is also very “fancy” and far-reaching. What is “world order” and who determines it? Here again, the benefit is for a wealthy few who are to be groomed to be our appointed World Policemen. The people are to bear the great expense of this treasonous policy aimed at the destruction of the freedom- loving people of this country. 10. This is clearly meddling in other nations’ affairs so that some Super Capitalists can thereby extract a profit. This is sheer, self-serving socialist nonsense on an international level to help the international-type Rockefeller- Group-controlled corporations. 11. Vague, of course, and dangerous. Who defines “adequate” and “equal?” 13. Notice how quietly the word, “archives,” appears? Yes, keep the public in the dark. Police State technique. We want none of it. 15. “To conserve natural resources by purchase…or by regulation. 16. This is very dangerous and could readily become confiscatory in character. 18. What is “adequate?” 19. “To provide for the maintenance of armed forces.” This most important matter is covered in only eight words. No mention of “adequate” armed forces. No indication as to what way the forces are to be organized and developed. This is a deliberate, crafty, “brush-off” for hidden, deceitful reasons. *Article VII The Regulatory Branch* Section 3. Note that the “Big Boys” will be immune on account of size. This is the planned “apparatus” of a Dictator. Does the “guiding hand” of Rex Tugwell’s friend, Nelson Rockefeller show here? Section 7. It will be necessary to “play ball” with “The Regulator.” Section 8. A labyrinth of Rules. Section 9. What about the interest of the citizens, which appears to be deliberately over-looked? Section 10. This means FOOD–and don’t forget that very effective “tool,” called “Rationing.” Section 11. More and More Rules. Section 12. Still more Rules! *Article VIII. The Judicial Branch* Section 1. Quite a galaxy of Courts on the National level. Pity an abused citizen–he could readily become a “non- person,” as in Soviet jargon. Section 14. “The Supreme Court may decide: c. Whether international law…has been ignored or violated.” Here, the Principal Justice is the real boss, along with the Judiciary Council. *Article IX General Provisions* Section 1. Apparently the Congress will define the qualifications of Citizenship. Mr. Tugwell has wandered much too far. Section 2. Here, again, the emphasis is in Government, not the Individual. Section 3. “The President may negotiate for the acquisition of areas outside…” What say the People? Section 4. This is indeed fancy Dictator stuff. Section 5. They must be afraid of the people’s reaction to insist on a “blank check” to say what-ever they desire to say, true or otherwise. Section 7. This the mark of Big, central government. *Article X Governmental Arrangements* Section 2. These are the “top dogs” in a Centralized Socialist State set-up, far removed and different from what we now have. Section 6. Who is “protecting” the People from them? *Article XI Amendments* Section 1. It is admitted here, by “Tugwell and Company,” that there may be “deficiencies” in this constitution, but any unfavorable “interpretations” of it are precluded. A Dictator will, naturally, institute all “changes.” Section 2. Twenty-five years, in this case, would be a very long time. The People–not the “Judicial Council” should suggest new amendments. This is a slick, deceitful section, made to “read good” but to enhance so-called “managerial competence”–a tricky phrase. Also, it is a slap at our own Constitution, in referring to the word “interpretation.” I wonder, why do we need a New Constitution and New Amendments to correct “deficiencies?” If our own Constitution needs any trimming, let the People reflect their considered views concerning it–and not, as in Tugwell’s “monstrocity,” have a Tyrannical, Godless Dictatorship foisted upon us to further establish and enrich the One World Corporate Socialists. *Article XII Transition* Section 1. Referendum, in itself, if conducted honestly, is a reasonable procedure, but it can readily become the “tool” of deceitful sponsors for their self-serving purposes. Section 4. “The President”–so-called, to hide a more frank title. Section 5. Note the words, “adjustments” and “disputes.” We know that our forebears gave much time and great thought to this identical matter between 1778 and 1789. Could it be that the observations provided by Mr. Tugwell and his numerous colleagues in the mis-named “Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions” does not go back that far? Section 6. Here “the cart” is deliberately placed before “the horse”–meaning that Freedom and Liberty should properly start with the People. Be alerted, Fellow Citizens. Section 7. This is a very dangerous situation which could occur in the area of so-called “Transition” because it could be deliberately “bogged down.” An aspiring Dictator could create a chaotic situation in this country which would play directly into his hand. Ponder this. Section 8. Here we go again. Hurry, hurry, hurry–to fool the people. Section 10. This is a clear picture of “Strong-Arm” Dictatorial methods. Comply–or else! Section 11. In this the President is given a free hand to delete appropriate parts of this Article by mere proclamation. Just what does “appropriate” mean? Who determines this? Historically, this whole Tugwell promotion is not new at all. It points to the oldest kind of government in the world’s history–One Man Rule–but on a world-wide scale. Informed sources have stated that talented scholars, who look for avenues of power, are often “acquired” by the sons of billionaires to show them how their immense wealth can be directed so that they can rule the world. In this instance, let’s give Rex Tugwell due credit. This program has been made possible by deliberate and successful attacks made on our time-honored Constitution by Dictator-minded “One Worlders” to confuse bemused citizens and purported “Representatives” on Capitol Hill and in our various State Governments. Many feel that the most appropriate and effective way to confront Tugwell and the leading collaborators of this proposed subversive “Constitution” would be via the scaffold. IT IS HIGH TIME TO “CLEAN HOUSE” AND RESET OUR BELABORED SHIP OF STATE ON A SOUND, CONSTRUCTIVE COURSE. LET THE “CHIPS” FALL WHERE THEY MAY. CONCLUDING COMMENTS I have said before, this subversive “New Constitution” is not new at all. History’s pages portray the oldest form of government known to man as “One Man Rule.” The main thrust of Tugwell’s deceitful document makes one realize that a few, ruthless, misguided men of great wealth have lost all social and civic balance due to their possessing a vast call upon real wealth, through the medium of exchange called “money.” They should be hauled before the courts and punished for subversion, possible malfeasance, and even treason. Fellow Citizens, if your American Citizenship, and thus, your sovereignty, is not worth defending, at all costs–as something of great value; a shining heritage handed down to you by the bold efforts of your enlightened ancestors–then you and I, with our families, will continue our rapid descent on the internationalist-constructed toboggan slide to obscurity. We have been unsuspectingly placed on this slippery slide by cunning One-World-Order Forces. Today, in our Nation’s Bi-Centennial Year, you and I should ponder this deeply. I say it is high time to “clean house,” in and out of government; to clean out, by all legal means, the subversive elements of One-World-Order ideology, brought here from abroad; the, build anew. We can do it, and we must. However, to survive as Free Men, as the masters of our individual destiny, we should adhere, strictly, to the Articles of our matchless Constitution. Let’s get started. Although many Americans have been brainwashed via the intensive down-grading mis-education program foisted upon us by a few wealthy Corporate Socialists to alter our form of government for their profit, by control of monetary policies, vast raw materials, and even peoples’ lives, we must boldly confront this sinister threat and ACT. Repulse this secretive, well-financed wave of Subversion before it becomes too late to act. I recall that my Father-in-Law, Franklin Roosevelt, once stated, “Nothing happens in Politics by chance. If it happens, it was planned that way.” Hence, looking closely at this Tugwell Constitution “Thing,” it did not just “happen” overnight. Far from it. What individuals secretly planned and financed it for their Dictatorial Objectives? Dare we ignore such a subversive ideological onslaught coming from a non-elected, self-appointed group? Certainly not. Are we to listen, abjectly, to the honeyed words of “Front Man” Tugwell, the leading “Monday morning Quarter-Back” on “The Center’s” team for civic planning, as we observe his efforts to pick purported “holes” in our revered Constitution? Certainly not. We must draw the battle lines, today. In so doing, let us recall that, in San Antonio, during the historic battle of the Alamo, Colonel Travis lay on a pallet, severely wounded, after days of sustained attack by vastly superior enemy forces. Drawing a line with his saber on the dirt floor of the Alamo, he said to his small force of heroic defenders, gathered about him, “All those who wish to stay with me and continue to fight, step this side of the line. Those who wish to depart, may do so now. Texas history proudly states that all of the Alamo’s defenders stepped to Col. Travis’ side of the line–to fight for Liberty. Americans can take great pride in recalling that famous war cry, “Remember the Alamo!” They can also say, referring to Greek history, “Thermopylae had its messenger of defeat; the Alamo had none.” Let us keep that faith. Let us confront and put to route these Misguided Imposters. Today, every American should “step this side of the line” to defend and restore their splendid heritage now being eroded by subversive Parasites and International Financiers. Fellow Citizens, “Remember the Alamo! Step this side of the Line!”
These are not available
EXECUTIVE ORDERS BLUEPRINT FOR DICTATORSHIP
This pamphlet documents twelve executive orders which have established a potential dictatorship over America. Control of the press, transportation, finance, the economy, labor are all provided for in these registered orders which can be invoked at any time by the President.
THE FEDERAL RESERVE AND OUR MANIPULATED DOLLAR By Martin A. Larson, Ph.D. In layman’s language the mind-boggling mysteries of the Fed explained. The nature of your money, how it is manufactured and manipulated to cause wars, depressions, inflation. The invisible empire of the multinational bankers; how they reduce kings and congresses to puppets and make productive men and women into slaves. How the Fed and the income tax operate together to impoverish the public while transferring the assets of the world to the super-rich. $4.95 per copy ================================================================= L I B E R T Y L O B B Y (202) 546-5611 300 Independence Ave., S.E. Washington, D.C. 20003 Home.
Further Research could be found at-Citizens for Better Government Click here.
April 4, 2011
The Mayoral elections received plenty of media coverage with KVOR radio also covering in great detail all candidates to include suggestions by media for voters to visit the individual web pages of each to get more information on their platforms. Here is a brief review of some of the candidates speaking and please go online to get more from several media releases available and Youtube. I have been busy with University program and all I could say is please pray for the city of Colorado Springs and our Nation for these are delicate times. In God I trust to give us good candidates that will take in consideration the need for the people to be secure in their persons, property and with the liberties which have been part of our founding. No doubt that today more than ever voters need to pay attention at the issues so we do not lose our jobs, liberties, vital neighborhoods and ability to live well with our families.
Some Random Pictures from Stargazer
Candidate for Mayor Brian Bahr was on an adoption sudden trip and here is an update with information from his site. Click Here. Yesterday the wind storm flew one of his signs in the back of the yard which must have gone over several fences and I am not superstitious but in all fairness with his trip to care for the two children here is the picture of his sign below.
March 11, 2011
Below information sent by e-mail blast from CCM-Coalition for a Conservative Mayority. FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
YOUR LAST CHANCE TO HEAR FROM
BOTH MAYORAL AND CITY COUNCIL CANDIDATES
BEFORE THE ELECTION
Come join the Mayoral and City Council Candidates Wednesday March 16th, as they share their vision for Colorado Springs. The Candidates will be asked to expand on answers to various questions asked on the Candidates Questionnaire sent earlier this month. Completed questionnaires for all the Candidates can be found at http://www.OurCityCouncil.info. The event will be moderated by Colorado Springs very own, KRDO News Channel 13 Anchor, Eric Singer.
Stargazers Theatre & Event Center
10 Parkside Drive
Colo. Springs, CO 80910
Doors Open at 5:00pm
Mayoral Candidates at 6:00pm
City Council Candidates at 7:30pm
TICKETS ARE FREE
Food and Beverages will be available for purchase so bring your whole family.
Attendance is limited to first 500 attendees. A straw poll will be taken.
Ballots for the April 5th, 2011 Municipal Election will be mailed out from March 11th to 21st to all eligible, active voters within Colorado Springs City Limits. All ballots must be returned by 7pm on April 5th, 2011 to be counted. If you are an eligible voter and do not receive a ballot in the mail by March 25th you may pick up a ballot at the City Clerk’s Office, 30 S. Nevada Ave, Suite 101, Monday through Friday 8am-5pm.
If you would like more information about this forum or would like to volunteer to help, please call Kanda Calef at 719/313-2469 or email Kanda at firstname.lastname@example.org
March 1, 2011
It is amazing how the public has been so despondent while our Nation seems to be disappearing before our very eyes. Our rule of law, basic rights, form of government, way of living, and work all changing for the worse and coming at us at once as in a perfect storm. Many in our society claim to be christian but why have most not come forward to address the seriousness of the problems that we are facing? We seem to have a government giving itself more and more dictatorial powers each day and frankly a real concern for our safety and that of our children. This has happened since our Nation enjoyed so many freedoms and population would never suspect that special interests would take hold of both political parties behind the scenes. Even elections have become very heated for anyone trying participate gets pushed back with so much nonsense and inimical fake representatives placing themselves in positions of power preaching the same pro spending and pro war agenda forgetting that which matters most which is the American people. How could we offer to help other Nations when we cannot help ourselves and even risk a total collapse of our economy and risking future suffering to the citizens? It seems that we are on a Titanic with no one at the helm who is making any sense. The citizens themselves must come forward and participate in the process for if not the chances are everything in our lives will be micro-managed to include even the air that we breathe or not. There are so many pharmaceutical products out there causing all kinds of environmental problems coming up in our water, getting people addicted and yet now more vaccines are projected to be brought to the schools and this is a real concern. What are all of these governmental agendas teaching our children? That they cannot function unless government intervenes? Are we forgetting that we are people and citizens not just consumers for mandated products that benefit those creating patents for them? How is it that so many new laws have been passed which are continually taking away our rights to choose the food or products that we want? This is a real serious problem to include not normal at all for a Constitutional form of government and the citizenry needs to wake-up, educate themselves, work smarter and better and help in taking this Nation back from going into an abyss. If there is a deliberate move to change our Republic to something else the citizens need to be informed and not be subjected to so many mandates to include choosing which light bulbs we use. The regular bulbs give off heat and that is not so bad compared to the mercury which is highly Toxic. This is the reason our nation was born as a republic form of government so that it would not give us Top Down dictatorial mandates taking away our right to clean food, water, ability to choose our own light bulbs etc. Also, they sprayed environment with Aluminum to help global “warming” but here another wacky choice since Aluminun kills plants and micro-organisms.
Enough is enough, the one to be sustainable should be the federal reserve itself which is what is causing the planet to have to work many times more to pay back electronic interest debt, plus to have to cut so many more trees and build more hospitals since the pushed pharmaceutical drugs are sending most of the people to hospitals which most states had to build so many new ones. Lets not forget the dollar bills which are not sustainable causing huge bubbles, personal suffering to the people and bailouts due to splurging the population money across the globe yet enslaving and taking away rights of the citizens. This is very disturbing to include the Bzerskinki words written in his book “between two ages” that seem to be turning into a reality and NOT normal for any American for we are not meant to be anyone’s wimp nor “commoners” especially to individuals declaring themselves Kings, nor become their Units of production laborers. This is reason they wish to take God from our culture for it is unGodly the many inimical senseless plans to be handed down to us.
Disturbing writtings coming to fruition in America:
• The Technetronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities. – Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era, 1970 info from book quote shared by Creative Message. Brzezinski author of Grand Chess Board.
February 10, 2011
Uncategorized A Constitutional Republic, A Republic vs. a democracy, Checks & balances between branches of government, Goldman Sacks, quantitative easing, Say NO to Gun Confiscation Steps, second amendment rights, tax payers money, Taxation without representation, UN's Small Arms Treaty Leave a comment
Please take the survey and if possible donate so our representatives trying to preserve our second amendment rights could do so and fight the lobby and special interests wishing to make us powerless for their global take-over power schemes that makes us vulnerable to those with the underground weapons.
If passed by the UN and ratified by the U.S. Senate, the UN “Small Arms Treaty” would almost certainly FORCE the U.S. to:
*** Enact tougher licensing requirements, making law-abiding Americans cut through even more bureaucratic red tape just to own a firearm legally;
*** CONFISCATE and DESTROY ALL “unauthorized” civilian firearms (all firearms owned by the government are excluded, of course);
*** BAN the trade, sale and private ownership of ALL semi-automatic weapons;
*** Create an INTERNATIONAL gun registry, setting the stage for full-scale gun CONFISCATION.
I’m sure I don’t have to tell you that this is NOT a fight we can afford to lose.
Ever since its founding 65 years ago, the United Nations has been hell-bent on bringing the United States to its knees.
To the petty dictators and one-world socialists who control the UN, the United States of America isn’t a “shining city on a hill” — it’s an affront to their grand designs for the globe.
These anti-gun globalists know that so long as Americans remain free to make our own decisions without being bossed around by big government bureaucrats, they’ll NEVER be able to seize the worldwide power they crave.
And the UN’s apologists also know the most effective way to finally strip you and me of ALL our freedoms would be to DESTROY our gun rights.
That’s why Rand Paul and others were so glad to hear that the National Association for Gun Rights is leading the fight to stop this assault on our Constitution!
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton recently announced the Obama Administration will be working hand-in-glove with the UN to pass a new “Small Arms Treaty.”
Disguised as an “International Arms Control Treaty” to fight against “terrorism,” “insurgency” and “international crime syndicates,” the UN’s Small Arms Treaty is in fact a massive, GLOBAL gun control scheme.
So Please jut say NO but heck NO to any potential gun grab, please take the survey and donate if possible so that representative Rand Paul and others could help fight the gun grabs coming at us in congress especially when they continue to give themselves more and more power not granted to them under our Constitution and not normal for a Nation which is a Constitutional Republic not just a democracy or a dictatorship were the insiders at the top rule the masses whichever way is convenient to them.
December 24, 2010
There is plenty of blame to go around for the insecure and unstable state of affairs concerning our nation and the election results for 2010. The truth is that we all need to be more active in contributing that which is our best and forging the present and future of our communities and country for the better with each citizen regardless of political party affiliation doing something positive to help. One should not sacrifice individual lives and dreams at a great future in order for the end to justify the means being used in the present. Not everyone believes in giving their taxed labor or fruit of their labor to neither end human lives elsewhere nor use for inimical scientific Orwellian experiments in which the few could rule the many. As we look into past history one would think that a better more productive and efficient society would be developing but instead one finds one even more enslaving and society degrading at many levels than in the past. I often wonder that if Moses descended from heaven today he would find us even more enslaved than our ancestors for in the past it was mostly corporal or physical bondage yet today we are being enslaved at all levels and aspects of humanity even via our own breath such air under so called Cap & Trade (carbon credits), food (S510) and water (so called water bills) that makes it even illegal for communities to even collect rain water in their yards and today the human mind via frequencies. What is it that makes humanity not learn from past mistakes? How is that the population so easily falls back in complacency even at the expense of their children’ future and well being? Why can’t we continue to strive forward to appreciate the world’s beauty and in all people yet have allowed death and destruction to be so prevalent? Gradually yet efficiently both political parties continue to vote regardless of the will of the people and behind their back by not publicly displaying to voters at local post office, radio and local papers what is truly being voted on and the real impact that many of these bills will have on their present form of government and the transformation into one ruled by Oligarchs’ or self-declared kings or Queens no different than the tyrannical ones from years past who told the populace to just eat cake when things went wrong from the splurges and squandering of money. Instead of blaming others we must all look into the mirror and blame ourselves for not speaking out in time fearing criticism or ridicule and waiting until perhaps it was too late. As Americans and people coming from other diverse cultures who have contributed to the fabric that makes America such a great nation; lets come forward this New Year 2011 and try our best ever no matter in what small way, in making our nation the best ever. Lets have the determination to be more productive, smarter, healthier and efficient and develop a better paradigm shift or reawakening for America. I wish everyone a Merry Christmas, pleasant holiday for all other religions and Happy New Year 2011. May our creator bless us all and help us in becoming a better people.